Will you take the COVID-19 vaccine?

Will you take the COVID-19 vaccine?

  • Yes, as soon as possible

    Votes: 220 57.7%
  • Yes, but I do not want to be among the first to take it.

    Votes: 68 17.8%
  • Maybe

    Votes: 17 4.5%
  • Not Sure

    Votes: 21 5.5%
  • Absolutely not

    Votes: 50 13.1%
  • I do not care if I do or don't

    Votes: 5 1.3%

  • Total voters
    381
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
21,230
15,846
113
I already told you.
Tell me again, I really don't pay that much attention to your bullshit nonsense and dumbass links so enlighten me one more time please.

Yes. The CDC itself admitted the deaths are horribly inflated, and the PCR test is total bullshit, which everybody already knows.
Only in your feeble mind. What most intelligent individuals know is the deaths are under counted on inflated.
 

drewstar

Well-known member
Dec 22, 2009
682
448
63
Bon Voyage, Happy Travels, Don't let the door slap you hard on the way out!!!
You do know viruses mutate whether borders are closed or not right? And that historically viruses become less deadly when they mutate so they can survive by not killing the host right? Buddy of mine flew back from Florida a week ago. If people want the vax they can get one anytime there. Life is pretty much normal.

I thought the sheep and msm said these were super spreader events?

Tiesto and Alesso were at Club Liv in Miami Beach these last two weeks.

Tom Brady was at UFC 261 along with 15k fans (masks optional, no judgment either way).

40k went to opening day at Texas Rangers game. Arent these people supposed to be dropping dead like Canadian msm says? Youve all been played.


31A96AF4-3E4D-488A-BD88-351F277FE717.jpeg 206B4CC3-2762-4E47-9C64-03BD2485F2C2.jpeg 9720E5D9-5734-4FDF-A2EF-61EF7564641F.jpeg 997637D5-C3A9-45ED-96F2-A51484FCDE70.jpeg 543DD49E-1697-4FA1-98B3-C36DAC139C81.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phil C. McNasty

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
21,230
15,846
113
You do know viruses mutate whether borders are closed or not right? And that historically viruses become less deadly when they mutate so they can survive by not killing the host right? Buddy of mine flew back from Florida a week ago. If people want the vax they can get one anytime there. Life is pretty much normal.

I thought the sheep and msm said these were super spreader events?

Tiesto and Alesso were at Club Liv in Miami Beach these last two weeks.

Tom Brady was at UFC 261 along with 15k fans (masks optional, no judgment either way).

40k went to opening day at Texas Rangers game. Arent these people supposed to be dropping dead like Canadian msm says? Youve all been played.


You need HELP!!!! Are you SPFREE's pinch hitter??
 

drewstar

Well-known member
Dec 22, 2009
682
448
63


You need HELP!!!! Are you SPFREE's pinch hitter??
Try using your brain for once the facts are in plain view you just keep denying it.

D49A417A-5CBE-4C4E-9787-6BE8ECDDBA8F.jpeg
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,063
2,615
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Supreme Court: Pfizer, Moderna et al. may own your genes once you’re injected with their lab-created mRNA, DNA


WASHINGTON, D.C. — This article is prefaced with a shout-out to the good Dr. Carrie Madej (maa-DAY).

She is one of thousands of doctors and scientists worldwide suddenly labeled “conspiracy theorists” and “disinformation” by mainstream and social media. They tell peer-reviewed truth about COVID-19 and experimental shots. Dr. Madej is still on Twitter and Facebook for now. She is also featured in a viral video warning people about experiment mRNA and viral vector shots.

Dr. Madej said in a recent interview with The New American:

“The Supreme Court ruled that if there is anything synthetic, not from nature, inside of our genome, then whoever owns the patent on those synthetic parts now owns part or all of you as a human. That means Bill and Melinda Gates et al., The Department of Defense, et al. can literally own a human being. If this synthetic code is taken up into your genome, by law, you could be owned overnight.”
All legitimate doctors and scientists welcome fact-checking and peer-review. Turns out Dr. Madej is onto something, and further affirms every reason not to volunteer for these experimental injections.

Man-made bacteria and genetically-modified mice are patentable
The case of Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980) is the first time the U.S. Supreme Court heard a patent case involving naturally-occurring processes and/or organisms. Dr. Ananda Mohan Chakrabarty invented a species of oil-eating bacteria while working at General Electric in 1971. His invention streamlined the process of cleaning up oil spills.

He filed a first-of-its-kind patent for the new genetically-modified bacteria species. The United Kingdom granted the patent already. But the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office denied the patent because it determined the invention was a living organism. The U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (now the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) reversed the decision. It ruled that just because micro-organism are alive doesn’t mean they cannot be patented.

The U.S. Supreme Court, in 5-4 decision, affirmed. It ruled, in part:

Living, man-made micro-organism is patentable subject matter as a “manufacture” or “composition of matter” within the meaning of the Patent Act of 1952. The fact that the organism sought to be patented is alive is no bar to patentability.
The case paved the way for biotechnology companies and universities. The OncoMouse, patented by Harvard in 1988, was the first mammal ever patented. Harvard scientists genetically-modified mice to be predisposed to cancer (thus the “onco” prefix) so other scientists could study the disease.



Scientists have since created an entire discipline on “transgenic non-human mammals.” Of course there are serious ethical concerns. But the practice continue.

Patentability of human genes (mRNA and DNA)
The case that provides the blueprint for pharmaceutical companies claiming ownership of your genes is Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., 569 U.S. 576 (2013). This case originated from a Utah-based company called Myriad Genetics.

The company isolated the location and sequence of naturally-occurring genes called BRCA1 and BRCA2. Mutations in these genes positively correlate with predispositions to breast and ovarian cancers. Myriad filed patents on these genes in 1994 and 1995, respectively. The patents gave Myriad exclusive rights to cancer genetic testing that isolated natural DNA strands and created synthetic complementary DNA (cDNA) that resembled the original isolated strands.

The USPTO granted both patents in 1998. At least 2,000 other human genes had been patented through 2010, according to the New York State Bar. But the Myriad patents hindered other scientists from doing research on naturally-occurring BRCA1 and BRCA2, and thus hindered breast and ovarian cancer testing by other companies.

Supreme Court permits patentable cDNA
Several Plaintiffs, including Yale, Columbia, individual patients, and patient advocacy groups filed a lawsuit against Myriad and the University of Utah in May of 2009. The Plaintiffs argued that BRCA1 and BRCA2 are not patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 because they are naturally-occurring. Myriad argued that it isolated the sequences of the DNA and that the Patent Office had issued patents for other companies doing the same thing.

A long legal battle ensued that included two writs of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Federal Circuit twice affirmed that both isolated DNA and cDNA are patentable. Ultimately the Supreme Court ruled that only cDNA (synthetic DNA) is patentable. Isolated, natural DNA is not patentable. Breast and ovarian cancer screening got much cheaper after the ruling since Myriad no longer owned patents on naturally-occurring genes and thus the testing.

When it was all said and done, the Supreme Court invalidated five of Myriad’s 520 patent claims. Myriad sued competitors for marketing ovarian and breast cancers tests based on the two natural genes after the Supreme Court decision. Ambry Genetics won a case against Myriad in 2014. The company said via press release:

Myriad did not create or alter any of the genetic information encoded in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. The location and order of the nucleotides existed in nature before Myriad found them. As the Supreme Court made clear, neither naturally occurring compositions of matter, nor synthetically created compositions that are structurally identical to the naturally occurring compositions, are patent eligible.
Pfizer, Moderna, et al. and your genes
Yes, this article contains a lot of scientific and legal mumbo-jumbo. But in a nutshell, biotechnology companies can own living things if said things are genetically-modified and not naturally-occurring. No mouse is born in nature like the OncoMouse. It is thus patentable. Oil-eating bacteria come from genetic manipulation, thus patentable.

Notice how all these so-called doctors and scientists avoid pointing fingers at Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson et al. when someone dies within hours, days or weeks of receiving their shots. It’s almost as if they are carefully navigating the trademark and patent landscape. Moderna owns several mRNA patents. But doctors and hospitals wanting a piece of the mRNA pie cannot bite the hand that feeds them.

The synthetic mRNA of Pfizer and Moderna, along with the viral vector DNA delivery systems of Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca, change your genetic code, making you “genetically-modified.” Granted mainstream media say the foregoing is “conspiracy theory.” But Moderna Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks tells you straight up that the shots change your genetic code. He calls the Moderna shot “hacking the software of life.” Viral vectors do the same thing.

So do these companies “own you” once you get the shots? Well, they own mice and bacteria created with their inventions. Once you get these shots, you are no longer a “naturally-occurring” human being. Prosthetic limbs, breast implants, etc. are not “natural” per se. But they are removable and not part of what fundamentally makes you human. Gene therapy is irreversible. Do the math yourself.

Stay vigilant and protect your friends and loved ones.

https://thecovidblog.com/2021/04/27...ure-injected-with-their-lab-created-mrna-dna/
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
21,230
15,846
113
Try using your brain for once the facts are in plain view you just keep denying it.
I want to correct myself. I first thought this was a SPFREE pinch hitter! I was wrong! This is you TJ you dirty little covid denier! LMAO
 

drewstar

Well-known member
Dec 22, 2009
682
448
63

As predicted by the “conspiracy theorists”, the govt is so invested financially that they will try to enforce the vax passport. Good luck with that medical tyranny. My body my choice.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,063
2,615
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Covid-19 vaccine from Pfizer confirmed to cause brain damage, neurodegenerative disease

A new report has found that the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) injection from Pfizer and BioNTech causes long-term neurological conditions like Alzheimer’s and Lou Gehrig’s disease.

Published in the journal Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, the paper reveals that the Pfizer jab has the potential to induce prion-based diseases, which according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are neurodegenerative diseases that damage the brain.

“The current RNA based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were approved in the U.S. using an emergency order without extensive long term safety testing,” the report reveals, referring to the messenger RNA (mRNA) technology in the jabs that has never before been administered to humans.

mRNA technology, it turns out, permanently alters human DNA, turning what used to be a human being into a chimera-like human hybrid being.

The genetically modified (GMO) proteins used in Pfizer’s Chinese Virus jab integrate themselves into the human genome where they remain permanently. There is no going back once you get jabbed, in other words.

This is confirmed by the National Library of Medicine, by the way, which determined that the impact of mRNA is irreversible. Thus, anyone who gets an experimental mRNA injection is a human guinea pig who is taking a massive health risk.

“The RNA sequence of the vaccine as well as the spike protein target interaction were analyzed for the potential to convert intracellular RNA binding proteins TAR DNA binding protein (TDP-43) and Fused in Sarcoma (FUS) into their pathologic prion conformations,” the report goes on to explain.

TDP-43, by the way, is the protein believed to cause dementia, ALS and Alzheimer’s. Similarly, the FUS protein is linked to ALS and Hereditary Essential Tremors, according to the Human Genome Database.

Did you get vaccinated for Covid-19? If so, expect to develop dementia
The purpose behind the experiment was to see whether or not these two harmful proteins embed themselves into human DNA, which is what mRNA technology does. It found that the Pfizer mRNA component “has specific sequences that may induce TDP-43 and FUS to fold into their pathologic prion confirmations.”

In other words, the jab has the potential to cause dangerous, disease-causing proteins to absorb into human DNA. This writer’s guess is that the same is true of the Moderna jab for the Chinese Virus, which uses the same mRNA technology.

“The enclosed finding as well as additional potential risks leads the author to believe that regulatory approval of the RNA based vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 was premature and that the vaccine may cause much more harm than benefit,” the report concludes.

“The vaccine could be a bioweapon and even more dangerous than the original infection.”

National File reportedly reached out to the CDC for answers as to why and how the mRNA jab from Pfizer and BioNTech was approved, despite this evidence showing that the technology is dangerous. The CDC did not issue a response.

“Why are people taking any vaccine when all diseases are survivable with enough vitamins C and D?” asked one commenter at National File, correctly pointing out that aggressive nutrition is always the most optimal way to keep oneself healthy and disease-free.

“I take my C, D, and zinc cocktail every day,” responded another, to which yet another added: “I also include magnesium, K2 and boron (trace amount).”

Others talked about what they take as well, including vitamin E, food-based multivitamins, and quercetin. This writer would also like to note that green tea contains a constituent called epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) that has been scientifically shown to protect against viral infections.

More of the latest news about the permanent health damage caused by Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) injections can be found at ChemicalViolence.com.

Sources for this article include:

NationalFile.com

SciVisionPub.com

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com

 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
21,230
15,846
113

As predicted by the “conspiracy theorists”, the govt is so invested financially that they will try to enforce the vax passport. Good luck with that medical tyranny. My body my choice.
Guess what TJ, you won't be going overseas anymore or ever again without a vaccine passport and please don't cry me a river of chartered rights bullshit because you have no rights crossing a border or boarding a plane!!!!!


Get your jab here!! We have a 2 for 1 special or bring an anti vax dumbass and get a free meal while they get their jab! One time only SPECIAL!!!!
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,063
2,615
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Israel said probing link between Pfizer shot and heart problem in men under 30

Details from an unpublished Israeli Health Ministry report into the side effects of the Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine have raised concerns that there could be a link between the second shot and several dozen cases of myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle, particularly in men under 30, Channel 12 reported Friday.

The concerns come from an intermediate report that was presented to ministry heads and to Pfizer in recent weeks, the TV report said. Excerpts from the leaked report stressed that investigators had not conclusively proved a link, but that they had significant concerns.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts