I meant no disrespect, was just a play on words!My mother's been dead for 40 years, so you might want to put a clothespin on your nose.
I meant no disrespect, was just a play on words!My mother's been dead for 40 years, so you might want to put a clothespin on your nose.
I've got TWO cheeks back there.I meant no disrespect, was just a play on words!
Lesson one of panhandling school. Get the guy to say yes to something, before asking for a handout.Used to work with a guy who'd tell a story and use "so I says". Annoyed the fck out of me.
Also, I always get a giggle out of "can I aksk you a question".
And as mentioned by others: "could of", "would of", "should of" are indicators of ignorance.
I did not know that.Chomping at the bit. The correct expression is champing at the bit.
Affect is usually a verb and effect is usually a noun.I agree with all of the beefs re: misuse of the words to, too, two, there, their, they're.
I am not as hung up on the words affect & effect. But when I know their proper use, I will get hung up when I see they are misused.
I have far too much free time on my hands.
I do not call it autocorrect. I call it automistake.My phone's spellcheck when texting often changes the correct word to the incorrect one. (you're to your, etc).
I catch it most times, but texts increasingly seem to want to control the word used.
I do not call it autocorrect. I call it automistake.
They should be replaced with grammar classes in middle, junior and high schools.spellcheck/autocorrect
I was looking for this, for some reason “on accident” makes me annoyed. Same with “I seen it” no you “saw” it or “you have seen it”So is it "by accident" or "on accident"?
Older generations use "by accident" but younger use "on accident". Apparently both are grammatically correct?