The election litigation thread

[Dutch Oven]

Your posts are simply an attempt to sound like a lawyer (and I have no idea whether or not you are) rather than to actually be a lawyer.

Interesting (and perhaps revealing) comment, considering what I said at the end of my last post to Perry!

Also, I don't think the problem is the effort required to re-read my posts at this point. I think the problem is that you misread them in the first place.

 

[Dutch Oven]

I have no doubt there are many who simply chooses to accept the reality that their fearless leader lost. That is part of the cult of personality to which you obviously belong. To accept only that truth which is passed down from your leader. I am sure there ate many people in NK who believe that Un shot a 28 with 7 holes in one.

Leap of logic. Better explanation is that there is room for reasonable disagreement on the wisdom of denying prompt hearings on election concerns held by half of the electorate.

 

[Perry Mason]

Well, you are speaking for Perry, since you're answering a post directed to him. LOL!

Next you are going to tell us we are one and the same person because we mostly agree with each other about you...

Perry

 

[Dutch Oven]

View attachment 28964

Next you are going to tell us we are one and the same person because we mostly agree with each other about you...

Perry

Wrong. Next I'm going to remind you that you refuse to take your own advice, and appear to have difficulty in reading and/or correctly comprehending my posts.

My turn. Next you're going to post a troll face directed to someone who you are trying to engage, rather than the other way round, and you're going to sign your name to your post despite it showing in the sidebar.

 

[Frankfooter]

Leap of logic. Better explanation is that there is room for reasonable disagreement on the wisdom of denying prompt hearings on election concerns held by half of the electorate.

Nice theory of fact or law that appears rational to you.
Better explanation is that prompt hearings were heard more than 60 times and in each case the arguments and lack of evidence lead to the judges rejecting the cases entirely.

 

[Perry Mason]

[you] appear to have difficulty in reading and/or correctly comprehending my posts.

Mostly because, from a lawyer's perspective, they are incomprehensible...

and you're going to sign your name to your post despite it showing in the sidebar.

Really bugs you, eh?

Perry

 

[y2kmark]

Rudy & Co. just keep going and going and going....

 

[Dutch Oven]

Nice theory of fact or law that appears rational to you.
Better explanation is that prompt hearings were heard more than 60 times and in each case the arguments and lack of evidence lead to the judges rejecting the cases entirely.

S

 

[Frankfooter]

S

You know what's really stupid?
Pushing claims that even Fox has had to retract.

Fox News is debunking election fraud claims made by its own anchors in response to a legal threat

After the election was called for Joe Biden, Fox hosts vibrantly defended President Donald Trump's unsubstantiated claims of widespread voter fraud.

ca.news.yahoo.com

Pushing claims that even the royal sycophant, Barr, won't back.

Barr says no reason for special counsels to investigate election, Hunter Biden, no basis for seize voting machines

Attorney General Bill Barr said Monday there is no basis for special counsel to investigate election, no federal authority to seize voting machines.

abcnews.go.com

Most stupid of all?
Trying to claim that its up to Biden to prove he won even after all the EC votes have been certified.

Rudy bizarrely demands evidence Trump DIDN'T win - after Joe got more votes

RUDY Giuliani has kicked off once again about the presidential election, this time demanding evidence Trump didn’t win – even though Biden got more votes. Judges have repeatedly thrown out of court…

www.thesun.co.uk

That is S

 

[Dutch Oven]

Mostly because, from a lawyer's perspective, they are incomprehensible...


Really bugs you, eh?

Perry

Hey, I was right! Turns out my powers of prediction are better than yours!

Your signature doesn't bother me. I just think it's revealing in a way that you've probably never understood. Being a lawyer is a profession, not a persona. Too many get into practice in search of an identity, rather than to serve their clients. The phenomenon reveals itself in many ways - such as first year law students who quickly start speaking in legal jargon that is beyond their comprehension, unnecessary to everyday speech, but which clearly identifies them as law students. Identifying yourself with a fictional lawyer is the adoption of a persona. And to reinforce it with a signature just buttresses the illustration.

 

[Dutch Oven]

You know what's really stupid?
Pushing claims that even Fox has had to retract.

Fox News is debunking election fraud claims made by its own anchors in response to a legal threat

After the election was called for Joe Biden, Fox hosts vibrantly defended President Donald Trump's unsubstantiated claims of widespread voter fraud.

ca.news.yahoo.com

Pushing claims that even the royal sycophant, Barr, won't back.

Barr says no reason for special counsels to investigate election, Hunter Biden, no basis for seize voting machines

Attorney General Bill Barr said Monday there is no basis for special counsel to investigate election, no federal authority to seize voting machines.

abcnews.go.com

Most stupid of all?
Trying to claim that its up to Biden to prove he won even after all the EC votes have been certified.

Rudy bizarrely demands evidence Trump DIDN'T win - after Joe got more votes

RUDY Giuliani has kicked off once again about the presidential election, this time demanding evidence Trump didn’t win – even though Biden got more votes. Judges have repeatedly thrown out of court…

www.thesun.co.uk

That is S

S

 

[Frankfooter]

S

Newsmax has also disowned your arguments.
Who are you left with, OANN and Rudy?

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1341094317843202048

 

[Dutch Oven]

Newsmax has also disowned your arguments.
Who are you left with, OANN and Rudy?

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1341094317843202048

S

 

[Frankfooter]

S

Another good day for you here, bud?
No successes in court yet, no new evidence, more retractions and even Moscow Mitch is saying cut it out.

Oh, there is one court case that might move forward, though.

House intends to reissue subpoena for Trump's financial records next year

Democrats say the documents are needed for potential ethics reform legislation.

www.politico.com

 

[Valcazar]

I thought Judges, like Judge Starr, were all-knowing and impartial?

Why would you think something so silly?

 

[Dutch Oven]

Another good day for you here, bud?
No successes in court yet, no new evidence, more retractions and even Moscow Mitch is saying cut it out.

Oh, there is one court case that might move forward, though.

House intends to reissue subpoena for Trump's financial records next year

Democrats say the documents are needed for potential ethics reform legislation.

www.politico.com

S

 

[mandrill]

Why would you think something so silly?

He had Judge Starr confused with his personal hero and role model, Judge Jeannine.

 

[kherg007]

Ken Starr fired from Baylor u in USA for not sufficiently dealing w sexual assaults

 

[Perry Mason]

Identifying yourself with a fictional lawyer is the adoption of a persona. And to reinforce it with a signature just buttresses the illustration.

So let me understand: To adopt the persona "Perry Mason" is bad... no good. To adopt the identity of a crock is good... excellent. Makes ample sense...

And of course no one here is adopting a persona... all these names that people use are honest-to-goodness, real people with real names.

OK. I can deal with many things you say... but now you are showing the kind of crock you really are!

I choose not to engage with someone ridiculous. I have had enough. Enjoy yourself. The stage is all yours.... troll!

Perry

 

[Dutch Oven]

So let me understand: To adopt the persona "Perry Mason" is bad... no good. To adopt the identity of a crock is good... excellent. Makes ample sense...

And of course no one here is adapting a persona... all these names that people use are honest-to-goodness, real people with real names.

OK. I can deal with many things you say... but now you are showing the kind of crock you really are!

I chose not to engage with someone ridiculous. I have had enough. Enjoy yourself. The stage is all yours.... troll!

Perry

Au revoir!