Rather than dancing, let me ask you one serious question. Today at the Arizona hearing, a person with the appropriate credentials, put forward as expert witness, presented an analysis of the security vulnerabilities of the Dominion voting equipment, software, and associated protocols used in that state. A similar analysis is set out in affadivits which support various emergency motions before the courts in Arizona and other states, most of which have not yet been determined. The thrust of this testimony is that the systems employed were vulnerable to tampering, that statistical analysis of ballot and vote reporting information supports a reasonable inference that tampering actually occured, and that other circumstantial evidence supports the same inference (evidence of internet connection and data transfer, contrary to state policy). I am not an expert in IT, and I assume you aren't either. Do you know of any reason why this evidence as to the unreliability of the vote tallies produced by these systems is not supportive of at least the emergency relief of an independent audit and cessation of the certification and elector appointment process, and/or why this evidence, if uncontradicted, would not support a legislative decision to de-certify the vote and/or halt the appointment of electors?