The election litigation thread
- Thread starter Dutch Oven
- Start date
This thread stands to be even more stupid then the James Fields defence threads!
And that's saying something.
Bud, so does that mean the senate and house elections were also not legit?
And if the polls were saying Biden by 7-9% and the votes 4-6% more than Trump, doesn't that mean that the fraud happened in Trump's favour and the number will get worse when you look at the party of disenfranchisement, impeached conmen, crooks and liars?
Why is it that Rudy and Steve Bannon's party aren't the ones that should be investigated?
And that's saying something.
Bud, so does that mean the senate and house elections were also not legit?
And if the polls were saying Biden by 7-9% and the votes 4-6% more than Trump, doesn't that mean that the fraud happened in Trump's favour and the number will get worse when you look at the party of disenfranchisement, impeached conmen, crooks and liars?
Why is it that Rudy and Steve Bannon's party aren't the ones that should be investigated?
For goodness sake, read the article. The only way you can be sure the same "glitch" didn't happen elsewhere is to manually check the votes in other counties that used the same software, just as they did in discovering the problem in Antrim.
I'm glad none of you are my IT guy!
If crooked Rudy says it, it has to be true. LMAO
I can't wait until Trumpfart is taken out kicking and screaming. Him and both his sons should be thrown in Jail for making the US look like a laughing stock around the world. The US will never be able to tell another country how a democratic election is to be held.
I can't wait until Trumpfart is taken out kicking and screaming. Him and both his sons should be thrown in Jail for making the US look like a laughing stock around the world. The US will never be able to tell another country how a democratic election is to be held.
The voting 'glitches' were human error and not the software...again, problem solved.
No, Software Glitches Are Not Affecting Vote Counts (Published 2020)
Some Republicans have blamed software glitches for vote-count issues in Michigan and Georgia. The Michigan cases were caused by human error and soon fixed, while Georgia software issues didn’t affect tallies.
Software design establishes the opportunity for human error. That's why you check to see if the same "human error" occured where there was the same opportunity.The voting 'glitches' were human error and not the software...again, problem solved.
No, Software Glitches Are Not Affecting Vote Counts (Published 2020)
Some Republicans have blamed software glitches for vote-count issues in Michigan and Georgia. The Michigan cases were caused by human error and soon fixed, while Georgia software issues didn’t affect tallies.www.nytimes.com
It's fixed in Antrim. The article I linked for you said it was still being checked in other counties by bipartisan reviewers. Didn't you believe that reporting? It was obviously a liberal writer, given the spin.
Here's the latest suit, in Michigan:
www.newsbreak.com
Trump Campaign Files Yet Another Lawsuit Seeking to Prevent Michigan From Certifying Election Results - News Break
Most of the campaign’s lawsuits, to date, have been unsuccessful. In yet another bid to deny Joe Biden the Oval Office, the Trump campaign has filed a new lawsuit seeking to prevent Michigan from certifying its election results. According to The Detroit Free Press, the campaign’s latest...
www.newsbreak.com
Google...There's the problem right there, you Republicans are still struggling with using a computer.
This is another lawsuit saying "Yes Judge, we were allowed into the counting place to observe and were treated equally to the Democratic observers but we suspect something went wrong because there were more Democratic votes in this heavily Democratic area" is it?
Where the requested remedy is "We feel all Democratic votes should be thrown out because no real American would vote for Democrats"?
That seems to sum up the legal strategy so far.
Where the requested remedy is "We feel all Democratic votes should be thrown out because no real American would vote for Democrats"?
That seems to sum up the legal strategy so far.
Au contraire, I'm not prepared to have my internet activity tracked by Facebook or Google. I will not log into ANY site that requires login via those services.
I don't have a Facebook account or a Google account either...I have downloaded Google Chrome as my default search engine because it's a million times better than the rest.
There is a stunning lack of curiousity in how this single election featured, as a partial list: 1) statistically improbable turnout numbers in key Democrat counties, 2) uniform Democrat "comebacks" in swing states based on submitting counts from Democrat strongholds long after Republican counties were finished counting, 4) large batches of votes which, improbably, were all cast for Biden, 5) vote updates overnight solely in favour of Biden when counting had, apparently, be stopped, 6) objectively proven unlawful resistance to party oversight of the tabulation process in Democrat strongholds, 7) use of machinery for signature comparisons (in states that even required it) that had inexplicably low rejection rates, 8) a media which is aware of all of these concerns, but calls election challenges "unsubstantiated" yet calls someone who has neither been certified by any state, nor by the electoral college, "President Elect" despite the absence of any concession by his opponent. Only a fool wouldn't insist on proof that all of these things have an innocent explanation.
