Again, would it be possible not to post messages that support moderators' decisions since people that oppose such decision cannot do the same. TERB is a private company, not a democracy, so, when you say you support your boss (or moderator), it is equivalent to saying that you support NOT DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED leader of you country. Such leader may be good or bad, but, by the sole definition of dictatorship, he is a dictator. We must follow his rules to live in his country (i.e. on TERB), but saying that you agree with such rules is not fair for people who disagree. So, if you believe in democracy but still want to follow the private TERB rules, the decent thing to do is neither support nor oppose the moderators' decisions and points of view but simply follow his rules. For example, people who disagree that indi's screening methods cannot be discussed, cannot say so because, according to TERB rules, members cannot question moderators' decisions. Thus, when you say that you support the rule that indi's screening methods cannot be discussion, you are engaging in unfair discussion where your opponents are simply not allowed to argue with you. Furthermore, for new members who are not familiar with TERB rules and/or cannot make fully logical conclusions, it may seems that majority of TERB members support this rule, while it is not necessary true
P.S.: As you can see, I did not say whether I support of reject any rules imposed by moderators, but I do believe in fairness, and, therefore, ask all members do not praise or critic TERB rules and moderators' posts in any way.
