Only fans top 10 percent
- Thread starter Bigdaug
- Start date
Increasingly girls post that they are top 10%, 2%, 1.5%. I'm not sure if this is genuine or whether it's just BS. In any event, customers can't check this stuff, which is presumably based on OF internal statistics - if it is based on anything genuine at all.
One of the major issues w OF is that there is so little reviewing from the customers' PoV (as opposed to the vendors') and so little disclosure of what is available on each vendor's page that one cannot make an informed choice. It's like pooning in the 1990's w no TERB and no photos of the girls.
Membership prices vary wildly. The girls are continually offering "discounts" and "deals" and girls can post shitloads of stuff or almost no stuff at all and the content can vary from lingerie selfies on a blurry IPhone to well executed fuck scenes with other participants. There is no standard of either price or quality.
If there was more of a customer community, guys might be a little more interested in OF.
One of the major issues w OF is that there is so little reviewing from the customers' PoV (as opposed to the vendors') and so little disclosure of what is available on each vendor's page that one cannot make an informed choice. It's like pooning in the 1990's w no TERB and no photos of the girls.
Membership prices vary wildly. The girls are continually offering "discounts" and "deals" and girls can post shitloads of stuff or almost no stuff at all and the content can vary from lingerie selfies on a blurry IPhone to well executed fuck scenes with other participants. There is no standard of either price or quality.
If there was more of a customer community, guys might be a little more interested in OF.
It's sad what isolation is doing to guys brains.
I'm a taster, most porn is excruciatingly boring to me. I'd rather patronize Kylie Flavell and Gamazda than any of these shit shmear sites...just my 2 cents
Btw, you fellas like Alice Cooper's guitar player?
I'm a taster, most porn is excruciatingly boring to me. I'd rather patronize Kylie Flavell and Gamazda than any of these shit shmear sites...just my 2 cents
Btw, you fellas like Alice Cooper's guitar player?
Cancel and get a refund, you mean?
I-Von, it's just boredom, horniness and the added titillation of knowing the lady who's getting fucked (hopefully) in the video.
I'm not wired that way.
I've had several Skype offers, I've declined them. What the point of a woman flashing her quim to me if she can't keep my ears warm?
Mingia...Bloody English, always ripping us Ities off.
I've had several Skype offers, I've declined them. What the point of a woman flashing her quim to me if she can't keep my ears warm?
Mingia...Bloody English, always ripping us Ities off.
I tried skype stuff. Its not for me, porn is free and better. Until they can replicate the touch, smell and feel of a woman its a lost cause.
Much English slang was Italian based. It comes from the slang genre of "cant", short for "cantare". Travelling circus and fairground performers from Italy in the 1700's had their own slang-uage and it passed on to be more widely used among the general public.
"Minge" is obsolete and a bit self consciously "artsy" these days.
It started earlier than that, with Edward III. Then Guglielmo Lanciagite translated Petrarch's poems into English. As his career progressed, he found his voice and became William Shakespeare.
This is my porn.
There's a couple hundred years between Edward III and Shakespeare, il mio fratello! Lanciagite must have had a very, very long lifespan.
I just do not get the Only Fans site Why guys would pay for that when there is plenty of free stuff online . Some women I guess are doing pretty good right now with everyone at home
oagre put your reading glasses on I said "then".
Since we are in one now, Edward III unleashed the first known Great Depression. He was contesting the Throne of France but his tax base had been drastically reduced by The Black Death. So he asked Milano's Bank of Visconti for a loan. He launched a second campaign and took the French King Jean prisoner at the Battle of Poitiers. By ransoming him, he was hoping to pay his debt. But his successor, the wily King Charles V was not going to play his game. Charles counter-attacked, going so far as raiding across the English Channel and burning Portsmouth to the ground. Edward III defaulted on his loan and the Viscontis went bankrupt.
Source: Barbera Tuchman, A Distant Mirror - The Calamitous 14th Century.
Since we are in one now, Edward III unleashed the first known Great Depression. He was contesting the Throne of France but his tax base had been drastically reduced by The Black Death. So he asked Milano's Bank of Visconti for a loan. He launched a second campaign and took the French King Jean prisoner at the Battle of Poitiers. By ransoming him, he was hoping to pay his debt. But his successor, the wily King Charles V was not going to play his game. Charles counter-attacked, going so far as raiding across the English Channel and burning Portsmouth to the ground. Edward III defaulted on his loan and the Viscontis went bankrupt.
Source: Barbera Tuchman, A Distant Mirror - The Calamitous 14th Century.
Hi Terb,
I can attest that when girls are posting OnlyFans %, it is because of an internal statistic from OnlyFans analytics page that gets refreshed as your earnings go up. I like the statistic.. it motivates me to keep playing and earn a higher ranking, like in a game! I just started on the platform a couple weeks ago and am in the top 2% now.
If anyone is interested on how much money I made on OnlyFans so far, I made a Youtube video about it showing screenshots and all my earnings information. This was moreso for ladies to learn how to get onto the platform and make some money during Covid, but I suppose gents may also learn how the platform works for us.
Yes, the % is a marketing tool and can stimulate some intrigue for potential subscribers, though I hardly think top earners have any correlation to the best OnlyFans accounts. Many SPs I follow, their OnlyFans are around $20/month. I definitely don't think my OnlyFans is for everyone as it is probably one of the more pricey subscriptions out there.. but my reason is because I'm not trying to be an all-star pornstar and rather it's just a way for people who miss me to see my face or for potential future clients who want to consider a date with me to get a preview for pay. There are so many accounts out there offering so much variety - everyone can find something they are looking for. There are even a bunch of free pages out there as well that promote their respective paid pages.. I assume there's a different strategy behind that.
Bottom line - most accounts don't make money on OnlyFans.
*UPDATE - I just heard back from OnlyFans and they clarified that the % actually means the % of people who made the same amount of you only in the past 30 days. So it is not a snapshot of lifetime earnings as I thought previously.. this makes much more sense now lol.
I can attest that when girls are posting OnlyFans %, it is because of an internal statistic from OnlyFans analytics page that gets refreshed as your earnings go up. I like the statistic.. it motivates me to keep playing and earn a higher ranking, like in a game! I just started on the platform a couple weeks ago and am in the top 2% now.
If anyone is interested on how much money I made on OnlyFans so far, I made a Youtube video about it showing screenshots and all my earnings information. This was moreso for ladies to learn how to get onto the platform and make some money during Covid, but I suppose gents may also learn how the platform works for us.
Yes, the % is a marketing tool and can stimulate some intrigue for potential subscribers, though I hardly think top earners have any correlation to the best OnlyFans accounts. Many SPs I follow, their OnlyFans are around $20/month. I definitely don't think my OnlyFans is for everyone as it is probably one of the more pricey subscriptions out there.. but my reason is because I'm not trying to be an all-star pornstar and rather it's just a way for people who miss me to see my face or for potential future clients who want to consider a date with me to get a preview for pay. There are so many accounts out there offering so much variety - everyone can find something they are looking for. There are even a bunch of free pages out there as well that promote their respective paid pages.. I assume there's a different strategy behind that.
Bottom line - most accounts don't make money on OnlyFans.
*UPDATE - I just heard back from OnlyFans and they clarified that the % actually means the % of people who made the same amount of you only in the past 30 days. So it is not a snapshot of lifetime earnings as I thought previously.. this makes much more sense now lol.
I don't have an OF. I decided to create my own site instead. I didn't want a third party platform and I heard men can not use Prepaid CCs for anonymous billing. I could be wrong about this, but you also can't use EMT or other more discrete payment methods. Which I felt was important to my clients.
I was curious about the % as well. So thanks FY for the clarification. Oh and as well, the amount of people actually making money vrs the many who are not. That is what I suspected.
I was pleasantly surprised by the amount I have made so far off my paid site. I can see the benefit of that internal % number to see how I am stacking up against others. I don't have any of that type of data which would be nice.
Having said all that, I assume it is a general algorithm for everyone and not just those in your pricing bracket. So a lady who charges $40 for a subscription would have few members but could be higher in the % due to her higher price. Not really a true indication of content for the customer but when advertised, could be miss construed as being a top provider of content. It would be a good click bait type advertising but could backfire is the content is not up to par.
I do wish I would start seeing real reviews of content creation by customers. Not just little recommendations in general request threads. I guess it depends on how long this goes on for. I had one client wanting to review but I said no because no one else is doing it. I was worried it would come off as a shill. And I didn't want my client attacked for paying for my Fan site just because others prefer free porn. Which I can see being the case here on TERB.
Sort of a catch 22. If you guys knew the content then they could go in with eyes open. The % advertised wouldn't matter really. But reviewing this type of service when there is plenty of free content, and TERB being what it is, guys limit themselves.
As for why guys subscribe, from what I gather is is mainly because this is a love physical person you have either been with or can be with in the future when all this is over.
I was curious about the % as well. So thanks FY for the clarification. Oh and as well, the amount of people actually making money vrs the many who are not. That is what I suspected.
I was pleasantly surprised by the amount I have made so far off my paid site. I can see the benefit of that internal % number to see how I am stacking up against others. I don't have any of that type of data which would be nice.
Having said all that, I assume it is a general algorithm for everyone and not just those in your pricing bracket. So a lady who charges $40 for a subscription would have few members but could be higher in the % due to her higher price. Not really a true indication of content for the customer but when advertised, could be miss construed as being a top provider of content. It would be a good click bait type advertising but could backfire is the content is not up to par.
I do wish I would start seeing real reviews of content creation by customers. Not just little recommendations in general request threads. I guess it depends on how long this goes on for. I had one client wanting to review but I said no because no one else is doing it. I was worried it would come off as a shill. And I didn't want my client attacked for paying for my Fan site just because others prefer free porn. Which I can see being the case here on TERB.
Sort of a catch 22. If you guys knew the content then they could go in with eyes open. The % advertised wouldn't matter really. But reviewing this type of service when there is plenty of free content, and TERB being what it is, guys limit themselves.
As for why guys subscribe, from what I gather is is mainly because this is a love physical person you have either been with or can be with in the future when all this is over.
Thank you for posting your videos. It's a new approach to virtual services and very interesting.
I know that some girls do make $$$ from OF - up in the $1,000's. But they build up a following over time and really work on their strategy and yes, they do follow the internet porn star route. It's not for everyone and the market is pretty glutted right now as practically every girl is considering an OF a/c or virtual gf services.
The idea that you buy a subscription to a girl's OF to preview her and assess if you want to actually buy her companionship when this is over sounds an interesting idea.
Curious about possibly following 1 or 2 girls just to get an idea of what they would be like to see in person.
What is the upcharge to see face photos? You classified this as "tips" and I realize that it would vary from girl to girl, so I just want a rough idea.
What is the cancellation protocol if - for instance - I were to follow a girl and then find her really not to my taste?.... Is there a proportionate refund? Or have I signed up for the entire month?
Thanks for all the information that you are putting out.
Do the SPs that go on Zoom, Teams, and other conferencing applications know that they can possible be recorded and posted on the net for everyone to see one day? Those that have their faces blurred, so that their families and friends dont recognize them, will see much more.
I've subscribed to about 15-20 Onlyfans SP content sites, and so far the only allure I can find, is if you have been with the girl before you can relive some great moments. Other then that, much better content for FREE or a lesser price all over the internet.
For $30.00 a month(Came out to $42.00 CSD with whatever exchange rate they use) on one site I got 9 pics and about 30 badly shoot scenes with fat(Yes, I know we all are , BUT i'm paying for this),mushroomed dicked dudes who most of the ladies could inhale up to their belly buttons doing some of the worst amateur porn I have ever seen. Terrible lighting, shaky cameras(Honestly IPHONES), and pretty short clips(I don't think only one was over 6 minutes).
I think I'm done with this new fad for now. Maybe the content quality will pick up with competition but for now it's a pass for me
For $30.00 a month(Came out to $42.00 CSD with whatever exchange rate they use) on one site I got 9 pics and about 30 badly shoot scenes with fat(Yes, I know we all are , BUT i'm paying for this),mushroomed dicked dudes who most of the ladies could inhale up to their belly buttons doing some of the worst amateur porn I have ever seen. Terrible lighting, shaky cameras(Honestly IPHONES), and pretty short clips(I don't think only one was over 6 minutes).
I think I'm done with this new fad for now. Maybe the content quality will pick up with competition but for now it's a pass for me
I'm like you, it doesn't do a thing for me. I need person to person but that is just me.
Last edited:
Quality is indeed an issue. I optimistically figured sp virtual porn would be like decent "amateur couple" porn on Pornhub - i.e. Leolulu or Notquiteamateur. But I realize now that having decent lighting and editing and a good quality camera make a huge difference, even if you are shooting from just one fixed lens.
