Climate change is fuelling a decline in rice crop production in major growing regions1988 – Global Warming To Sharply Reduce Rice Yields
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/11/climate-change-arsenic-damage-rice-paddy-yield/
Yup.
Climate change is fuelling a decline in rice crop production in major growing regions1988 – Global Warming To Sharply Reduce Rice Yields
You can't get faker fucking news than this. SMDH.Climate change is fuelling a decline in rice crop production in major growing regions
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/11/climate-change-arsenic-damage-rice-paddy-yield/
Yup.
Deny, deny, deny.You can't get faker fucking news than this. SMDH.
Climate change may cause a dramatic drop in rice production in major growing regions, a decline that could jeopardize critical food supplies, researchers report. New experiments exploring rice production in future climate conditions show rice yields could drop about 40% by 2100—with potentially devastating consequences in parts of the world that rely on the crop as a basic food source.
Now you think you're larue?Now answer the questions
In the 7 years since 2012 CO2 has increased , however US temperature have declined. This is inconsistent with your premise and I want you to explain how this could happen
In the 3 years since 2016 CO2 has increased , however US temperature have declined. This is inconsistent with your premise and I want you to explain how this could happen
Seven years is certainly long enough to want to know why?
After all you are demanding we have to change .......... well everything, because you say CO2 is the control knob on climate
I think we are entitled to enquire when your all-knowing prediction does not work.
I think seven years is a quite reasonable amount of time ask, " Hey, why is it getting colder , CO2 increased past the all important 0.04% level, yet it is colder by 2.6 degrees celsius in the USA over the last seven years?"
It seems a very reasonable question for anyone to ask
It is as simple as that
Answer the questions
Now you think you're larue?
Larue appears to have finally learned what cherry picking is, do you think you can?
The larue claim is false, the US isn't warming, he just cherry picked two dates to make the numbers appear like that.
I had no idea you weren't even as bright as larue that you wouldn't be able to pick that up.
New study on Antarctic ice loss.
I really like your writing styleNow answer the questions
In the 7 years since 2012 CO2 has increased , however US temperature have declined. This is inconsistent with your premise and I want you to explain how this could happen
In the 3 years since 2016 CO2 has increased , however US temperature have declined. This is inconsistent with your premise and I want you to explain how this could happen
Seven years is certainly long enough to want to know why?
After all you are demanding we have to change .......... well everything, because you say CO2 is the control knob on climate
I think we are entitled to enquire when your all-knowing prediction does not work.
I think seven years is a quite reasonable amount of time ask, " Hey, why is it getting colder , CO2 increased past the all important 0.04% level, yet it is colder by 2.6 degrees celsius in the USA over the last seven years?"
It seems a very reasonable question for anyone to ask
It is as simple as that
Answer the questions
Antarctica hitting record warm temperatures shows a continuing trend of warming, it is to be expected with the planet warming up. And yes, more useful is seeing a long term chart as is seeing long term glacier declines.Explain this
If you say "quoting the most recent average annual temperature for the USA (2019) as lower than 2012 & lower then 2016 while CO2 has risen" is cherry picking
Then how can your quoting a single data point (Antarctica record) temperature (a single point, esperanza station, 1840 miles from the pole) as proof positive of global warming, not also be cherry picking?
Once again you display your lack of any balanced or rational understanding of the subject & you display your need to spread propaganda without regard for logic
The result is not significant.I really like your writing style
Just to be fair the 2.6 degrees C should have been 2.6 degrees F. My fault, my mistake
The result however is still significant
Spain: Doctors confirm locally-acquired malaria case in Madrid Feb. 28The Guardian back in 1999
Spain will be ridden with malaria, the eastern Mediterranean will be as hot as the Sahara desert, flash floods will swamp parts of the American coastline and there will be almost no snow in the Alps.
This is the doomsday scenario painted in a new report on the effects of global warming on 10 of the planet's most popular tourist destinations in the next century.
The study, commissioned by the World Wild Fund for Nature, found that profitable tourist destinations could be turned into "holiday horror stories".
By 2020, visitors to the Costa del Sol could risk contracting malaria
It is one data point , 1840 miles from the pole from a data record only 58 years long. The 1930s were pretty warmAntarctica hitting record warm temperatures shows a continuing trend of warming,
Where as the 2019 USA temperature is an average of thousands of US weather stations over a whole year .
So it is the average of probably over 250,000 surface data measurements surface temperature data you have previously argued as beyond reproach
no the the only trend is here is the continued stream of your propaganda
Too bad for you the US cooling off over the past 7 years was not at all expected and in fact is completely at odds with rising CO2it is to be expected with the planet warming up.
And it has not been explained
So a single data point is cheery picking or is it not? Antarctica hitting record warm temperatures is a single data point 1840 miles from the south poleAnd yes, more useful is seeing a long term chart as is seeing long term glacier declines.
Your view appears to be that your single data points are Ok, but any evidence supporting an opposing view is cherry picking
The reality is you do not have a rational explanation for the US temp decline, so you claim cherry picking
The why do you ignore the long term trends of multiple ice ages , the roman warming period & the medieval warming period (ie natural climate variability) ?Long term trends are always more informative, as noted with the US temp increases that are very clearly happening and shown by the chart you posted.
Because it is inconvenient and does not fit the propaganda. Thats is why
But decreased over 7 yearsWhat is very clear is that there is zero chance that the US temperatures are declining, as you claim.
Over the 6 years, the US temp has increased.
What about 800 years or 1800 years. Those would be long term trendsOver the last 10 years, the US temp has increased.
Over the last 20 years, the US temp has increased.
Same with 30 or 40 years.
It has cooled off in the USA the past 7 years and that should not have happened if CO2 is the control knob for climateThe US is warming just like the rest of the planet.
As of the end of 2019
South America also looks like its cooled off since 2015
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/global/time-series/southAmerica/land/12/12/1980-2020
Asia does not look like it has warmed up since 2015, despite all the CO2 they are generating (Co2 get uniformly distributed pretty quick though)
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/global/time-series/asia/land/12/12/1980-2020
Asia is big chuck of the planet
North America is down from 2016
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/global/time-series/nhem/land/12/12/1980-2020
The Gulf of mexico looks a tad cooler since 2016
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/global/time-series/gulfOfMexico/land_ocean/12/12/1980-2020
Grettaland (Europe) does show a slight upward trend since 2014 (if you call 0.07 F a warming trend
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/global/time-series/europe/land/12/12/1980-2020
Oceania has also warmed a little in 2019 over the past six years. no doubt some warming caused by the Australian bush fires
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/global/time-series/oceania/land/12/12/1980-2020
odd how Gavin Schmidt claimed 2019 was the second warmest year on record, yet failed to mention North & South America & Asia show no warming or even cooling over the last few years
Any rational explanation that does not use the words "Cherry Picking"? This should not have happened if Co2 is the control knob on climate
Costa del Sol is 625 KM from MadridSpain: Doctors confirm locally-acquired malaria case in Madrid Feb. 28
https://www.garda.com/crisis24/news...ocally-acquired-malaria-case-in-madrid-feb-28
So I disagree with an alarmist opinion (that's right opinion) and I'm a denier. What are you some kind of Communist freak?Deny, deny, deny.
If that's all you got, I guess you gotta go with it.
Climate change is affecting crop yields and reducing global food supplies
http://theconversation.com/climate-...elds-and-reducing-global-food-supplies-118897
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/...killing-thousands-of-years-indigenous-wisdom/
https://www.google.ca/search?source...0....1..gws-wiz.....0..0i131j0i10.8vWzAME7zxsDeny, deny, deny.
If that's all you got, I guess you gotta go with it.
Climate change is affecting crop yields and reducing global food supplies
Fossil Fuels Are The Food Of Food
We all know that fossil fuels power our machines. Often overlooked however is the vital role they play in powering humans, as the food we eat is made possible by fossil fuels.
Shutting down fossil fuels without a reliable replacement will be a disaster and starve millions maybe billions of people to deathAnd according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, it is fossil fuels that feed the modern mechanized agricultural industry: the “dominant share of direct energy use on U.S. farms is fuels (including diesel and gasoline) to run machinery for field operations such as planting, tilling, and harvesting; to dry crops; for livestock use; and to transport goods.”
Supplying “water can also be an energy-intensive task,” the EIA adds. Fossil fuel-powered modern irrigation has limited our reliance on nature to rain water down on crops. Today, the electricity to power water pumps, filtration, and treatment systems, is inexpensive and abundant, thanks to coal- and natural gas-fired central power stations; while more rural settings can depend upon water pumps powered by diesel or propane generators. This ability to pump water vast distances created the opportunity for a wider variety of cropping alternatives, reduces frost damage, and has led to higher yields with increased drought protection.
Wrong again, mr science.It is one data point , 1840 miles from the pole from a data record only 58 years long. The 1930s were pretty warm
Where as the 2019 USA temperature is an average of thousands of US weather stations over a whole year .
The reality is you picked a single El Nino event, record warm year to measure from.The reality is you do not have a rational explanation for the US temp decline, so you claim cherry picking
Cherry picking, when one doesn't use your choice of warm US years you also get this from the same chart.But decreased over 7 years
Go grab the US charts for those temps then.What about 800 years or 1800 years. Those would be long term trends
It has not, you are lying based off of your cherry picking.It has cooled off in the USA the past 7 years and that should not have happened if CO2 is the control knob for climate
The planet is warming, rather than show how ignorant your claims are lets just go back to the global temperatures.As of the end of 2019
South America also looks like its cooled off since 2015
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/global/time-series/southAmerica/land/12/12/1980-2020
Asia does not look like it has warmed up since 2015, despite all the CO2 they are generating (Co2 get uniformly distributed pretty quick though)
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/global/time-series/asia/land/12/12/1980-2020
Asia is big chuck of the planet
North America is down from 2016
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/global/time-series/nhem/land/12/12/1980-2020
The Gulf of mexico looks a tad cooler since 2016
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/global/time-series/gulfOfMexico/land_ocean/12/12/1980-2020
Grettaland (Europe) does show a slight upward trend since 2014 (if you call 0.07 F a warming trend
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/global/time-series/europe/land/12/12/1980-2020
Oceania has also warmed a little in 2019 over the past six years. no doubt some warming caused by the Australian bush fires
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/global/time-series/oceania/land/12/12/1980-2020
odd how Gavin Schmidt claimed 2019 was the second warmest year on record, yet failed to mention North & South America & Asia show no warming or even cooling over the last few years
Any rational explanation that does not use the words "Cherry Picking"? This should not have happened if Co2 is the control knob on climate
CM posted that it was ridiculous to claim malaria would hit Spain.Costa del Sol is 625 KM from Madrid
From your own article
On Wednesday, February 28, doctors confirmed a locally-acquired case of malaria in Madrid. According to the University Hospital of Móstoles, the patient, a 3-month old infant who had not traveled to a malaria-affected area, is thought to have acquired the virus in the city.
You just post & post & post & hope some of the BS sticks don't ya