When you also agree to stop producing CO2.So when are you going to give your use and dependence on fossil fuels?
In 1989 Exxon's own internal scientists said that the a carbon tax was needed to slow the climate change they knew was coming.It was the first in a never-ending series. For example: https://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/17/science/earth/17cnd-climate.html
Meanwhile, the worldwide demand for fossil fuels continues to grow.
a carbon tax will not reduce emssionsWhen you also agree to stop producing CO2.
I back a high carbon tax and lowering our CO2 output.
So stop your lame ass straw man argument that total ending of fossil fuels is necessary.
It'll be a long transition, all the longer for fools who try to stop change.
Aw, poor Phil.Just put him on ignore, you guys.
Then he can ramble all to himself
Could just be the sixth great extinction, true that.https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/04/world/dead-birds-body-size-climate-change-scn/index.html
cultists are now claiming that climate change will cause birds to shrink 24 hours after claiming that climate change will put women at risk for giving birth early
You evaded the point.In 1989 Exxon's own internal scientists said that the a carbon tax was needed to slow the climate change they knew was coming.
Instead they spent millions on disinformation that you fell for.
Yes, the UN has been warning the world for 30 years.You evaded the point.
The UN has spent more than 30 years predicting total catastrophe unless the world reduced its output of man-made greenhouse gases -- while emissions actually increased.
Even the most numerically challenged can figure out that 30 years is longer than a decade. :biggrin1:
I've said this before and I'm happy to repeat it. Thirty years of doomsday predictions have had no effect -- in fact, the results have been the opposite of their desired outcomes.
Unleashing yet another round of apocalyptic forecasts fulfils the definition of insanity (doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result).
Another evasion. In fact, the UN has been saying for 30 years that we only had 10 years left (starting 30 years ago) to start significantly reducing emissions or the planet is doomed.Yes, the UN has been warning the world for 30 years.
If we started 30 years ago we wouldn't be dealing with 1ºC warming right now.Another evasion. In fact, the UN has been saying for 30 years that we only had 10 years left (starting 30 years ago) to start significantly reducing emissions or the planet is doomed.
If the UN's past predictions had been correct, it would now be "too late" (to quote the former chair of the IPCC) to do anything -- making all of these "action plans" on climate change completely pointless.
The only way you can justify governments doing anything at all is to concede the UN's previous doomsday predictions have been completely wrong.
when are you going to give fossil fuels?You get that chart from lunarplanner.com too?
realclimatescience is run by Steve Goddard aka Tony Heller.when are you going to give fossil fuels?
here is the original URL
https://realclimatescience.com/wp-c...r-Mean-Percent-Of-Days-Above-950F-vs-Year.png
somebody who reads antisemitic and holocaust denying websites shave no right to complain about sources
So what? He used government climate records unlike your sources that are linked to hamas, terrorists, holocaust deniers traitors like the rockeffeller family, and funded by an alt rightist rob unz.realclimatescience is run by Steve Goddard aka Tony Heller.
https://tonyhellerakastevengoddard.com/who-is-tony-heller/
Total bullshit site, no better than lunarplanner.com.
You really are a total sucker for bullshit.
Easiest mark on this site, even Big Sleazy looks street smart compared to you.