House Speaker Pelosi to announce formal impeachment inquiry of Trump

Charlemagne

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2017
15,451
2,484
113
The donors have spoken...


House Speaker Pelosi to announce formal impeachment inquiry of Trump

By Rachael Bade and

Mike DeBonis

September 24 at 1:01 PM

BREAKING: The announcement later Tuesday from Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) comes amid reports that President Trump may have pressured a foreign leader to investigate former vice president and potential 2020 campaign rival Joe Biden and his family.

A growing number of House Democrats are backing an impeachment inquiry as momentum shifts in the Democratic caucus.

Democratic officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to speak frankly, said she would back the step.

This is a developing story and will be updated.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and top Democrats are privately discussing the creation of a select committee to conduct the possible impeachment of President Trump, according to multiple lawmakers and congressional aides, underscoring the momentum among Democrats to try to oust the president.

The California Democrat has spoken to key allies in recent days about establishing a special panel rather than leaving the task with the House Judiciary Committee, said several Democratic officials. Nothing has been decided, the individuals cautioned, but some members are expected to publicly endorse the move soon.

The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity to freely describe private deliberations. Pelosi’s office declined to comment on the matter.

The conversations, while tentative, underscore the serious shift in Pelosi’s thinking about impeachment in recent days. Pelosi has been reluctant to endorse impeachment, resisting the extraordinary step for months despite pressure from the party’s liberal base and several 2020 Democratic presidential candidates. She has argued that neither the public nor the Republican Party, which controls the Senate, supports impeachment and that could prove politically costly to the moderate Democrats who helped deliver the House majority last year.

Recent reports, however, that Trump may have used his power to pressure a foreign leader to investigate a domestic political foe, former vice president Joe Biden and his family, have galvanized the push for impeachment. In the past few days, Pelosi has been sounding out Democrats about whether to proceed on impeachment. She also intends to make a statement on the matter on Tuesday, she told reporters.

Trump, meanwhile, has denied that he used foreign aid as leverage, though he did confirm Tuesday that he withheld assistance to Ukraine.

“There was no quid pro quo,” Trump told reporters at the U.N. in New York. “There was no pressure applied, nothing.”

The creation of a special committee is expected to come up at a series of Democratic meetings planned for Tuesday afternoon, when Pelosi will address her caucus on impeachment for the first time since the news about Trump’s conversations with Ukraine broke.

Over the past 48 hours, a tranche of Democrats who opposed impeachment have come out in favor of an inquiry, a total that now exceeds 150 out of 235, according to a Washington Post analysis.

Rep. John Lewis, an influential member in the caucus, was one of the latest Democrats to back impeachment. The Georgia Democrat, a staunch Trump critic and close Pelosi ally, had declined for months to weigh in on impeachment out of respect for the speaker.

“There comes a time when you have to be moved by the spirit of history to take action to protect and preserve the integrity of our nation. I believe, I truly believe, the time to begin impeachment proceedings against this president has come” Lewis said on the House floor. “To delay or to do otherwise would betray the foundation of our democracy.”

The notion of a select committee is already causing consternation in the Democratic caucus and has the potential to spark a turf war about who will take the lead in the process. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) tweeted that Democrats “don’t have the luxury of time w/ another committee,” backing the House Judiciary Committee’s claim to oversee the proceedings.

“Judiciary has been investigating & putting the pieces together for months,” Ocasio-Cortez wrote. “Impeachment belongs there. We must honor jurisdiction, historical precedent,& work done + allow Judiciary to move forward.”

The creation of a select committee would be a blow to the Judiciary panel, which has taken the lead on the Democratic investigations and has already discussed possible articles, even hiring outside counsel to lead a possible impeachment. But some senior Democrats have been unhappy with how the panel has handled its investigative work and hearings, blaming the committee for the House’s failure to move public sentiment in favor of impeachment in recent months.

Atop that, the dynamic between Pelosi, a longtime impeachment skeptic, and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler has been tense in recent weeks, as the New York Democrat pushed the speaker to embrace impeachment proceedings before she was ready. For months, Pelosi refused, even as she signed off on the committee’s work and legal arguments suggesting that an impeachment inquiry was already underway.

Privately, Pelosi took jabs at Nadler, telling lawmakers recently that only the full House could say that the chamber was impeaching the president. The comments were first reported by Politico.

The Judiciary Committee did not respond to request for comment. But the panel’s recent questioning of former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski, while seen as a political circus, yielded results at the end of the hearing, when a staff lawyer was able to get Lewandowski to confirm allegations of potential obstruction by the president, prompting Democrats outside the panel to suggest that the committee should have its lawyers lead, not members.

A select committee would give Pelosi more power over the process. Pelosi would be able to name the lawmakers on the committee, for example. Many say she’s already eyeing a way to give House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), one of her closest allies, a greater role in any investigation.

The idea could run into resistance not only from Judiciary Democrats who want to protect their turf but from other lawmakers. Rep. Gerald E. Connolly (D-Va.), for instance, also expressed concern that there was not enough time to create a select committee. The House, he said, needs to move now to impeach.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/pelosi-top-democrats-privately-discuss-creation-of-select-committee-for-impeachment/2019/09/24/af6f735a-dedf-11e9-b199-f638bf2c340f_story.html
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
The 30+ Dem Reps from Trump districts will be forced to go on the record. That’s the only impact this will have.
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
The 30+ Dem Reps from Trump districts will be forced to go on the record. That’s the only impact this will have.
As opposed to the GOP members of House and Senate who should feel guilty taking any salary while abdicating their constitutional responsibility. They really should be on the payroll of the Trump organization which is where they take their orders from.
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
26,839
4,949
113
This, just like the Mueller investigation, will go nowhere.

And even if they do decide to impeach (which I dont think they will) it will never get past the Senate.
The only chance they have is if Dems take back the House in 2020
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
As opposed to the GOP members of House and Senate who should feel guilty taking any salary while abdicating their constitutional responsibility. They really should be on the payroll of the Trump organization which is where they take their orders from.
I can see why the girl from Sweden is so compelling, there are so many middle aged men here acting like teenage girls.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
This, just like the Mueller investigation, will go nowhere.

And even if they do decide to impeach (which I dont think they will) it will never get past the Senate.
The only chance they have is if Dems take back the House in 2020

Dems have the House, it’s the Senate they need. This will make keeping the house harder. Pelosi has been reticent because she knows this and she doesn’t want to lose the gavel.
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
26,839
4,949
113
Dems have the House, it’s the Senate they need
Yeah my bad, I meant to type congress.

If they do impeach it'll just be a formality like it was with Clinton.
And it might backfire on them, because voters might feel they are not honoring a fairly elected POTUS
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
Yeah my bad, I meant to type congress.

If they do impeach it'll just be a formality like it was with Clinton.
And it might backfire on them, because voters might feel they are not honoring a fairly elected POTUS
Voters have been feeling like others are not honoring a fairly elected POTUS...since the day he was elected.
 

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
7,358
3,509
113
It’s about time. This recent whistleblower situation was the last straw...trump literally cannot stop being corrupt. It is hardwired into his neurocircuitry.
 
O

OnTheWayOut

Too late!

It took long enough for Pelosi, but at least its finally happening.

Hey Slurpee, its the end game!
Don't cream your jeans too much Frankie...... this won't get any more traction than the rest of the ill advised lefty attempts. :encouragement:
 

The Oracle

Pronouns: Who/Cares
Mar 8, 2004
25,825
51,810
113
On the slopes of Mount Parnassus, Greece
It’s about time. This recent whistleblower situation was the last straw...trump literally cannot stop being corrupt. It is hardwired into his neurocircuitry.
Their all the same on both sides KB.

Trump is just well Trump. No filter whatsoever
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,722
263
83
So are you saying that once someone is elected that they are above the law?
Once someone is elected fairly and democratically the voters should accept the outcome as part of democratic beliefs they hold so dear and within a free society than many have died to defend.

No one is above the law. But the law is not enforced within the court of public opinion. Innocent until proven guilty. Any deviation from those core beliefs for the purpose "whining because you didn't get your way" is hypocritical...and stupid.
 

glamphotographer

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2011
16,988
17,100
113
Canada
There are angry people calling for Trudeau to be impeached. In Canada the Prime Minister cannot be impeached.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Too late!

It took long enough for Pelosi, but at least its finally happening.

Hey Slurpee, its the end game!
I’m not sure you understand how this works.
 
Toronto Escorts