Creator Of Global-Warming's Infamous "Hockey Stick" Chart Loses 'Climate-Science' Law

[Big Sleazy]

Creator Of Global-Warming's Infamous "Hockey Stick" Chart Loses 'Climate-Science' Law

I wish we could have an adult conversation about what the real agenda is with "climate change". But when TPTB have the money to buy off academia and the media. I doubt we'll ever get around to addressing the real and critical issues we face today.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019...key-stick-chart-loses-climate-science-lawsuit

 

[Frankfooter]

Your link says that Mann didn't lose and that Ball just asked for adjournment due to delay.
Do you even read the shit you post?

 

[PornAddict]

Your link says that Mann didn't lose and that Ball just asked for adjournment due to delay.
Do you even read the shit you post?

The Canadian court issued it’s final ruling in favor of the Dismissal motion that was filed in May 2019 by Dr Tim Ball’s libel lawyers.

Not only did the court grant Ball’s application for dismissal of the nine-year, multi-million dollar lawsuit, it also took the additional step of awarding full legal costs to Ball. A detailed public statement from the world-renowned skeptical climatologist is expected in due course.

This extraordinary outcome is expected to trigger severe legal repercussions for Dr Mann in the U.S. and may prove fatal to climate science claims that modern temperatures are “unprecedented.”

...

Dr Mann lost his case because he refused to show in open court his R2 regression numbers (the ‘working out’) behind the world-famous ‘hockey stick’ graph

 

[2big2frail]

I really don't get why climate denialists ie) stupid brainless fucks, are so adamant about climate change being a non-issue. What is there really to lose?

 

[Frankfooter]

The Canadian court issued it’s final ruling in favor of the Dismissal motion that was filed in May 2019 by Dr Tim Ball’s libel lawyers.

Not only did the court grant Ball’s application for dismissal of the nine-year, multi-million dollar lawsuit, it also took the additional step of awarding full legal costs to Ball. ]

No money was awarded Ball.
You were suckered. Again.

Ball complained he's too old and gonna die soon and that his attacks were so stupid they had no effect, so they dismissed the case.
No money went to Ball.

 

[HungSowel]

It is odd to have a case dismissed and yet legal costs were awarded to one party or another.

 

[K Douglas]

It is odd to have a case dismissed and yet legal costs were awarded to one party or another.

Ball was the defendant, Mann was the plaintiff. Mann didn't prove his argument that Ball maligned his character and reputation. He refused to turn over his data behind the hockey stick graph. He's a pseudo scientist and even worse a fraud artist. Ball was awarded costs, sum undetermined. Looks like Mann's lawyers will be appealing. Wonder who's bankrolling Mann - Greenpeace? 350.org? or maybe one of Soros' activist organizations?

 

[Frankfooter]

Ball was the defendant, Mann was the plaintiff. Mann didn't prove his argument that Ball maligned his character and reputation. He refused to turn over his data behind the hockey stick graph. He's a pseudo scientist and even worse a fraud artist. Ball was awarded costs, sum undetermined. Looks like Mann's lawyers will be appealing. Wonder who's bankrolling Mann - Greenpeace? 350.org? or maybe one of Soros' activist organizations?

Ball's 'lawyer' was as much a fraud as Ball.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/affidavits-in-michael-man_b_1711581

And the court case, this sums it up:

Tim Ball Pleads For Mercy As An Irrelevant Sick Old Man, Gets It, Declares Victory

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/20...elevant-Sick-Old-Man-Gets-It-Declares-Victory

 

[K Douglas]

Ball's 'lawyer' was as much a fraud as Ball.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/affidavits-in-michael-man_b_1711581

And the court case, this sums it up:


https://www.dailykos.com/stories/20...elevant-Sick-Old-Man-Gets-It-Declares-Victory

Take your left wing lying rags and shove em. I only deal with real factual news.

 

[Frankfooter]

Take your left wing lying rags and shove em. I only deal with real factual news.

Like wattsupwiththat?

Why don't you listen to one of the judge's ruling on Ball's work instead of the media?

“the Article is poorly written and does not advance credible arguments in favour of Dr. Ball’s theory about the corruption of climate science. Simply put, a reasonably thoughtful and informed person who reads the Article is unlikely to place any stock in Dr. Ball’s views, including his views of Dr. Weaver as a supporter of conventional climate science.”

https://www.desmogblog.com/sites/be.../Judge Skolrood, re Weaver v. Ball, 02-13.pdf

 

[K Douglas]

Like wattsupwiththat?

Why don't you listen to one of the judge's ruling on Ball's work instead of the media?

https://www.desmogblog.com/sites/be.../Judge Skolrood, re Weaver v. Ball, 02-13.pdf

This has nothing to do with Ball's work (which is fine btw since he has 40+ years of studying climate). This has everything to do with Mann's fraud. Stop deflecting.

 

[Frankfooter]

This has nothing to do with Ball's work (which is fine btw since he has 40+ years of studying climate). This has everything to do with Mann's fraud. Stop deflecting.

Ball was a geography prof, not a climatologist.
He lied to you.

You're basing your claims off a loser about who the judge said 'a reasonably thoughtful and informed person who reads the Article is unlikely to place any stock in Dr. Ball’s views'.
Since its clear you don't understand shit about the science and have to base your arguments off of twitter posts from that retired loser, Ball's reputation is all you've got.