Total denial.
In other words, you will never accept any evidence because you've made up your mind.
Can anyone see that Climate Change is all about money?
- Thread starter Fathammer
- Start date
In other words, you will never accept any evidence because you've made up your mind.
Read up. You may even use Wikipedia, if you don't have anything else, and come back. Someday.
Butler100%Exposed
Good to see your still hating on Obama and good to see your still posting your biased and hateful views regarding Obama and still as usual trying to minimize what he has accomplished.
As usual you have your blinders on, but being the first African/American president in the U.S.A is a big deal by not only the African/Americans in the United States but also globally as well as minorites around the world, as it gives these marginalized people in the United States as well as minorities around the globe hope and dreams.
But hey based on your biased and hateful views of Obam tell us again how the Nobel committee made a biased mistake in giving Obama the Nobe Peace Prize.
I believe that's poison in his hand- the C02 in his beer. Luckily he survived to serve as our savior.
"Distribution" is not "generation", and no tax has ever 'generated' wealth, only revenue — like a price. If you actually have a point you're trying to get across you need to try a lot harder
Apparently the big money to be made is in climate research, if you falsify your findings the righties say the UN will make you so rich that Exxon will be like a mom and pop operation.
Europe broke more temp records in June.
https://climate.copernicus.eu/record-breaking-temperatures-june#
Decades back when scientists first saw and reported the close co-relation between rising global temperatures and overall CO₂ in the atmosphere, the big oil companies were enthusiastic participants in the research and conferences. Their C-suite guys saw the money to be made as fossil fuel prices would be forced up supply scarcity and regulation. And they'd be well placed to transition to cleaner sources.
But those higher prices also made costly enterprises like mining dirty tar-sands bitumen profitable, and they made drilling for a mile sideways and pulverizing whole rock formations to get get some natural gas into a saleable proposition. Suddenly there was a glut of fossil-fuel they needed to sell, and profit from — as long as they kept prices high. And kept their dirty-energy bandwagon hitched to the right political horses. They still send observers to those meetings though; when you harvest what you didn't grow, you know your good days are limited.
We could hope that 'our' governments would coerce them into sourcing those supplies cleanly without making what's already bad even worse, but the poisoned rivers, swamp-festering open pits and eroded clearcuts we've inherited from centuries past should be enough evidence to convince us they won't. .Not when Big Coal, Oil, Gas, Lumber, Steel, … gets closer to the pols than people ever do.
No way in hell there can possibly be global warming with all the fossil fuels burnt everyday, greenhouse gases emitted etc. right?
Dont forget Brazil cutting down the rain forest which absorbs large quantities of CO2!
But hey, its a North America issue and Canada is warming up faster than any other nation. LMAO!
Yup, Brazil's contribution is in deforestation while the US and Canada primarily in burning lots of fossil fuels.
Everyone's doing their part to fuck over the climate.
That's why you need every country to agree to fix it.
I know we're doing it, but claiming that it'll do much about climate change is pretty ridiculous.
For that you need carbon taxes.
Well, we are all mortal, you know.
By the way, if temps rise as predicted, these countries are in danger.
https://weather.com/science/environment/news/20-countries-most-risk-sea-level-rise-20140924
And the melting over the last few years has increased dramatically.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jul/01/precipitous-fall-in-antarctic-sea-ice-revealed
