Honestly, I don't really care. Carry on.Johnny,
Just curious how you know how Stefano's session went? I may be mistaken, but I didn't see where he gave details of the session.
Honestly, I don't really care. Carry on.Johnny,
Just curious how you know how Stefano's session went? I may be mistaken, but I didn't see where he gave details of the session.
Sounded to me like you did when you made your unfounded comments. Make a derogatory statement you should probably care about backing it up.Honestly, I don't really care. Carry on.
For the purposes of the list, the “low bar” definition of GFE will be honoured as outlined below:The session wasn't a GFE, IMHO, therefore -1
What was the derogatory statement that Johnny made?Sounded to me like you did when you made your unfounded comments. Make a derogatory statement you should probably care about backing it up.
Asuran pointed it out - the rules are very specific about what should constitute a negative rating. Being "too restrictive for my tastes" to me doesn't fit the low bar. So it's not unfounded at all if we're still going by the original rule of the thread. But if we aren't, so be it, I don't really care.Sounded to me like you did when you made your unfounded comments. Make a derogatory statement you should probably care about backing it up.
Fine, great, I already tried to end this little sidebar.How do you know that "being too restrictive" doesn't mean that she's not fulfilling the criteria of this thread? He didn't have to give a reason for why he rated her a -1, but he did just to be nice, it's not up to you to decide whether his reason is valid or not.