Isn't that the same justification you're using for attacking Muslim countries?
How are you any different from Al Qaeada?
Syrian Refugee Murders 13-Year-Old Canadian Girl
- Thread starter Zaibetter
- Start date
How are you any different from Al Qaeada?
Which country did the US take over so they deserved the 9/11 terror attacks in your opinion??
The only country I thought was justified to be attacked was Afghanistan after 9/11.
3,000 dead US civilians was an act of war.
The 2003 Iraq invasion was a very dumb move by Bush. Should never have happened, but whats done is done
Not the way millions of Iraqis see it, Phil. But then, your friends and family weren't killed in the occupation.
Ready. Aim Fire,
Trudeau did a damn fine job with NAFTA, huh? Weren't you the buddy-boy saying he couldn't get the deal?
Ready. Aim. Fire. Another win for Buddy-boy Larue.
Why is he impotent to start one? You mean he can't find the "new thread" button?
Whenever there's an Islamic terror attack you're the first person to say we're not allowed to criticize that fucked up religion, and anyone who does so is Islamophobic in your opinion. I'm too lazy to search all your posts for proof, but many Terbites will back me up on that one
Do you even know what you're writing anymore??
You cant even answer LaRue's simple questions
The 9/11 terror attacks and most of the European terror attacks were not carried out by Iraqi's.
9/11 was carried out by Bin Laden (a Saudi), and by Mohammed Atta and his gang.
Atta was Egyptian and most of his crew were Saudi Arabian as well.
Neither Saudi Arabia nor Egypt are occupied by the US or are waged war against.
Whats even more ironic is Bin Laden comes from a very wealthy Saudi family, he is (or was) in no way being oppressed by the US.
Try again, oagre
LOL...so now you wanna quit the dialogue. Thats your favourite schtick when you're being out debated, you simply throw in the towel
First of all Bin Laden is Saudi, not Palestinian.
Second of all the US isnt occupying Palestine.
Last but not least, almost all of the other 9/11 hijackers were Saudi's or Egyptian. None were Palestinians.
So I ask you again, where's the justification in killing 3,000 innocent American civilians in the 9/11 attacks??
Easy for you to say. The folks who were invaded, the survivors of those killed and wounded, and those born since, into that country which has known no peace under American occupation, don't see that anything is done and finished. Thanks to shock and awe, their suffering has continued for decades.
Since most of the 9/11 conspirators were Saudis, it might just be they saw the USA's hand-in-glove puppetry of that autocratic monarchy as a take-over. Perhaps Afghanistan "was justified to be attacked" because Bin Laden hid out in its wilderness, and the Government wouldn't hunt him down and extradite him as the US demanded, but I doubt even Americans now think that invasion was productive.
If you let yourself be provoked into going to war, you'd better have a clear idea of what winning the war looks like. None so far.
Why are you asking me?
I showed you what Bin Laden and AQ publicly stated were their motives for the attack and now you're trying to tell us that they are wrong and only you really know what their motives were?
I'm saying Bin Laden and his gang were not Palestinians, so they had no business attacking America.
But lets use your fucked up Liberal logic for a second. Because Palestine is IYO occupied by Israel, I can then drive a truck bomb into the US consulate on University Ave. as a show of solidarity with the Palestinians, and thats perfectly justified in your opinion??
More news from the religion of peace: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...e-Muslim-men-targeting-progressive-girls.html
Are you trying to see how far you can get this thread off-topic? What fun!!
Try this one: https://parliamentofreligions.org/parliament/2018-toronto/pre-parliament-events
First you claim all Muslims work together against US actions in the middle east and now you tell us that they have no business doing so?
Which story are you going with?
And why are you calling this 'my logic', I'm just telling you what AQ and Bin Laden publicly stated were their motives.
What you really need to do is ask yourself why they came up with those 4 motives and what happened in the middle east for those to come about.
Where did I state all muslims work together against US actions in the middle-east??
Please post my exact quote
But it sounds like you sympathize with them. Or do you not??
Post #292, #239 for starters.
In those posts you suggest that all Muslims are violent and anti-western, or anti US.
I support peace, not attacks by anyone, US, Muslim or anyone else.
You clearly sympathize with the US attacks that have left 1-2 million dead Muslims, don't you?
Nowhere in those 2 posts did I state that ALL muslims are against the US (or the West in general).
Try again Frankie
I already said, I supported the Afghan invasion, but not the Iraq war by Bush in 2003.
You really dont read very well, Frankie
You can't seem to argue anything and have sunk from franky-like accusations to Canada-man style repetition.
You claim that the killer wasn't vetted. What evidence do you have? And despite what you claim, there is no possible vetting that can absolutely guarantee that a person won't commit a future crime, only reduce the risk.
So either grow a pair and learn to deal with criticism or stop posting your garbage.
