I see, it would still leave a paper trail though. Would it still remain possible for any person in blue to visit this financial institution and discover who the actual account holder is? I would think so.
I understand, hope anyways, most of us use a false identity in this industry all around but this may null and void these efforts if the above remains possible when doing etransfers under a false name.
For me, it really comes down to either parties wanting to push to have the other end of the business go through more obstacles for a visit and I do mean both sides. I understand we all would like for things to be 'safer' or 'hassle free' but if we keep adding to the process when will it end! Over the years clients have asked from Providers to have a website, Twitter account, email, proof methods like pics and videos, etc. Providers have asked for real numbers, etransfers, ID, references and board handles or a combination of some. What's next? IMO, the evolution has already ventured too far for both parties involved. My two cents.
I'll add:
This is an illegal entertainment industry, not one of corporate legal takeovers.