We could start by killing the catholic school board.Very sad! I think it's time to change the rules in the catholic world, and let those horny priests to be married and fuck their wife every night if they want..
We could start by killing the catholic school board.Very sad! I think it's time to change the rules in the catholic world, and let those horny priests to be married and fuck their wife every night if they want..
You're a fool! Nobody becomes a pedo, no amount of isolation would ever give me attraction to a child. They have access to women, the church is full of vulnerable single moms. Fortunately for you you have the white knights on your side.And my post amuse you Beavis?
Do you really believe those men become priests, because they want to hide their aberration??? ...lol.
Becoming a Catholic priest is a serious decision and they want to serve the Lord first. Some of them can't keep their celibacy, and BECOME a pedophile , but they didn't want to be a priest , just because they want fuck young boys in the future. Where are you come from? From the Mars?
Do you really think , pedophiles are not attracted to other adults? Big parts of the pedophiles are married men, and they have own family.
They are not BORN as a pedophile. They become pedophiles in their adult life. There is a big difference.
Yeah keep posting! You have really good fantasy and you are funny! Hollywood is waiting for you.
Your argument is a classic "psychologist's fallacy".You're a fool! Nobody becomes a pedo, no amount of isolation would ever give me attraction to a child.
Not that I am calling you out on bullshit, but where are such "well documented" claims that you are referring to, published? Even in swedish. I can use google translate.They have access to women, the church is full of vulnerable single moms. Fortunately for you you have the white knights on your side.
It's well documented that priests become priests to hide or try to suppress their sexual orientation, maybe read in swedish if you can't understand English.
So after the rant we get to this.. . . .Having said that, it is ultimately a personal decision to abuse anyone, especially a little kid. As Dennis Miller once ranted..."If you ever experience the slightest thought of diddling a little kid, just take one for the team and put a bullet in your head before it ever has a chance to become more. than a thought."
So after the rant we get to this.
Isn't it acting out rather than feeling or passing thought? So you are telling us that if you ever lost your temper and wished someone were dead, or had dark sexual desires you should be taken out and executed even though you never acted out on those thoughts?
Further that it is utterly impossible for anyone to resist temptation.
Those who sexual abuse children should be prosecuted! Those who resisted temptation should be allowed to go on their way.
^ Really you have never known anyone in your life who has resisted temptation? ~~~ Honestly no one at all that when a woman said no, backed off -- every single guy you know who was in that situation raped.You'll have to speak to Dennis Miller. They were his words, not mine. And neither of us said anything about being taken out and executed. For a lawyer, and someone with such knowledge of history etc,, you make pretty bad arguments that have multiple logical fallacies when you get emotional.
But I'm glad -ahem- whomever you might be referring to has resisted the temptation to act out their feelings of wanting to engage in sex with children, has resisted. Your sympathy is noted.
My sympathy lies with the children who have been the victims of those who couldn't resist, and didn't "take one for the team" before they lost that control.
Two logical fallacies in your already weak argument.^ Really you have never known anyone in your life who has resisted temptation? ~~~ Honestly no one at all that when a woman said no, backed off -- every single guy you know who was in that situation raped.
Anyone want to point out which logical fallacy Aardie is using here?^^^ Really Charlemagne, you don't believe that there are a huge number of very upset Roman Catholics over this issue and that other denominations are not also deeply hurt by sexual exploitation.
Perhaps you know of a Religion or denomination in the West which doesn't have significant sexual abuse prevention programs, however, I don't.
You're a known white knight so paying any attention to you is a waste of time. Everybody knows the priesthood is a haven for gay men and pedos, except you apparently and Iris, but she is very stupid so I will excuse her.Your argument is a classic "psychologist's fallacy".
You presuppose the objectivity of your own perspective when analyzing the behaviour of another.
By your own argument, no one would ever become, say, a Priest or garbage man because you wouldn't become either of them.
Not that I am calling you out on bullshit, but where are such "well documented" claims that you are referring to, published? Even in swedish. I can use google translate.
Not sure what the purpose of your argument is. Or why you are being so hostile. Are you just picking on Iris because she has touched a nerve in you or what?
Iris never gets it. The idea that giving these men the opportunity to marry women in order to access their love boxes will somehow quench their thirst for young boy fun is laughable.You just don't get it do you, one hour face palm. Do you think peodaphiles are attracted to women? Why do you think these guys become priests, to pray on children and hide their homosexuality, that part I don't care about, priests can have sex with one another all they want.