InfoWars' main YouTube channel is two strikes away from being banned...Hahahahahahaha

[LT56]

You're a lot like the media outlets you support. You don't know the difference between an opinion and a fact, and you don't care. You certainly don't care about getting your own facts straight.

I want to pick up on one of your statements, just to see if any fun can be had. You say the MSM doesn't report on crazy bullshit. What did you call all of the MSM reports on whether Trump was/is suffering from mental illness, based on the medical opinions of doctors (and many other guests who are not doctors, but were happy to offer their opinions on air) who never medically examined him? Your answer should be enlightening.

p.s. I guess you're saying the Bloomberg article is fake news. Maybe they'll be banned next.
p.p.s. YouTube is a private company that's entitled to develop/edit content that completely conforms its its desired political positioning if it so desires. And the public is entitled to point that out as they do so. The problem is that YouTube, thus far, refuses to admit that it operates from a particular political philosophy, and as a result, its viewers don't understand the product they are consuming.

You claimed/inferred that the Alex Jones YOUTUBE video was improperly removed due to over-zealous enforcement of YOUTUBE’s harassment policy and that YOUTUBE had admitted to this. That was untrue. Please stop trying to change the topic. Please admit that you were lying.

PS: The Bloomberg article does NOT state that the InfoWars vid was improperly removed. You are trying to misrepresent what it said. Please admit that you are full of shit and that no one should ever take anything you say seriously ever again (not that anyone ever did).

 

[Bud Plug]

You claimed/inferred that the Alex Jones YOUTUBE video was improperly removed due to over-zealous enforcement of YOUTUBE’s harassment policy and that YOUTUBE had admitted to this. That was untrue. Please stop trying to change the topic. Please admit that you were lying.

PS: The Bloomberg article does NOT state that the InfoWars vid was improperly removed. You are trying to misrepresent what it said. Please admit that you are full of shit and that no one should ever take anything you say seriously ever again (not that anyone ever did).

If you were a horse, you'd be walking around with a pair of blinders on. Your posts are unresponsive and silly.

 

[LT56]

If you were a horse, you'd be walking around with a pair of blinders on. Your posts are unresponsive and silly.

My posts call out your lies and don’t allow you to change the topic or engage in whataboutism.

Must be very frustrating for you.

Admit that you are a lying purveyor of Fake News or stop posting in this thread. My patience wears thin.

 

[Bud Plug]

My patience wears thin.

Oooohh! Your patience wears thin! LOL! Maybe it's not your patience. Maybe its your ability to reason.

 

[LT56]

Oooohh! Your patience wears thin! LOL! Maybe it's not your patience. Maybe its your ability to reason.

Your days of spreading fuckery and insane bullshit around here are about to come to a crashing fucking stop, Sir! Take back your lies or face the consequences!

 

[Bud Plug]

Your days of spreading fuckery and insane bullshit around here are about to come to a crashing fucking stop, Sir! Take back your lies or face the consequences!

I'm dying to know what you think the consequences of my posts are! Please continue.

 

[Promo]

My posts call out your lies and don’t allow you to change the topic or engage in whataboutism.

Must be very frustrating for you.

Admit that you are a lying purveyor of Fake News or stop posting in this thread. My patience wears thin.

Couldn't agree more LT. You are witnessing Bud Plug's standard MO.

He comments on issues that he's not bothered to fully research. More accurately he express (uninformed) opinions because with BP facts are never in play. Then a Terbite will correct him with facts and provide proof of those facts. BP will then redirect and reflect and try to seize on some minor side point. He'll try outright lies, but his lies are pretty transparent. Next comes his insults (#20, #22).

Over the next few days, more information on the OP will become available and completely disprove BP. He'll totally ignore the thread. Same routine 3 ... 4 ..... 5 times a day. Same as C-M, PornAddict and a few others here on Terb. Remember, Terb is all those folks have.

 

[Bud Plug]

Couldn't agree more LT. You are witnessing Bud Plug's standard MO.

He comments on issues that he's not bothered to fully research. More accurately he express (uninformed) opinions because with BP facts are never in play. Then a Terbite will correct him with facts and provide proof of those facts. BP will then redirect and reflect and try to seize on some minor side point. He'll try outright lies, but his lies are pretty transparent. Next comes his insults (#20, #22).

Over the next few days, more information on the OP will become available and completely disprove BP. He'll totally ignore the thread. Same routine 3 ... 4 ..... 5 times a day. Same as C-M, PornAddict and a few others here on Terb. Remember, Terb is all those folks have.

Hilariously wrong in every respect! LOL!

However, let's just focus on one thing you said. Please provide me with the "research" I've failed to consider that PROVES that an InfoWars video was concocted as a hoax to harass victims of the Parkland shooting, as opposed to being a report based on information from their sources and well as their analysis of the use of of crisis actors in other instances by political organizations. Of course, the fact that they claimed sources doesn't mean their sources were correct (any more than CNN's sources were correct regarding what Comey's statement to Congress was going to be, or MSNBC's sources were correct about when Trump officials were aware of WikiLeaks documents). It also doesn't mean InfoWars opinions about when crisis actors are used or not used is correct either. But it does mean the story wasn't a "hoax" and it does mean that it wasn't harassment of shooting victims (if it's even rational to tie their criticism to that, as opposed to involvement of Hogg in gun control advocacy). Now you show me the "research" which proves it WAS a hoax, as opposed to a story in support of an opinion that turned out not to be substantiated.

Tell you what, why don't you make it a group project? You and LT56 can work on it together.

I won't hold my breath for your report.

p.s. You are aware, aren't you, that YouTube already removed one of the two strikes against InfoWars, following their appeals (and YouTube's acknowledgement regarding misapplication of its policy to right wing sites)?

 

[FAST]

It must make you feel important that he takes such a personal interest in you though.

He even posted that he was watching another member for 3 weeks, and then followed with his usual baseless rants.

Something not quite right here

 

[Bud Plug]

It must make you feel important that he takes such a personal interest in you though.

He even posted that he was watching another member for 3 weeks, and then followed with his usual baseless rants.

Something not quite right here

I agree that there was something pretty odd in his last post. If he actually announced that he was going to conduct a trolling campaign against another user, how is he still here?

 

[LT56]

I'm dying to know what you think the consequences of my posts are! Please continue.

I am going to be keeping a very close eye on you! Every time you post your stupid, half-baked bullshit I will insert a giant enema of truth up your fat fucking ass! I will use facts, reason, and logic to debunk every single instance of your insane bullshit! I will make you beg for mercy!

By the time I’m done you will be aimlessly wandering the halls of your local psyc ward babbling about Islamic gay frogs that are stalking you and waiting for your next injection of Haldol.

Game on!!!

 

[Bud Plug]

I am going to be keeping a very close eye on you! Every time you post your stupid, half-baked bullshit I will insert a giant enema of truth up your fat fucking ass! I will use facts, reason, and logic to debunk every single instance of your insane bullshit! I will make you beg for mercy!

By the time I’m done you will be aimlessly wandering the halls of your local psyc ward babbling about Islamic gay frogs that are stalking you and waiting for your next injection of Haldol.

Game on!!!

I doubt you'll even muster a single cogent thought, but I like your commitment to bettering yourself.

For my part, I won't be worrying about your posts at all, unless it happens to amuse me on that particular day. Same policy as present.

Since a man may be measured by his rivals, I won't be acknowledging that we are engaged in any particular contest. If you need a ladder to climb, you'll have to find a rung that's a lot closer to the bottom.

 

[Promo]

I agree that there was something pretty odd in his last post. If he actually announced that he was going to conduct a trolling campaign against another user, how is he still here?

FAST claims he has me on ignore, then claims knowledge of what I've been posting. Did FAST provide proof? Of course not because he LIED. Even you BP can put 2 + 2 together.

Like I said in a previous post your MO is transparent. I'm very aware you cowardly try to get people banned, I'm sure you've already been crying to the mods. Your comment above is laughable.

p.s. You are aware, aren't you, that YouTube already removed one of the two strikes against InfoWars, following their appeals (and YouTube's acknowledgement regarding misapplication of its policy to right wing sites)?

Really BP? Where is your proof (Don't bother posting an Infowars URL) - is this an example of a lie that I described above? One video has gone back-up, but not the one associated with the strike 2. Nothing on Google. Nothing on the news feeds. Nothing on Youtube comments. Yet today this happens: YouTube Terminates Account of InfoWars Bureau Chief Jerome Cori: https://gizmodo.com/youtube-terminates-account-of-infowars-bureau-chief-1823439792

However, let's just focus on one thing you said. blah, blah, CNN, blah, blah, MSNBC, blah, blah, Comey, Blah, blah, wikileaks, blah, blah, Hog, in gun control, blah, blah

PERFECT EXAMPLE of "redirect and reflect and try to seize on some minor side point". lolololol. You hit just every non-related subject favoured by the alt-right! What a joke!

I'm not here to help you do your research before you post. That's your job. I just enjoy pointing out when you alt-right spokesmen get all their facts wrong (sorry opinion, the right doesn't deal in facts) and watching them hang themselves when fellow my Terbites make them twist in shame.

 

[Promo]

By the time I’m done you will be aimlessly wandering the halls of your local psyc ward babbling about Islamic gay frogs that are stalking you and waiting for your next injection of Haldol.

lolol !

I see BP responded with the usual insults.

Since a man may be measured by his rivals

That must be alt-right favoured quote. No wisdom or logic in that saying

 

[mandrill]

You've done a fine job of responding to things I never wrote, as usual.

My own position on Hogg and some others is that they are junior political activists who are being coached for their appearances in the media, not that he/they are paid actors. That's not a smear on Hogg. It's a criticism of those who would seek to advance their political causes by exploiting teenagers.

The Infowars story was no different, in my view, than any number of stories you can watch on the MSM each night attributed to anonymous sources. Unreliable, but also unremarkable.

Have a look at this Bloomberg article, if you can bear the taste: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...oderators-mistakenly-pull-right-wing-channels

Now you're in fruit loop land. You seek to compare an internet troll like Jones who posts crap about gay frogs and gorilla/human/pig mutants with MSM - which happens to be a reputable news network whose politics you don't like??!!

Jones has a long record of posting absolute crap - everything from Obama being a secret Muslim to Sandy Hook never took place. The guy makes millions of $$ from lying and selling his lies. The fact that he might occasionally come up with a news item that you take seriously doesn't change the fact that he purveys crap nor does it make you a "discriminating and open minded news consumer". And it certainly doesn't change the fact that Infowars is subject to YT's user rules. YT is a private space and can publish or ban whatever / whoever they wish.

Now I know that you are going to waste everyone's time and argue this into the ground for 18 pages, so knock yourself out. Maybe you can top your previous prize-winning argument that Heather Heyer wasn't murdered.

 

[mandrill]

I doubt you'll even muster a single cogent thought, but I like your commitment to bettering yourself.

For my part, I won't be worrying about your posts at all, unless it happens to amuse me on that particular day. Same policy as present.

Since a man may be measured by his rivals, I won't be acknowledging that we are engaged in any particular contest. If you need a ladder to climb, you'll have to find a rung that's a lot closer to the bottom.

Betcha showed this post around to all your "Alt rightie" buddies, so they could see how deft you are with a witty insult, huh?

 

[OnTheWayOut]

lolol !

I see BP responded with the usual insults.

What I see is LT56 calling BP a fat ass and other assorted names. Tell me again who is insulting whom?

In fact, every time one of you guys calls someone alt-right you are hurling a huge insult. Perhaps a look in the mirror is in order.

 

[apoptygma]

What I see is LT56 calling BP a fat ass and other assorted names. Tell me again who is insulting whom?

Where did he call him a fat ass?

All I read was that LT56 was going to shove an enema UP his fat ass.

Maybe your reading comprehension skills can use some honing?

 

[OnTheWayOut]

Where did he call him a fat ass?

All I read was that LT56 was going to shove an enema UP his fat ass.

Maybe your reading comprehension skills can use some honing?

Actually he said up his "fat fucking ass". Tell me again how that is not an insult.

 

[apoptygma]

Actually he said up his "fat fucking ass". Tell me again how that is not an insult.

Thanks for proving my point.
You said he called him a fat ass. He did not. You just agreed.
Insults are subjective... BP is the King of subjectivity and should be able to agree with me (he won't though).
Ask Queen if a fat ass is an insult, and you will be sadly disappointed.