Toronto Escorts

Climate Fraud Exposed: CO2 Doesn’t Rise Up, Trap And Retain Heat

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
For while I've just been stating facts and watching you guys fall over one another trying to avoid them..
fuji facts don't count,...and I didn't avoid any of your fuji facts,...I had a good laugh.

Fact: the warming contributed by CO2 has been measured.
Fact: 90% of the green house effect that increases the planets temp.,...and always has,... is due to the water vapour positive feedback loop which is not dependent on CO2,...according to NASA.
Plus,...it is impossible to measure the effects of .04% of the atmosphere on the whole planets temperature.


Fact: CO2 increases result in water vapor increases.
Fact: Natural causes of increases in the planets temperature increases the water vapour content of the atmosphere,...as per NASA.

Fact? The planet is significantly warmer now than a hundred years ago, fifty years ago, can or thirty years ago.
Fact: The planet was significantly warmer in 1940 than 1910,...so what's your point,...if any,...???

Now go back to arguing with yourself,...you may actually win.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,012
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Fact: 90% of the green house effect that increases the planets temp.,...and always has,... is due to the water vapour positive feedback loop which is not dependent on CO2,...according to NASA.
It's certainly a feedback loop but the last part of your statement is a lie, NASA believes increases in CO2 levels result in increases in water vapor levels.


Plus,...it is impossible to measure the effects of .04% of the atmosphere on the whole planets temperature.
No it isn't and it's been done. The fact that you don't know how to do it doesn't mean others don't. I provided s lick to the study which measured is precisely and made it an observed fact.

Fact: Natural causes of increases in the planets temperature increases the water vapour content of the atmosphere,...as per NASA.
No one disputes that, but those natural factors stand what we are discussing. We are discussing how CO2 levels are what is currently driving up temperature and increasing the water vapor levels


Fact: The planet was significantly warmer in 1940 than 1910,...so what's your point,...if any,...???
The proven point, the observed fact, is that human emitted CO2 has warmed the planet quite a lot since then.
 
O

OnTheWayOut

That's all you've got? Somebody calls you out for denying reality and that's all you've got?
What? You think you called me out and there is some need on my part to respond? Your self importance knows no boundary. You said nothing close to reality and I could give a rat's ass what you think I should or should not do. I don't cater to imbeciles.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,012
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
What? You think you called me out and there is some need on my part to respond? Your self importance knows no boundary. You said nothing close to reality and I could give a rat's ass what you think I should or should not do. I don't cater to imbeciles.
I think you deny facts and that proves you're ignorant
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
25,788
3,912
113
O

OnTheWayOut

I think you deny facts and that proves you're ignorant
And I think YOU deny real facts and create fake "facts". That proves you are out of touch with reality and a lot more stupid than those you insult here.
 

Moviefan-2

Court Jester
Oct 17, 2011
10,489
171
63

Moviefan-2

Court Jester
Oct 17, 2011
10,489
171
63
Yes, all your made up "facts" are extremely questionable, thanks for letting us know you are aware.
Indeed. Not only does he not know what he's talking about, but his claims that he follows what's in the peer reviewed papers are total bullshit.

To wit:

Fuji said:
Again, that is the NET effect of man made CO2. If water vapour feedback were reducing it that would net out.
https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthrea...-Frankfooter&p=5546249&viewfull=1#post5546249

Fact: CO2 increases result in water vapor increases...
Fuji has stated that it is a "fact" that water vapour feedback has a "reducing" effect on the temperature and he has stated it is a "fact" that water vapour feedback "increases" the temperature.

Fact: Fuji doesn't know what he's talking about.

By the way, the Earth's temperature has increased by about 1 C over the past 135 years. That would hardly meet the definition of "significantly warmer," as Fuji has claimed.
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
25,788
3,912
113
^^^^^ I told you guys a long time ago fuji is a total bullshitter.

He's one of those guys who pretends to be an expert on everything just so he can impress people
 

PornAddict

Active member
Aug 30, 2009
3,620
0
36
60
^^^^^ I told you guys a long time ago fuji is a total bullshitter.

He's one of those guys who pretends to be an expert on everything just so he can impress people
Fuji reminds me of the tv shows " CHEERS" , actors Cliff Clavin from cheers. A know all bullshitter!!

Maybe we shall from hence forth call Fuji as Fuji Cliff Clavin from now on!
LOL
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,012
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Do you know what the word "if" means or are you utterly and totally illiterate?

I expected YOU believed it did, which I thought was crazy, but I also figured it was irrelevant so I wrote that statement -- featuring the word "if".

Ever since then you've been lying about what I said because you are a fundamentally dishonest person and you know you've lost the debate -- you KNOW you can't debate this topic on the merits, so you're picking inane fights with things I said back in May 2016--because in August of 2017 you have got fucking nothing to say to refute the facts.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,012
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Indeed. Not only does he not know what he's talking about, but his claims that he follows what's in the peer reviewed papers are total bullshit.

To wit:



https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthrea...-Frankfooter&p=5546249&viewfull=1#post5546249



Fuji has stated that it is a "fact" that water vapour feedback has a "reducing" effect on the temperature and he has stated it is a "fact" that water vapour feedback "increases" the temperature.

Fact: Fuji doesn't know what he's talking about.

By the way, the Earth's temperature has increased by about 1 C over the past 135 years. That would hardly meet the definition of "significantly warmer," as Fuji has claimed.
I did not state any such fact. You're a clown.

And you don't have any credible or meritorious arguments, which is why you are going back over 1 year to find things to try and criticize about the way I worded things -- which is PATHETIC. Really, sad and pathetic.

Let me just restate the FACTS that you know you can't even remotely dispute, which is why you're going off on these sideshows:

MF Claim: Temperature stopped rising in recent years
Reality: Temperature kept on rising over every 30 year interval during that time period

MF Claim: Human emitted CO2 doesn't cause global warming
Reality: Human emitted CO2 is proven to cause global warming

The most basic fact that you are impaled on is this: AGW ceased being a hypothesis a few years ago and is now simply an observation.
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
It's certainly a feedback loop but the last part of your statement is a lie, NASA believes increases in CO2 levels result in increases in water vapor levels. .
We all know what you and your self appointed unemployable experts "believe",...but religion really has no place in science fuji.

This is word for word what the 90% of the green house effect is due to,...from your "believers",...not my words.

"As the temperature of the atmosphere rises, more water is evaporated from ground storage (rivers, oceans, reservoirs, soil). Because the air is warmer, the absolute humidity can be higher (in essence, the air is able to 'hold' more water when it's warmer), leading to more water vapor in the atmosphere. As a greenhouse gas, the higher concentration of water vapor is then able to absorb more thermal IR energy radiated from the Earth, thus further warming the atmosphere. The warmer atmosphere can then hold more water vapor and so on and so on. This is referred to as a 'positive feedback loop'"

You will notice,... not once was CO2 mentioned.


No it isn't and it's been done. The fact that you don't know how to do it doesn't mean others don't. I provided s lick to the study which measured is precisely and made it an observed fact. .
Precisely measured the effects of .1 % of .04% of a gas in the atmosphere has on the whole planets temperature,...fricken hilarious
And so what,..."studies" are proven wrong every day.
Cannot be proven,...a "study" is NOT proof..


No one disputes that, but those natural factors stand what we are discussing. We are discussing how CO2 levels are what is currently driving up temperature and increasing the water vapor levels.
A good theory,...yet to be proven though.

And no,...what we are "discussing is,..."Climate Fraud Exposed".



The proven point, the observed fact, is that human emitted CO2 has warmed the planet quite a lot since then.
The planet was significantly warmer in 1940 than 1910,...and that is your reply,... :)
Has not,...and cannot be proven,...and what happened to "exactly",...now its "quite a lot",...starting to have doubts fuji,...???
 
O

OnTheWayOut

^^^^^ I told you guys a long time ago fuji is a total bullshitter.

He's one of those guys who pretends to be an expert on everything just so he can impress people
Oh Crap! I was supposed to be impressed? Doesn't that require something impressive to happen? :behindsofa:
 
Toronto Escorts