Gas-Powered Cars Will Vanish in 8 Years, Big Oil Will Collapse: Stanford Study

MattRoxx

Call me anti-fascist
Nov 13, 2011
6,752
3
0
I get around.
China leads the way in renewable technology and EVs.

https://cleantechnica.com/2017/03/0...00-fossil-fueled-taxis-beijing-electric-cars/

China Will Replace All 67,000 Fossil-Fueled Taxis In Beijing With Electric Cars

Taxis are the bane of all urban areas. Typically, they are poorly made, poorly maintained, and spew tons of carbon dioxide into the air every day as they shuttle people from place to place. Beijing has nearly 70,000 taxis. It also has an intractable problem with smog. While it has embarked on an aggressive program to encourage private citizens to buy what it calls “new energy vehicles” — hybrids, plug-in hybrids, and battery-operated cars — that push has not made much of an impact on the taxi fleet in China’s capital. Now it has announced a plan to replace all 67,000 fossil-fueled taxis in the city with electric cars.
The changeover won’t happen right away. It begins with a mandate that any new taxis placed in service must be electric, but that means it could be a decade or more before all older vehicles are replaced...
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
China leads the way in renewable technology and EVs.
70% of electricity is produced by burning coal,...so anything is an improvement for that country.
 

aldrich

Member
Feb 2, 2003
76
0
6
50
Toronto
Oil is here to stay.
The earth produces an inexhaustible supply of "fossil" fuel via the Fischer–Tropsch process.
We have all been duped into believing oil supply is finite.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Yeah, until your reactor gets split in two by an earthquake
Still doesn't release CO2. Nuclear power is going to be a major part of our response to global warming. The right doesn't like it because they're in denial about the problem and the left doesn't like it because "nuclear bad".

But if everyone would pull their heads out of their asses this is a way forward that doesn't involve crushing the economy.
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
Nuclear power is going to be a major part of our response to global warming.

But if everyone would pull their heads out of their asses this is a way forward that doesn't involve crushing the economy.
,..."crushing the economy",...ah but you see fuji,...that is the plan.
 

SkyRider

Banned
Mar 31, 2009
17,572
2
0
Apparently, the U.K. will announce that petrol and diesel vehicles will be banned by 2040. The reason is the negative impact of air pollution on people's health.
 

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,676
2,562
113
Apparently, the U.K. will announce that petrol and diesel vehicles will be banned by 2040. The reason is the negative impact of air pollution on people's health.
Your comment should read "the U.K. will announce that the sale of petrol and diesel vehicles will be banned by 2040." It's not like you won't be able to drive a gas powered car in the UK after 2040. I also suspect they'll allow the sale and use of hybrids after 2040.

Besides, it's one thing to make this statement in 2017, but things may change as we get closer to 2040. Technology will drive the change.
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,259
1,981
113
Ghawar
Has it ever been announced in what year burning coal to generate
electricity will be banned?
 

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,676
2,562
113
Canada's CANDU reactors are reliable. We've been upgrading the facilities in Ontario.
I'm not questioning their reliability. I was talking about the number of countries that are not building new or eliminating their existing nuclear reactors entirely.

Following the March 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster, Germany has permanently shut down eight of its 17 reactors and pledged to close the rest by the end of 2022. Italy voted overwhelmingly to keep their country non-nuclear. Switzerland and Spain have banned the construction of new reactors. Japan’s prime minister has called for a dramatic reduction in Japan’s reliance on nuclear power. Taiwan’s president did the same.

As of 2016, countries including Australia, Austria, Denmark, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Malta, New Zealand, Norway, Philippines, and Portugal have no nuclear power stations and remain opposed to nuclear power. Belgium, Germany, Spain and Switzerland are phasing-out nuclear power.
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,359
11
38
I'm not questioning their reliability. I was talking about the number of countries that are not building new or eliminating their existing nuclear reactors entirely.

Following the March 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster, Germany has permanently shut down eight of its 17 reactors and pledged to close the rest by the end of 2022. Italy voted overwhelmingly to keep their country non-nuclear. Switzerland and Spain have banned the construction of new reactors. Japan’s prime minister has called for a dramatic reduction in Japan’s reliance on nuclear power. Taiwan’s president did the same.

As of 2016, countries including Australia, Austria, Denmark, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Malta, New Zealand, Norway, Philippines, and Portugal have no nuclear power stations and remain opposed to nuclear power. Belgium, Germany, Spain and Switzerland are phasing-out nuclear power.
They can buy our reactors then.

What the world needs now is Fusion Power if they can make it work.
 

Hugh G. Rekshun

The 986,209,435th Beatle
Aug 21, 2001
489
4
18
T.O.
By the time oil runs out we'll be flying spaceships and conquering other planets to steal alien resources and shit.

You know its true!


(okay, so I been drinking a little tonight, but it sounds plausible right now :alien: )
It was an electric car built by GM and Boeing that was being driven on the moon 46 years ago today.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Roving_Vehicle
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xTGzesCsjs#t=07m04s

Apart from being kind of heavy to launch into space, an internal combustion engine might not have worked very well without air.
There is now a an electric racing circuit called Formula E.
I heard from someone who sat at the first turn in Montreal that everyone noticed the squealing (and smoking) tires more without as much noise from the engines.
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,259
1,981
113
Ghawar
Yeah, the light weight of a Tesla battery pack is
one big advantage over an internal combustion
engine.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,262
4,451
113
Yeah, the light weight of a Tesla battery pack is
one big advantage over an internal combustion
engine.
I've been looking at things like this as I slowly research the dream retirement boat. Thinking if solar keeps improving at some point panels(with a generator) may become viable to run an engine.

Still a fair bit off. By so am I.
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
Yeah, the light weight of a Tesla battery pack is
one big advantage over an internal combustion
engine.
1200 lbs., and doesn't include the electric motor to drive the car.
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,359
11
38
It was an electric car built by GM and Boeing that was being driven on the moon 46 years ago today.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Roving_Vehicle
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xTGzesCsjs#t=07m04s

Apart from being kind of heavy to launch into space, an internal combustion engine might not have worked very well without air.I heard from someone who sat at the first turn in Montreal that everyone noticed the squealing (and smoking) tires more without as much noise from the engines.
I think that solar-powered dune buggy on the moon had the benefit of intense sunlight without any clouds. Good reminder.

I saw a bit of the Formula E race on TV.

Did you notice that when a driver pulled into his pit stop, he got into another, replica car that was fully charged? Two cars!
 
Toronto Escorts