Obsession Massage

Air Canada Plane Nearly Lands on Crowded Taxiway

Calgacus

Banned
Feb 14, 2013
840
5
0
If 2 chicks were arguing about the pros and cons of pads vs tampons fuji would have an opinion
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
I guess I'm right and you, FAST, and James are wrong and talking out of your asses.
Actually I am right that you have never landed in a passenger plane,...that was my ONLY comment on the subject.

Other wise you would not have said some thing as asinine as,... "Pilots actually can see the runway, when they land on it"

So the pilot in that 747 that landed on another 747,...could,..."actually can see the runway",...???
 

bigshot

Active member
Aug 16, 2003
1,362
20
38
Actually I am right that you have never landed in a passenger plane,...that was my ONLY comment on the subject.

Other wise you would not have said some thing as asinine as,... "Pilots actually can see the runway, when they land on it"

So the pilot in that 747 that landed on another 747,...could,..."actually can see the runway",...???
FAsT - Don't bother responding, you'll only encourage him! It's like arguing with an idiot. They'll just beat you with experience...
 
O

OnTheWayOut

He said pilots practice low-altitude go-arounds and can perform them even 20 or 30 feet above the ground.[/color]
Considering the height of a commercial airliner is between 35 and 62 feet this appears to be problematic.

It's fun watching you make an ass of yourself over and over again.
 
O

OnTheWayOut

If 2 chicks were arguing about the pros and cons of pads vs tampons fuji would have an opinion
Yes and he would insist he won some imaginary prize even after the 2 chicks handed him his lunch :D
 

buttercup

Active member
Feb 28, 2005
2,569
4
38
Yeah, I think I watched something on that a few years ago. If I recall correctly, it was a series of unfortunate events. The planes were diverted because of a bomb threat. The conditions were poor where they were diverted. The one pilot made an unnecessary decision to refuel, rather than let the second jet by. A missed exit by the one pilot, and a miscommunication by the other. All this leading to the biggest aviation disaster in history.
There are three million commercial flights per year in N.America. If the chance of an accident were even as high as one in a million, they would average three per year.
When there is an accident, and they come to pin down the concatenation of circumstances that led to it, all of which had to go wrong at the same time, you come to realize that one in a million would be regarded as unacceptably reckless.
I read somewhere that if you took a commercial flight every day, you'd have to keep going for 28.000 years until you had an even chance of being in an accident in which someone was killed.
It's not how many flights you make -- it's making sure your number of landings exactly equals your number of takings-off.



This pilot most likely made his last commercial flight.
I hope not. He's the least likely pilot in the world to make that mistake again.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Considering the height of a commercial airliner is between 35 and 62 feet this appears to be problematic.

It's fun watching you make an ass of yourself over and over again.
Two different aviation experts each with decades of commerical flying experience both thought otherwise but keep on wowing us with your ability to pontificate.
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
24,038
3,893
113
Let's see what the real experts say:


Investigators will focus on "how did this series of errors occur, and why didn't safeguards kick in earlier than they did?" said John Cox, a safety consultant and retired airline pilot.

Cox said it was likely that even if the air traffic controllers didn't order the Air Canada plane to pull up and make another approach, the crew would have seen planes on the taxiway in time to avoid landing on them.

He said pilots practice low-altitude go-arounds and can perform them even 20 or 30 feet above the ground.


...

Chris Manno, an American Airlines pilot for 32 years who regularly lands in San Francisco, agreed that a crash was unlikely even without a command to go around.

The pilot "is not just blindly going to say, 'I'm going to land on these aircraft,'" Manno said.


http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/abort-airliner-lands-san-francisco-planes-48578093

I guess I'm right and you, FAST, and James are wrong and talking out of your asses.
Read this mon ami

https://www.thestar.com/news/canada...ng-2-planes-in-san-francisco-report-says.hAnd

But here's the thing to remember, the plane was not where it was supposed to be.

The pilot was permitted by ATC to occupy a defined path. He (the pilot) flew outside that path. The question will be why.

Its like a car going down the 401 the wrong way, or a train proceeding on a segment of track he was not authorized to be on. Even if no accident results, it is an incredibly serious safety violation. Just because the plane didn't crash into the waiting planes does not get an "all is well, shit happens" from the various aviation authorities. The pilots very competence will be questioned and their future as a pilots may most likely be ended. As I said, there may be reasons this happened, the investigation will determine that.

But this much I do know. Someone is going to pay the price for this one and it's going to be the iron price.
 

wiskey bravo

Active member
Jul 14, 2017
147
160
43
Complacency is a big enemy in any field, including us Pilots.

The aircraft was cleared for an approach which would of been the ILS for 28R. Being cleared for an approach is difference than cleared to land. Two separate clearances coming from two different controllers. Anyways that's not important here. And yes for those who don't think we look out the window to land you're wrong. There's a visual segment to an approach if weather permits meaning we look at the window and see all the pretty lights and maybe spot the hotel we are staying at:) . We are totally capable of landing ZERO ZERO visibility which means we don't see shit, however, those conditions were not present at that time and I'm not getting into Zero Zero landings. Now lets get to the story.............Picture an extended runway centre line that has vertical and horizontal tracking capabilities that operates on a VHF frequency . This course (centre line) can be intercepted at various distances but normally 10-15 miles out. Sometimes shorter. Anyways at the time of landing I don't think SFO was pushing tin, therefore, everyone was equally spaced out. Sometimes the receivers on the aircraft don't track the extended runway centre line. VHF frequencies are subject to line of sight which means obstacles can interferer. There are different holding points on taxi ways that aircraft hold short before take-off since passing that hold short line will interfere with the ILS system signal causing inaccurate tracking (vertical and horizontal) issues to aircraft on landing. Anyways I don't think that was the problem and the instruments were reading properly or maybe not. Who knows. Since the aircraft was lined up with the taxi way which was slightly right of runway 28 would display a cockpit indication of a track bar needle not centered and off to the left. To correct we point the nose of the aircraft to the left to intercept the exact inbound course which would of been probably roughly 280 degrees. Something like that. When you're on the ILS system the aircraft is designed to land 1000 feet from the threshold of the runway, therefore, I don't think it would of clipped all the airplanes that were holding short in SFO.

Anyways if everything in the cockpit was tracking properly the needle would of been slightly off to the left since they were not exactly positioned on runway 28 Inbound course. An alarm should of gone off in someone's brain saying " why isn't my f'n needle centred ". Another angle to consider, sometimes we give ourselves challenges and test our skills to see how accurate our hands and feet are so we go back to the basis and ignore the automation. I do this a lot but I never ignore the Automation. This is a perfectly safe to do. The airplane does a lot and it's important for us Pilots to keep our hands, feet, situation awareness and scan sharp. That's getting hard to accomplish since the cockpit has become pretty advanced.

One last thing and I'll end on this note. Our Duty days are 14 hours long. I depart at 7am. We start one hour before departure so the clock starts at 6am. So we can legally fly up until 8pm. With a 7am departure I start my morning at home by 3am going over all the weather for the selected airports and making sure my alternate airports are looking good. Yes for every airport there's a back up airport that's required. I also need to make sure our pre-determined fuel loads look good. Turbulence, Weather, systems moving in and how that will impact the flight.....bla bla bla....I care for all that shit and I consider my life very important. After we land it takes about 1-1.5 hours to complete post flight duties and get to the hotel. Lets recap...I woke up at 0300am. It's now 8:30 and I'm finally in my hotel room. On paper I worked 14 hours, however, it's been over 17 1/2 hours and finally getting dinner. 10 hours of rest from the time we landing to do this all over again the following day. I just cant go to bed the night before at 6pm. My eyes close around 11-1130pm. So on a day like that I normally get 3-4 hours of sleep before my early morning flight. That's why I love afternoon flights.

Guys, we fly more than you think. This business is really stretched. We breath cabin air equally too 6000 feet pressure altitude. Our days our long and being home for 10 days straight are gone.
If I had to guess they had a perfectly functioning aircraft. What happens to humans when we get tired? What starts to suffer? Safe to assume judgement and decision making diminishes? Pilot fatigue is a big issue in Aviation. Bigger than you think. I'm 41. Been flying since 20. That's all I know. I'm a rich pilot now....a tired one too.

PS - Lets wait till the reports come out. I had a few of my boys tell me they did a go around a 1000 ft. We have a 3-1 rule on landing. You're still 3 miles out from landing at that altitude. Don't always believe the media. They don't have access to aircraft recording capabilities. They true altitude of how close they were will be released soon.

WB
 

Tiger

Well-known member
Aug 20, 2013
956
331
63
Amazing post WB thank you

PS you get a lot of pussy telling stories like that, don't you? Or is it just the uniform?
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
24,038
3,893
113
Complacency is a big enemy in any field, including us Pilots.

The aircraft was cleared for an approach which would of been the ILS for 28R. Being cleared for an approach is difference than cleared to land. Two separate clearances coming from two different controllers. Anyways that's not important here. And yes for those who don't think we look out the window to land you're wrong. There's a visual segment to an approach if weather permits meaning we look at the window and see all the pretty lights and maybe spot the hotel we are staying at:) . We are totally capable of landing ZERO ZERO visibility which means we don't see shit, however, those conditions were not present at that time and I'm not getting into Zero Zero landings. Now lets get to the story.............Picture an extended runway centre line that has vertical and horizontal tracking capabilities that operates on a VHF frequency . This course (centre line) can be intercepted at various distances but normally 10-15 miles out. Sometimes shorter. Anyways at the time of landing I don't think SFO was pushing tin, therefore, everyone was equally spaced out. Sometimes the receivers on the aircraft don't track the extended runway centre line. VHF frequencies are subject to line of sight which means obstacles can interferer. There are different holding points on taxi ways that aircraft hold short before take-off since passing that hold short line will interfere with the ILS system signal causing inaccurate tracking (vertical and horizontal) issues to aircraft on landing. Anyways I don't think that was the problem and the instruments were reading properly or maybe not. Who knows. Since the aircraft was lined up with the taxi way which was slightly right of runway 28 would display a cockpit indication of a track bar needle not centered and off to the left. To correct we point the nose of the aircraft to the left to intercept the exact inbound course which would of been probably roughly 280 degrees. Something like that. When you're on the ILS system the aircraft is designed to land 1000 feet from the threshold of the runway, therefore, I don't think it would of clipped all the airplanes that were holding short in SFO.

Anyways if everything in the cockpit was tracking properly the needle would of been slightly off to the left since they were not exactly positioned on runway 28 Inbound course. An alarm should of gone off in someone's brain saying " why isn't my f'n needle centred ". Another angle to consider, sometimes we give ourselves challenges and test our skills to see how accurate our hands and feet are so we go back to the basis and ignore the automation. I do this a lot but I never ignore the Automation. This is a perfectly safe to do. The airplane does a lot and it's important for us Pilots to keep our hands, feet, situation awareness and scan sharp. That's getting hard to accomplish since the cockpit has become pretty advanced.

One last thing and I'll end on this note. Our Duty days are 14 hours long. I depart at 7am. We start one hour before departure so the clock starts at 6am. So we can legally fly up until 8pm. With a 7am departure I start my morning at home by 3am going over all the weather for the selected airports and making sure my alternate airports are looking good. Yes for every airport there's a back up airport that's required. I also need to make sure our pre-determined fuel loads look good. Turbulence, Weather, systems moving in and how that will impact the flight.....bla bla bla....I care for all that shit and I consider my life very important. After we land it takes about 1-1.5 hours to complete post flight duties and get to the hotel. Lets recap...I woke up at 0300am. It's now 8:30 and I'm finally in my hotel room. On paper I worked 14 hours, however, it's been over 17 1/2 hours and finally getting dinner. 10 hours of rest from the time we landing to do this all over again the following day. I just cant go to bed the night before at 6pm. My eyes close around 11-1130pm. So on a day like that I normally get 3-4 hours of sleep before my early morning flight. That's why I love afternoon flights.

Guys, we fly more than you think. This business is really stretched. We breath cabin air equally too 6000 feet pressure altitude. Our days our long and being home for 10 days straight are gone.
If I had to guess they had a perfectly functioning aircraft. What happens to humans when we get tired? What starts to suffer? Safe to assume judgement and decision making diminishes? Pilot fatigue is a big issue in Aviation. Bigger than you think. I'm 41. Been flying since 20. That's all I know. I'm a rich pilot now....a tired one too.

PS - Lets wait till the reports come out. I had a few of my boys tell me they did a go around a 1000 ft. We have a 3-1 rule on landing. You're still 3 miles out from landing at that altitude. Don't always believe the media. They don't have access to aircraft recording capabilities. They true altitude of how close they were will be released soon.

WB
Well, that's a hell of a first post.
 

Zoot Allures

Well-known member
Jan 23, 2017
2,021
787
113
Complacency is a big enemy in any field, including us Pilots.

The aircraft was cleared for an approach which would of been the ILS for 28R. Being cleared for an approach is difference than cleared to land. Two separate clearances coming from two different controllers. Anyways that's not important here. And yes for those who don't think we look out the window to land you're wrong. There's a visual segment to an approach if weather permits meaning we look at the window and see all the pretty lights and maybe spot the hotel we are staying at:) . We are totally capable of landing ZERO ZERO visibility which means we don't see shit, however, those conditions were not present at that time and I'm not getting into Zero Zero landings. Now lets get to the story.............Picture an extended runway centre line that has vertical and horizontal tracking capabilities that operates on a VHF frequency . This course (centre line) can be intercepted at various distances but normally 10-15 miles out. Sometimes shorter. Anyways at the time of landing I don't think SFO was pushing tin, therefore, everyone was equally spaced out. Sometimes the receivers on the aircraft don't track the extended runway centre line. VHF frequencies are subject to line of sight which means obstacles can interferer. There are different holding points on taxi ways that aircraft hold short before take-off since passing that hold short line will interfere with the ILS system signal causing inaccurate tracking (vertical and horizontal) issues to aircraft on landing. Anyways I don't think that was the problem and the instruments were reading properly or maybe not. Who knows. Since the aircraft was lined up with the taxi way which was slightly right of runway 28 would display a cockpit indication of a track bar needle not centered and off to the left. To correct we point the nose of the aircraft to the left to intercept the exact inbound course which would of been probably roughly 280 degrees. Something like that. When you're on the ILS system the aircraft is designed to land 1000 feet from the threshold of the runway, therefore, I don't think it would of clipped all the airplanes that were holding short in SFO.

Anyways if everything in the cockpit was tracking properly the needle would of been slightly off to the left since they were not exactly positioned on runway 28 Inbound course. An alarm should of gone off in someone's brain saying " why isn't my f'n needle centred ". Another angle to consider, sometimes we give ourselves challenges and test our skills to see how accurate our hands and feet are so we go back to the basis and ignore the automation. I do this a lot but I never ignore the Automation. This is a perfectly safe to do. The airplane does a lot and it's important for us Pilots to keep our hands, feet, situation awareness and scan sharp. That's getting hard to accomplish since the cockpit has become pretty advanced.

One last thing and I'll end on this note. Our Duty days are 14 hours long. I depart at 7am. We start one hour before departure so the clock starts at 6am. So we can legally fly up until 8pm. With a 7am departure I start my morning at home by 3am going over all the weather for the selected airports and making sure my alternate airports are looking good. Yes for every airport there's a back up airport that's required. I also need to make sure our pre-determined fuel loads look good. Turbulence, Weather, systems moving in and how that will impact the flight.....bla bla bla....I care for all that shit and I consider my life very important. After we land it takes about 1-1.5 hours to complete post flight duties and get to the hotel. Lets recap...I woke up at 0300am. It's now 8:30 and I'm finally in my hotel room. On paper I worked 14 hours, however, it's been over 17 1/2 hours and finally getting dinner. 10 hours of rest from the time we landing to do this all over again the following day. I just cant go to bed the night before at 6pm. My eyes close around 11-1130pm. So on a day like that I normally get 3-4 hours of sleep before my early morning flight. That's why I love afternoon flights.

Guys, we fly more than you think. This business is really stretched. We breath cabin air equally too 6000 feet pressure altitude. Our days our long and being home for 10 days straight are gone.
If I had to guess they had a perfectly functioning aircraft. What happens to humans when we get tired? What starts to suffer? Safe to assume judgement and decision making diminishes? Pilot fatigue is a big issue in Aviation. Bigger than you think. I'm 41. Been flying since 20. That's all I know. I'm a rich pilot now....a tired one too.

PS - Lets wait till the reports come out. I had a few of my boys tell me they did a go around a 1000 ft. We have a 3-1 rule on landing. You're still 3 miles out from landing at that altitude. Don't always believe the media. They don't have access to aircraft recording capabilities. They true altitude of how close they were will be released soon.

WB
I do not understand pilot fatigue. You are unionized in a heavily regulated industry where safety is paramount. Pilot fatigue should never be an issue.
 

Keebler Elf

The Original Elf
Aug 31, 2001
14,618
239
63
The Keebler Factory
I think it's pretty clear to almost everyone in this thread that this was a critical failure and a disaster waiting to happen. Fuji can protest all he wants and scrounge for internet scraps to cobble together an argument to support his (flawed) view but we all know it was really bad.

Experts 1.

Fuji 0.
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
I think it's pretty clear to almost everyone in this thread that this was a critical failure and a disaster waiting to happen. Fuji can protest all he wants and scrounge for internet scraps to cobble together an argument to support his (flawed) view but we all know it was really bad.

Experts 1.

Fuji 0.
Pretty much unaminous,....
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
I do not understand pilot fatigue. You are unionized in a heavily regulated industry where safety is paramount. Pilot fatigue should never be an issue.
Read the pilots post.

Should be,...and reality are not always related.
 

wiskey bravo

Active member
Jul 14, 2017
147
160
43
I do not understand pilot fatigue. You are unionized in a heavily regulated industry where safety is paramount. Pilot fatigue should never be an issue.
I grew up pretty poor, therefore, I had to work my ass to pay off the student loan (110k). I'm sure there's many of us out there right? I hope:). Anyways finding my first job was pretty hard. Before then I worked a normal 9 - 5 job that included a 1 hour break. Basically an 8 hour day. I did feel more rested with those hours. Like I said above I'm legal to fly 14 uninterrupted hours on any day. That's a regulated rule by the government and union. Is there anything wrong with that? I just told you what my typical duty day looks like. You be the judge. I also told you that I'm tired and I'm not the only one. People can choose to listen or question it. If your Surgeon silently cries he's tired, I would listen. Captain Sully (the one who landed on the Hudson) took his fame and tried to do additional good by bringing up Pilot safety concerns. The Crash in Buffalo a few years back - Pilot fatigue. I have always referred to myself as a glorified taxi cab driver. My first job was an instructor. Salary was 10k a year. It was below minimum wage and Transport Canada is aware there's many operators that take advantage of young inspiring Pilots that pay below minimum wage. You know how many little private Cessna's that fly the skies with Pilots that don't keep their medical's current because they are no longer fit to fly. Or how about removing the transponder from the aircraft and flying under the radar so ATC cannot find you. There are broken airplanes that actually do lift off the ground from little private airports that shouldn't be in the air. So there I just mentioned a few dark corners in Aviation, a highly regulated industry. Everything cannot be controlled to the extent you think it is. What I brought up is completely not related to the primary discussion at hand, however, I'm providing some insight to an industry that carry's cracks. The trucking business is regulated, however, there's still tires flying into cars and drivers going over their required hours behind the wheel. Such is life.

We as Pilots do have the right to speak and express our concerns which we have. We try to be discrete and professional when dealing with any problems. We don't block the streets of Toronto to get our message across. We go to work, shut up and sleep in the bed we support. It's called owning it, even if the picture isn't pretty.

Lastly, there's a big shortage in the industry and the Salaries are rising. It's a tough business to break. It's not perfect nor will it ever be. This career required a lot of motivation and determination since the first 10 years pays pretty poorly. Making 200k takes about 15-20 years which is totally fine. It kept me focused and on point. Wasn't interested in hanging out at pool halls or watching my friends do drugs. When you fuck up you can really hurt or possible kill yourself. I'v always learned through my mistakes and I'm fortunate my mistakes during my student years were not deep enough to hurt me. I had a few close calls tho. Anyways not a bad time to get in the business if you're interested.

Guy's, it's safe to fly so don't be scared. Us pilots want to come home. My interest is making it safer. We can never be too safe. There has been more Pilot incidents. Guys I'm telling you - we are tired. When mechanical aircraft parts go tired they break. So do humans.

Keep it professional boys regardless what you do.

WB
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
WB

Got a question for you, unrelated to this thread if you don't mind.

On the little Air Buss joy sticks,...is the one off to the right corner for a right handed pilot,...and the one to off the left corner for a left handed pilot,...just kidding.

Really,...what do you guys think of the little Air Buss joy sticks of in the corners off the cock pit, as apposed to the classic Boeing style yokes,...???

Thanks, FAST
 

wiskey bravo

Active member
Jul 14, 2017
147
160
43
Amazing post WB thank you

PS you get a lot of pussy telling stories like that, don't you? Or is it just the uniform?
hahaha. Not so much on the road. I actually don't enjoy picking up on the road, therefore, I don't try. Plus I want something log term and in my own city. Fortunately I have my hair and looks still, therefore, I can attract without the uniform but it does help when it's on. hahah. Dating in Toronto is tricky. I noticed the girls in the city or looking for an individual who has a career and they appreciate one that does. Why did I just bring up the topic of dating in Toronto which by the way is brutal......
 

wiskey bravo

Active member
Jul 14, 2017
147
160
43
WB

Got a question for you, unrelated to this thread if you don't mind.

On the little Air Buss joy sticks,...is the one off to the right corner for a right handed pilot,...and the one to off the left corner for a left handed pilot,...just kidding.

Really,...what do you guys think of the little Air Buss joy sticks of in the corners off the cock pit, as apposed to the classic Boeing style yokes,...???

Thanks, FAST
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kERSSRJant0&t=210s

Let me know what you think.....
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts