CNN blackmail Reddit user over trump wrestling video threaten to expose his identity

[slowandeasy]

Ha ha.

At least I can acknowledge that the word 'specific' with regard to information was not present in one of my 2 posts on the subject matter that you have taken extreme umbrage with and become so outraged about. Such a pettiness you have displayed with regard to one word consisting of 8 letters.

However, it is painfully and shamefully obvious that you are unable to and incapable of providing proof of your ludicrous claim that CNN committed an assault to subvert the constitutionally guaranteed rights of an individual. Talk about just making 'shit up'!

I suggest that you 'fact check' and 'proof read' your misleading, false and fake statement so that you don't find yourself in a predicament of own your making that causes you to attempt to wriggle and squirm your way out of.

I stopped reading after the first sentence. When your first sentence (although nicely written), but contains fatal flaws, there is no point reading the rest.

But you are a funny man. First, the "extreme umbrage and outrage" you refer to comes from yourself, not me.

As far as 8 little letters not being important, you cannot be more wrong. Take this sentence for example "Anabarandy, you have been found guilty of murder". Now inert 3 little letters in that sentence and you have completely different sentence.

I could not help myself, I did read the second line of your post, and it was just as flawed as the first.

Come on man, you write very well and seem to have a great deal of intelligence, but please use it for good, not this other nonsense that is being passed off as being good.

 

[Anbarandy]

I stopped reading after the first sentence. When your first sentence (although nicely written), but contains fatal flaws, there is no point reading the rest.

But you are a funny man. First, the "extreme umbrage and outrage" you refer to comes from yourself, not me.

As far as 8 little letters not being important, you cannot be more wrong. Take this sentence for example "Anabarandy, you have been found guilty of murder". Now inert 3 little letters in that sentence and you have completely different sentence.

I could not help myself, I did read the second line of your post, and it was just as flawed as the first.

Come on man, you write very well and seem to have a great deal of intelligence, but please use it for good, not this other nonsense that is being passed off as being good.

Such a KellyAnne-esque reply, touche!

However, it is painfully and shamefully obvious that you are unable to and incapable of providing proof of your ludicrous claim that CNN committed an assault to subvert the constitutionally guaranteed rights of an individual. Talk about just making 'shit up'!

Where is the proof, show me the proof, I don't see the proof, do you see the proof?

It must suck to have your statements fact checked and proof read, huh?

 

[slowandeasy]

Such a KellyAnne-esque reply, touche!

However, it is painfully and shamefully obvious that you are unable to and incapable of providing proof of your ludicrous claim that CNN committed an assault to subvert the constitutionally guaranteed rights of an individual. Talk about just making 'shit up'!

Where is the proof, show me the proof, I don't see the proof, do you see the proof?

It must suck to have your statements fact checked and proof read, huh?

Lol.. l was truly hoping you would be able to figure it out yourself. You seem like a decent sort and I dont want to embarrass you, but you keep persisting. The reason I have ignored you is:
1. that I dont have to prove anything to you about
my "claim". It was my opinion, you are free to
agree or disagree with it as you please
2. Dont hold your breath, but when I have moment, I
will review and try to provide you an appropriate
response?

 

[Butler1000]

Lol.. l was truly hoping you would be able to figure it out yourself. You seem like a decent sort and I dont want to embarrass you, but you keep persisting. The reason I have ignored you is:
1. that I dont have to prove anything to you about
my "claim". It was my opinion, you are free to
agree or disagree with it as you please
2. Dont hold your breath, but when I have moment, I
will review and try to provide you an appropriate
response?

He spends a lot of time at Cheers when he isn't on his mail route. Don't mind ol' Cliff he can't help himself.

 

[Anbarandy]

He spends a lot of time at Cheers when he isn't on his mail route. Don't mind ol' Cliff he can't help himself.

Oh look, it's the event planner and 'C' list celebrity hairstylist who has spent and spends 2/3rds of his existence defending Rob Ford and Donald J. Trump.

 

[Anbarandy]

Lol.. l was truly hoping you would be able to figure it out yourself. You seem like a decent sort and I dont want to embarrass you, but you keep persisting. The reason I have ignored you is:
1. that I dont have to prove anything to you about
my "claim". It was my opinion, you are free to
agree or disagree with it as you please
2. Dont hold your breath, but when I have moment, I
will review and try to provide you an appropriate
response?

Oh so now it's just an opinion because you can't provide any proof to back up your original accusation.

You're treading into Trump territory now.

I now understand you quite well.

Thanks for clearing it all up.

Take Care.

 

[Butler1000]

Oh look, it's the event planner and 'C' list celebrity hairstylist who has spent and spends 2/3rds of his existence defending Rob Ford and Donald J. Trump.

Lol. Your name calling and pontificating finally got the better of me. I can just see you standing around the bar as everyone shakes their head at the latest........

Cnn is guilty because they, by their own admission, threatened to publicly disclose his identity. And stated publicly that they were going to hold that threat over his head if he ever spoke out again.

If that isn't a 1st amendment violation I don't know what is.

So your long winded asinine diatribe isn't worth the electricity to keep and maintain the pixels on the server.

But you correct I'm a nobody. Just not what you think.

 

[Anbarandy]

U obviously don't know the 1st Amendment.

Journalists and those who report and offer much more qualified analysis and opinion are public, they are named, they show their faces to the public. They are known and take accountability.

This so-called anonymous reddit poster or whatever the term is, hides in the shadows and puts out racist, hateful and inciting to violence 'so-called free speech' under the cloak of darkness and takes no accountability for his actions.

I did not know that the 1st Amendment constitutionally guarantees the right of an individual to remain anonymous as he publicly declares hateful, racist speech which also condones and promotes violence.

WE would want to know who these people are, don't u think?

There is an ongoing assault on the 1st Amendment and it's source is Trump and those who support and promote the assault.

 

[Butler1000]

U obviously don't know the 1st Amendment.

Journalists and those who report and offer much more qualified analysis and opinion are public, they are named, they show their faces to the public. They are known and take accountability.

This so-called anonymous reddit poster or whatever the term is, hides in the shadows and puts out racist, hateful and inciting to violence 'so-called free speech' under the cloak of darkness and takes no accountability for his actions.

I did not know that the 1st Amendment constitutionally guarantees the right of an individual to remain anonymous as he publicly declares hateful, racist speech which also condones and promotes violence.

WE would want to know who these people are, don't u think?

There is an ongoing assault on the 1st Amendment and it's source is Trump and those who support and promote the assault.

You do realize the vast majority of the supposed information on Trump is coming from anonymous sources protected by the first amendment from having to be revealed right?

In other words the right to anonymity is protected by the 1st amendment. Unless you are now saying reporters sources should not be protected now.

In nations around the world anonymity to Espouse a political view is vital to democracy. And saves lives.

CNN blackmailed the man. It's that simple. It's why they have now lost so much more of their credibility. They did it to shut him up. Stifling free speech is at its core a 1st amendment violation. Especially using criminal actions to do so.

 

[Butler1000]

And ask yourself this simple question.

If it was Fox News that had done it with a Hillary Gif as the winner, would you still denounce things as you are now?

 

[Anbarandy]

You do realize the vast majority of the supposed information on Trump is coming from anonymous sources protected by the first amendment from having to be revealed right?

In other words the right to anonymity is protected by the 1st amendment. Unless you are now saying reporters sources should not be protected now.

In nations around the world anonymity to Espouse a political view is vital to democracy. And saves lives.

CNN blackmailed the man. It's that simple. It's why they have now lost so much more of their credibility. They did it to shut him up. Stifling free speech is at its core a 1st amendment violation. Especially using criminal actions to do so.

What political view was that reddit guy espousing? Get real.

You are conflating 'anonymous sources' who provide corroborated and vetted 'information' that is deemed to be newsworthy with respect to holding into account those in positions of power over others with an anonymous individuals who are not espousing a political view, but who are just espousing hate, racism and violence.

Notice how recalcitrant this individual became when all of sudden the prospect of his cloak of anonymity that he cowered behind for espousing his hate, racism and violence would maybe not be so all encompassing.

 

[Anbarandy]

And ask yourself this simple question.

If it was Fox News that had done it with a Hillary Gif as the winner, would you still denounce things as you are now?

If the individual was not espousing a political view but just spewing hate, racism and inciting violence ..... then yes.

 

[Anbarandy]

There is an unprecedented and ongoing assault not only on the 1st Amendment, but on the institutions of government and it's source is Trump and those who support and promote the assault.

 

[Butler1000]

What political view was that reddit guy espousing? Get real.

You are conflating 'anonymous sources' who provide corroborated and vetted 'information' that is deemed to be newsworthy with respect to holding into account those in positions of power over others with an anonymous individuals who are not espousing a political view, but who are just espousing hate, racism and violence.

Notice how recalcitrant this individual became when all of sudden the prospect of his cloak of anonymity that he cowered behind for espousing his hate, racism and violence would maybe not be so all encompassing.

Espousing the view that Trump was winning the present political and ideological war that CNN has been waging.

CNN has, by their own doing, gone beyond being a neutral News source. That are in fact no better than Breibart or Huffington the post at this point in their specific targeting of Trump. It isn't about reporting any more. It's about attacking.

They are pretty blatent about it, and their choices in pundits and content as well.

And after their direct collusion with Clinton discovered due to the hack they can no longer claim to be independent. Nor the recent Veritas videos that show producers and a major on air contributor discussing the bias.

And in doing so, becoming a de facto propaganda arm of the DNC, just as Fox is for the RNC, it becomes a 1st amendment issue.

And they weren't threatening to expose him over what ever elesr he wrote. They specifically sought him out solely due the the Meme that they felt embarrassed them.

No meme. No blackmail. And they, like every other entity that would try a stunt like this. Are paying a price right now. The worst price a news organization can get pay.

Loss of credibility. They no longer have the ability to sway swing voters. Only to preach to the converted.

 

[Butler1000]

There is an unprecedented and ongoing assault not only on the 1st Amendment, but on the institutions of government and it's source is Trump and those who support and promote the assault.

It's an assault on a no longer unbaised media. That's the key here. CNN, Fox and MSNBC are all no longer credible for being unbiased full stop. They are in it for the money and as propaganda arms for the two parties. That is how low it has sunk. You can't trust any of them. The various reactions on election night alone showed the bias.

As for gov't institutions 95% of DC voted Democrat. There is a deep state.

 

[slowandeasy]

Oh so now it's just an opinion because you can't provide any proof to back up your original accusation.

You're treading into Trump territory now.

I now understand you quite well.

Thanks for clearing it all up.

Take Care.

Now you are just acting the fool. It was always an opinion. You tried to change it, that has nothing to do with me.

I had given you the benefit of the doubt for being a decent guy, but you are losing points.

 

[Anbarandy]

Espousing the view that Trump was winning the present political and ideological war that CNN has been waging.

CNN has, by their own doing, gone beyond being a neutral News source. That are in fact no better than Breibart or Huffington the post at this point in their specific targeting of Trump. It isn't about reporting any more. It's about attacking.

They are pretty blatent about it, and their choices in pundits and content as well.

And after their direct collusion with Clinton discovered due to the hack they can no longer claim to be independent. Nor the recent Veritas videos that show producers and a major on air contributor discussing the bias.

And in doing so, becoming a de facto propaganda arm of the DNC, just as Fox is for the RNC, it becomes a 1st amendment issue.

And they weren't threatening to expose him over what ever elesr he wrote. They specifically sought him out solely due the the Meme that they felt embarrassed them.

No meme. No blackmail. And they, like every other entity that would try a stunt like this. Are paying a price right now. The worst price a news organization can get pay.

Loss of credibility. They no longer have the ability to sway swing voters. Only to preach to the converted.

It's an assault on a no longer unbaised media. That's the key here. CNN, Fox and MSNBC are all no longer credible for being unbiased full stop. They are in it for the money and as propaganda arms for the two parties. That is how low it has sunk. You can't trust any of them. The various reactions on election night alone showed the bias.

As for gov't institutions 95% of DC voted Democrat. There is a deep state.

If you say so.

 

[fuji]

And ask yourself this simple question.

If it was Fox News that had done it with a Hillary Gif as the winner, would you still denounce things as you are now?

Trump supporters constantly post people's real names, usually along with some lie about them that results in a zillion death threats. Brietbart did it constantly while Bannon was in charge. Still does. The right wing zombies here on terb have even come and pasted these things into threads here.

Why are only only now upset about it?

 

[Butler1000]

Trump supporters constantly post people's real names, usually along with some lie about them that results in a zillion death threats. Brietbart did it constantly while Bannon was in charge. Still does. The right wing zombies here on terb have even come and pasted these things into threads here.

Why are only only now upset about it?

Ah. So now you admit CNN acted just like a Breibart Troll.

You see I insulted in my posts Huffington and Breibart and there ilk. I don't link to them nor read them nor expect to find much of value in their reportage. They are a biased source. Sometimes there is truth but it's twisted.

So here you go. As a rule those who would out a non governmental sworn to secrecy source are wrong. Those who would go after and Dox a private citizen for a meme(which is in my opinion a modern political cartoon) are wrong. On any side of the equation.

I've never complained about a single cartoon on anyone's sig here either. Just mock all who feel the need for a big one.

But thank you for saying what CNN has done is what Breibart has done. It's exactly the point I've been espousing. That the three cable news networks aren't much better. That they have crossed the line into propaganda. And that everything they broadcast should be treated with the same skepticism as something from the sites I've mentioned.

CNN really crossed the line. Did so publicly. And now are tagged for what they have become.

 

[SuperCharge]

Argue back and forth all you want, at the end of the day, CNN made their bed and now they are gonna have to sleep in it.

CNN reserves the right to publish a private citizens name over a MEME, no problem, and WE reserve the right to fight them every step of the way. Two can play that game!

Corrupt News Network is dying, a slow, agonising death by suicide. Looks good on 'em.