LOL...I consider that a complimentDo Caucasian people find this offensive? If so, why?
LOL...I consider that a complimentDo Caucasian people find this offensive? If so, why?
Symbols are always open to interpretation. Warplanes are undeniably a symbol of death and destruction because that is what they are made for. How is it suddenly not offensive to display them in a museum and have kids climb in the cockpit? Do you explain to kids what the guns or the missiles on the plane are used for? The Union Jack, American flag and many others can arguably represent conquest, colonialism and maybe even slavery. Millions of people around the world including American and British citizens already see them as offensive, which is why people burn flags.Everyone of your examples above is what's known as a false equivalency. None of them are symbols of slavery and none of them are offensive to millions of people. And it's not a question of "any one person", its a question of millions of people and what that flag represents. Your examples just are not the same thing.
I'm not saying that the owner of that car is a racist. I'm saying he's inconsiderate. (As an aside, I don't think that car is the original "General Lee" from the Dukes of Hazard TV show. I think it's just a similar car that some guy painted up in the same way. BTW, being a dyed in the wool car guy myself, I cannot fathom ruining a car like that with a paint job like that. It didn't come from the factory like that, it's a sin.)
Times change. What was socially acceptable 100 years ago (confederate flags and putting up statues of Nathan Bedford Forrest, or Robert E Lee or Jeff Davis) are no longer acceptable.
White supremacy and slavery and the history that goes with it cannot be discounted as merely "suck it up cry baby".
People today including you or any of your family cannot truly relate to that terrible period of American history. The generation of people that lived through that time are long gone.You obviously cannot relate, you can't even empathize since you or your family members have never been in that situation.
We'll never know for sure what happened before and after the video was shot. It could have been a normal conversation that escalated into what we saw. It could also have started that way.I think you're right on the incomplete footage, and the fact that she shot the video tells me she wasn't looking for dialogue when she approached the owner. I've got no love for her...
But the owner chose to buy the car as it was shown in the video or refinished it to look the way it does. It didn't seem like it was the first time he had ever considered what the flag might represent to some, based on his responses.
Just my interpretation.
You seem like a reasonable person, so hypothetically speaking, if you owned that car, would you drive it to a Scarborough community festival?
Yea I've been wondering this myself. In-particular about the flags. Colonialism and imperialism, can't really be separated from the flags, even if what they've come to represent in our country today is different from what they represented at the height of each nation's power.
History does love a winner.
Absolutely.
I want to believe with a different overall approach, she could have made a positive social impact.
She chose aggression, which rarely makes me change my mind either.
Supreme Court just ruled it isn't. Great win for the 'redskins'. A major victory for free speech. BLM will love it, now they can trademark their name lol.We've run this through in the past is the following offensive?
Perhaps B.N.A recalled it had only been fifty- some years since the last invasion from the US, and reasoned that a hostile nation to their south after the war would re-focus the attention of the northern States. Certainly the eventual victory of the North, and the prospect of its enormous and well-equipped army just across the undefended border, at loose ends and bitter about English gun-running to their enemies, was a spur to our Confederation 149 years and 355 days ago.A certain irony as well given that although men from British North America volunteered to serve in the Union Army and Navy, B.N.A. was not unfriendly to the Confederacy indeed Confederate Agents operated openly and took action against U.S. interests.
You can add the stars and stripes and union jack to that list. Native Americans and British colonies have their own list of atrocities suffered under those flags. Flying a Confederate flag at government building pays tribute to a set of values that are wrong and I can see that. There is 70's-80's cultural association of the flag void of references to slavery that simply identifies the location of people as designated geographically by the confederate states and attributing a simple hillbilly life style of country folk. The use of the flag on the dukes of hazzard show was such a use to reinforce this southern hillbilly local in the plot. As I watched the Dukes of Hazzard .. okay Daisy Duke .. on TV without ever associating it to slavery, it seems strange to hear protests on the car in a cultural presentation. Yeah, I get it but I don't think the protesting lady does.The Japanese killed millions in WWII.
Should we ban all references to the Rising Sun flag.
The Germans killed millions in WWII as well ,so the swastika has to go in all museums,tv shows,movies etc.
Actually any peoples that killed other groups,races,etc & had a flag should also be banned.
I'm not sure there would be many countries exempted, but surely someone will be offended.
Or just maybe we can learn the truth from history and use those symbols to remember the evil to try to help the world not to repeat it.
Forget history at your own peril.
This is true but some people need to watch the show to realize the rebel flag on the car doesn't symbolize pro slavery. It simply has to do with being an outlaw hence why they are always running from the sheriff.The flag obviously means different things to different people, so let's just leave it at that.
Very classy response.We'll never know for sure what happened before and after the video was shot. It could have been a normal conversation that escalated into what we saw. It could also have started that way.
If I was the owner of that car I would go to the community festival only if invited. It is plausible that the driver might have crashed the festival without an invitation, but there's no evidence to suggest that. The driver likely poured lots of time and money into acquiring the car, parts, engine, paint color, etc. It was his pride and joy. In his position, I would also be upset it some random woman came up to me and started yelling at me about how offended she was, etc. It could be the driver just does not know the history of said flag, but that is obviously a wild speculation not based on any facts.
If I was approached calmly by the organizer or a random person not to display the car, I probably would comply out of respect assuming any fees would be refunded of course.
All this discussion has got me thinking that videos like this need to be integrated into the classroom somehow. It's a good exercise IMO, to take apart micro moments like this to try to understand what is going in a calm rational way. It is way too easy to have a visceral response to things these days without stopping for a second to think.
Yet the NCAA declared that the below was an offensive image.Supreme Court just ruled it isn't.[/URL] Great win for the 'redskins'. A major victory for free speech.
Sure Kat, sure. Nazi history happened too. Should that symbol be used as a 'harmless' logo in a new show? That piece of shit flag flew under the radar due to ignorance and lack of caring. So while USA were jostling to take down the Nazis they were lynching negroes back home. And do remember that the KKK were still active and allowed to get away with murder well into the 1980s draped in that filth of a flag!!!!! You think White Supremacy was checking for black people's feelings back then? So that explains it cheekily sneaking by into mainstream.I you ask me, she was far more disruptive to the event than the car. There was no need for swearing and losing control at a community event. If she was too overwhelmed, why not just leave?
The car is not a symbol of hate, and that flag should not be banned. You can't pretend history didn't happen by removing elements of it.
I loved watching the Dukes growing up, and that car was very popular at the Hamilton comic con. There was a huge enthusiastic line to get a photo with it, and John Schneider. Now because one person gets 'triggered', the event manager would perhaps stop that car from coming in. No regard for the people that loved the show, or the car.
Further, this was one car, at a random event. What about those people selling flags on city corners? I always see confederate flags among the ones on display, and it doesn't make the news. All it takes, is one complaint or meltdown.
You worked that one out because they didn't come out and say that their car is a warning to darkies to back the 'f' up?that car is a legend and has abso-fuckin-lutely nothing to do with racism - anybody who has seen that show would understand, things need to be looked at in context and not out of context...jeez
"The symbol should only be judged in context."