Yes. Do you?Once again,...do even know what "peer" means fuji,...???
And now you have snuck in "fuji quality",...it's kooky bullshit.
Yes. Do you?Once again,...do even know what "peer" means fuji,...???
And now you have snuck in "fuji quality",...it's kooky bullshit.
Yes. Do you?
I'm this case it means the articles are reviewed by experts in the field who only allow the publication of the highest quality science.Once again,...do even know what "peer" means fuji,...???
Good fuji squirm,...still waiting,...
As you have posted over and over again,...By their peers,...I'm this case it means the articles are reviewed by experts in the field who only allow the publication of the highest quality science..
I do realize you have declared you are an elite,...but you don't get to decide,... "what Other articles can be ignored",...what ever the fuck that means,...Other articles on the topic can be ignored for our purposes.
You don't understand peer review. You are making a ridiculous fool of yourself.As you have posted over and over again,...By their peers,...
"Peer pressure is the direct influence on people by peers, or an individual who gets encouraged to follow their peers by changing their attitudes, values, or behaviors to conform to those of the influencing group or individual".
I do realize you have declared you are an elite,...but you don't get to decide,... "what Other articles can be ignored",...what ever the fuck that means,...
And if you did,...you would have stated something with any substance by now,...other than your time honoured posting of personal insults,... you have nothing to offer again.You don't understand peer review. You are making a ridiculous fool of yourself.
Just a few years ago, several members of Greenpeace destroyed a UNESCO World Heritage site in Peru before fleeing the country to avoid prosecution
https://news.vice.com/article/drone...f-damage-from-greenpeace-stunt-at-nazca-lines
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ear...tifiable-in-fight-against-climate-change.html
GreenPeace supports breaking laws for supporting the climate change scam
Ya and donald trump is unstable.Published on May 1, 2017
In a very special #LwC, for one full hour, we sat down with Dr. Patrick Moore, PHD in Ecology and founder of Greenpeace, and dissected the scam that is modern "climate change".
I'm not going to educate you on what "peer reviewed journal" is, you can go google that. You're just being an idiot here, arguing about stuff you don't understand, for no reason.And if you did,...you would have stated something with any substance by now,...other than your time honoured posting of personal insults,... you have nothing to offer again.
I'll try to simplify things for YA again fuji,...think The Canadian Bar Association,...as a good example of peer review,...one can not get any more corrupt than that,...well maybe except for the self proclaimed "Climatology experts" clubs.
There are more examples of self policing, self gratification,...let me know if you need any more,...always here to help you fuji,...
Said the one who thinks C02 will lead to a food shortage when over 95% of plantation grows faster from the greenhouse effect.lolI'm not going to educate you on what "peer reviewed journal" is, you can go google that. You're just being an idiot here, arguing about stuff you don't understand, for no reason.
so you can't debunk the articles showing green peace breaking the law destroying historical sites so you resort to insultsPlease change your handle... you are embarrassing the whole nation
BLah,...blah,...blah..:blabla:
I stand by the prediction. The areas that are farmable will change. In Canada the prairies will experience drought and while the Canadian shield will grow more trees, it isn't farmable.Said the one who thinks C02 will lead to a food shortage when over 95% of plantation grows faster from the greenhouse effect.lol
Troll. You don't have a fucking clue what you are talking about. You don't know what a peer review journal is. Your arguing for no reason about things you don't understand... Stupidly cuts and pasted my post....
WRONG! Wake up man.97% of scientists believe climate change is real and man-made. Most of the remaining 3% believe climate change is happening, but is not significantly impacted by human behaviour. In what world does the other fraction of that 3% who believe it's a scam qualify as proof?
With more CO2 crops grow faster and use less water. The alarmists seem to want to ignore that basic fact.Said the one who thinks C02 will lead to a food shortage when over 95% of plantation grows faster from the greenhouse effect.lol
Troll. You don't have a fucking clue what you are talking about. You don't know what a peer review journal is. Your arguing for no reason about things you don't understand.BLah,...blah,...blah.. :blah:
so you can't debunk the articles showing green peace breaking the law destroying historical sites so you resort to insults
BREAKING: Greenpeace co-founder reports Greenpeace to the FBI under RICO and wire-fraud statutes
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/12...o-the-fbi-under-rico-and-wire-fraud-statutes/
Greenpeace Fined $38,000 for Breaking Election Campaign Law
https://heatst.com/world/greenpeace-fined-38000-for-breaking-election-campaign-law/
still want to defend these eco-terrorists
typical climate alarmist leftist use insult based on feelings instead of dealing with facts that don't agree with him.Sorry, but I don't arm wrestle with thalidimide babies