Integrating the absolute truth?

[|2 /-\ | /|/]

What is you method to edge closer to the absolute truth. Not in big scheme of things but in every day things. Its always best to consider 3 sides to everything yours, theirs, and the truth. However the every day truths guides you to the absolute truth.

All 3 required a systematic approach.

For the 3rd option, the absolute truth my solution is a triple integral in principle.

Set one axis as your technical/scientific acuity axis, set the other axis as spiritual axis/spiritual acuity, set the 3rd axis as your emotion/intuition acuity.

Now set your self, your belief as the 0 and set a negative extreme view in relation yours as one limit and positive extreme to your view as your other limit. Try to keep the limits in the ball park. Integrate the solution based on varying the 3 variables within your axis. Observe the solution and keep refining. If your solution diverges you are furthering your self from the truth, if it converges you are heading towards the truth. This helps refine your self and bullet proof your destiny IMO. The closer you follow the absolute truth with the 3 axis mentioned above the closer you follow your destiny.

I can expand on this as well I.e. the higher dimensions can be seen as your emotions/feelings, intuition, spirituality, free will etc...if you believe in multiple universes and believe that many forms of you exist. Your destiny is your core, and provided you follow it, you will find it in any multiple universe you become conscious in or exist in. I am going to stop right here, but before I do I believe the spirit is the energy, and we are connected to everything around us, and this helps access the other dimensions. We exist simultaneously in all.

Here is a video on how a triple integral works, you can probably make this more complex, introduce more dimensions, however I believe 3 is enough.



https://www.khanacademy.org/math/mu...s/triple-integrals-topic/v/triple-integrals-1

P.S. the ones they called prophets are not really prophets, they were regular men/women who were very good at the above. I believe it is a path as well to spiritual enlightenment and overall well being. Some of these prophets turned rouge...thus created religion IMO.
P.p.s Every person has a telepathic ability, however very few know how to tap into it. Expanding on teslas theory the whole world will eventually function as a big brain through telepathy and not the internet. Internet and technology will help us get there and evolve into a higher functioning civilization.

 

[benstt]

I integrated the sentences here and found the truth that people don't understand calculus well.

 

[|2 /-\ | /|/]

I integrated the sentences here and found the truth that people don't understand calculus well.

Really, is that all you have. Where is your substance, where is your value? Are your words empty?

First, this is not a mathematical question, it is a philosophical question, maybe beyond your comprehension ability that you refuse to answer but resort to a troll tactics.

Second, not many in here care about who is good at mathematics vs. who is not and who understands what. Really, is this all you have?

In principle integration is concerned with finding the area under a curve between two points, you also use a triple integral to find a volume. Same concept that is thought in grade 12. Nothing extra ordinary here., nothing special, simple math that majority of us had to take on here. P.S. yes majority of terb users have university degrees masters, or PhD...nothing that is not known openly.

With triple integral you can get volume. In philosophical terms you can use this principle to vary certain abilities in your mind to guess closer to the truth by having some sort of process in place. Volume = substance = truth in philosophical terms IMO

I am not interested in talking about math or technical principles. I am interested in discussing what are your options and personal opinions for determining the absolute truth. How do you know what is the truth. What process do you use to get this out? Do you believe that your mind speaks the truth? How do you know? How do you refine your philosophy?

If you can't privide any value, any substance to this discussion then why bother replying. I am not interested in comparing my dick size with you, or my degrees to see who knows what and who is better in what. What is the point? We have our jobs, we get paid, is it really worth comparing our cocks? Save it for those arrogant fucks who think they are all that in the IQ threads but fail in life and relationships and getting the good jobs. What is the point in trying g to prove this, just a waste of time and effort. What do you get out of comparing dick size? Does this make you happy or bring you content?

Give me something that is unique to you personally, give me some substance provide some value. If you
can't answer a simple question such as this, why bother replying?

 

[Polaris]

forget the exact words ... but ...

Seek truth from facts.

Practice the facts to verify truth.

The grand unity of knowledge and action.

 

[|2 /-\ | /|/]

forget the exact words ... but ...

Seek truth from facts.

Practice the facts to verify truth.

The grand unity of knowledge and action.

Thanks for your contribution...however some say...

With technical stuff facts are easy, however IMO with behavioral, spiritual and interpersonal stuff this becomes tricky and non trivial which are the actual facts.

 

[Celticman]

This would suggest there is no truth

 

[fuji]

I gather data. For a practical example, I need to make performance/compensation decisions about employees. It's hard. The people who work for me go off and do things independently. I can see the results but it's harder to get to HOW they achieved those results. Did they just get lucky? Did they coast on somebody else's good work? Did they get it done only by badgering and burning bridges with others? Or did they work hard, bring a lot to the table, and build relationships while getting it done?

I have a perspective because I see them in action in some situations, but I'm not there watching everything they do all day long.

So I gather data points by talking to those they worked with, and I try to do it in an objective way. I don't ask for opinions, I ask for examples. Tell me about the way they did XYZ when you worked together--what did you notice about how they did it, what was the result you observed?

I collect these stories over the year from as many people as possible and then see if there are patterns, did everybody notice what I noticed? Was it consistent? If there is a negative was it just a one off, maybe a bad day? Or do several people note the same kind of thing?

In this way I get multiple perspectives in as objective a way as I can, stories from several different situations and people, to hold up next to the measurable results and make a determination as to whether I have somebody who should be rewarded or put on a performance plan and terminated.

I think the approach you take will depend on the problem but in terms of truths that are hard to get at, performance management is a practical example: it's hard to do and the decisions you make really impact lives.

 

[|2 /-\ | /|/]

This would suggest there is no truth

Thank you Cman! This is exactly what I am saying. With behavior, relationship and spirituality my truth is always biased and so is yours thus it will never be the truth. However I believe that with a systematic approach we can use these biases try different scenarios, observe the outcome and see if there is a pattern of convergence vs. divergence. It will point us towards the truth if we do it enough and keep changing angels and the perspectives eventually it will point us in the right direction and there will be patterns. Based on this approach I found the meaning of life that I am happy accepting, even though it may not be the absolute truth, it is full proof when I look at it from many various angles for my own personal benefit, well being and enlightenment.

 

[|2 /-\ | /|/]

I gather data. For a practical example, I need to make performance/compensation decisions about employees. It's hard. The people who work for me go off and do things independently. I can see the results but it's harder to get to HOW they achieved those results. Did they just get lucky? Did they coast on somebody else's good work? Did they get it done only by badgering and burning bridges with others? Or did they work hard, bring a lot to the table, and build relationships while getting it done?

I have a perspective because I see them in action in some situations, but I'm not there watching everything they do all day long.

So I gather data points by talking to those they worked with, and I try to do it in an objective way. I don't ask for opinions, I ask for examples. Tell me about the way they did XYZ when you worked together--what did you notice about how they did it, what was the result you observed?

I collect these stories over the year from as many people as possible and then see if there are patterns, did everybody notice what I noticed? Was it consistent? If there is a negative was it just a one off, maybe a bad day? Or do several people note the same kind of thing?

In this way I get multiple perspectives in as objective a way as I can, stories from several different situations and people, to hold up next to the measurable results and make a determination as to whether I have somebody who should be rewarded or put on a performance plan and terminated.

I think the approach you take will depend on the problem but in terms of truths that are hard to get at, performance management is a practical example: it's hard to do and the decisions you make really impact lives.

This is a great approach and reminds me of my uncle who was a general in the war and similar stuff he would say, especially about the affecting lives part. Right now he suffers from PTSD because some of their souls hunt him, keep him up at night and the war/battle decisions he had to make becuase he was responsible for over a thousand young men, who had families, who had, children, parents etc etc etc...and how they would affect the rebuilding of a country. This is an extreme example, however based on your position you do become responsible on varying degrees, you affect their lives, their future, and if they are workable need to see how to inspire and get the best provided they are willing. These are signs of good leaders, when you manage people you are responsible, and it is your duty to constantly seek the truth in an objective way and try to inspire and get the best out of them. It is very easy to fuck people over in management, especially if you don't like them, don't agree with their religion or sex, and so many abuse this position, that it is good to see you have a positive approach.

 

[basketcase]

...

First, this is not a mathematical question, it is a philosophical question, ...

Which means people can see your post in whatever light they want. If he'd prefer to see puns as the 'truth' then it is a perfectly valid philosophical view (as is your feeling that you get to determine how people reply to your posts).

In a practical perspective though, I feel philosophy is good for debates and humour. Feel free to see things differently.

 

[|2 /-\ | /|/]

Which means people can see your post in whatever light they want. If he'd prefer to see puns as the 'truth' then it is a perfectly valid philosophical view (as is your feeling that you get to determine how people reply to your posts).

In a practical perspective though, I feel philosophy is good for debates and humour. Feel free to see things differently.

LOL!

Philosophy is open ended and limitless...some is drivel, some with little to 0 value, and some is life changing... YOU decide, just like I may decide to call a post drivel or without value based on my perception of the intentions even though you may see value in it, thus where our biased character and personality comes in.

I think its the imperfections, biases and other character traits that make us more unique more human. We can easily turn ourselves in robots by trivializing life or we can see what are the best limits and what works best based on our roles and positions in life I.e. husband, management or general etc... Sometimes guys at work are so good at one thing, really really intelligent and high IQ at just one and only one thing but their intersepronal skills suck, they can't keep a wife a GF, and have failed in life and forming bonds with other people.

This is the secret of life, how many people can genuinely say they have this in their life right now at a level they are content with...

This is bullet proof in the grand scheme of things...majority of us can't say we have this genuinely. This bulletproofs your destiny IMO