Kelly Blue Book says the slowest depreciating vehicles are:subaru wrx sti hold their value, 911 turbos on the high end of the spectrum... or bmw m3 just stay away from e46 (99-2006)
LMAO. Rover? Rover?!Best resale value is in Range Rover, anything from Subaru, and Jeep Wrangler
I will not consider Jeep Wrangler as it is extremely unsafe in crash tests.The Jeep Wrangler is the anomaly of the automotive world. Gets panned ever year by Consumer Reports yet is CONSISTENTLY in the top for resale value. If you want a sure bet on a car that will absolutely hold it's value, then that would be the one. The X6? Nobody wants them. Just my 2 cents As others have said, other very good resale value cars are honda and toyota, you pay more up front, but get more at the end. Don't discount cheap and new either, Hyundai and Kia don't have great resale values, but up front their cost is lower and if you average it over years you get great value and longer warranties, both these cars make GREAT used car purchases because they so cheap to purchase used and have a LOT of warranty left.
Yup. A couple of dozen car sites will tell you the exact same thing. This one is Forbes
Depends how you define safety. CR also hates it because it is uncomfortable to ride in and has next to no storage space, so it is very impractical.I will not consider Jeep Wrangler as it is extremely unsafe in crash tests.
Safety comes first, then resale value.
Yeah.If you spent a weekend welding wheels to a bathtub, put in a junkyard motor from the 80s, and covered it with a tarp; it would offer approximately the same features and comfort as a Jeep Wrangler.
I owned 2 jeep wranglers before, I do not know what I was thinking buying another one after my experience with the first one. But the scariest thing is that I would not be against getting another one. There is something about Jeeps wranglers that defies all logic and reason.
The only good thing I can say about them is that the engine, atleast the V6, and the manual tranny is bullet proof, but in exchange you getting the power of a v4 with the fuel economy of a v8.
I totally agree, if you do your research right, you are bound to find a good car at a good price.Why not buy a used car that is known to last a long time instead?
Depends how you define safety. CR also hates it because it is uncomfortable to ride in and has next to no storage space, so it is very impractical.
They don't make much sense in Ontario in my opinion. But in mountainous regions of BC/Alberta or Quebec where you can find yourself in unbelievably nasty weather on an unbelievably nasty and inherently dangerous twisty mountain road and there is no available cell network to call for help and you OnStar is out of signal range.... Maybe the fact that the wrangler can get you out of there alive when every other car gets stuck is a safety feature in and of itself.
Then again, a Tacoma or a 4runner would likely get you home too and unless it was a REALLY shitty drive, so would a Subaru, all of which are safer and more practical than a wrangler.
The thread topic still holds though. If you buy a 1 year old Tacoma or a 1 year old Wrangler it will lose less of its value over the next three years than most other vehicles.I totally agree, if you do your research right, you are bound to find a good car at a good price.