Canada as the world knew it

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,500
4,906
113
Canada as the world knew it


Canada will likely once again play a useful middle ground on Israel-Palestine.

21 Oct 2015 08:28 GMT
There is real hope that Canada as Canadians knew it - its values, attitudes and priorities - may return once again to the federal government's agenda, with diplomacy, accommodation, and multilateralism at the forefront.

For most, this concerns domestic policies, how the country is run, and where it is headed. Canadians can reflect that, for nine years, the outgoing Prime Minister Stephen Harper refused to attend any meeting with Canada's premiers who run the country's provincial governments. Justin Trudeau has just announced he will hold such a conclave within 100 days.

But the recent election was also about foreign policy: The 10 years of Harper's rule have changed the country's foreign policy priorities from a liberal progressive approach to a neo-conservative policy marked by distrust and confrontation.

National interests and chauvinism

Canada's quiet international exceptionalism, a country almost all had respected and valued, was twisted in the pursuit of narrow national interests and chauvinism.

The outgoing Harper was hectoring and belligerent. The country became one more player among many in that game, bereft of any larger calling - yet another trumpet of chauvinism in the global cacophony.

All this may now change.

Justin Trudeau is an open-minded man who believes Canada can once again play a constructive role internationally. We cannot predict what the new government's policy will be, but we can muse about some likely possibilities.


Canada will once again work closely with allies and like-minded countries, no longer bent on alienating in the name of assertion. The suspicion that the US voted against our candidacy for a seat at the UN Security Council will certainly not happen again.



Canada will re-embrace its most natural calling of multilateralism. Whether over climate change, a policy that the Harper government had gutted, or the work of the G20, our diplomats will provide leadership and innovation and play the facilitating role that was the country's hallmark for decades before the recent change.

Canada will no longer be persona non grata at the UN, where Harper's government was alone and unwelcome in the institution's many committees; trust will be restored in international institutions.

Superb diplomatist

In the old days, Canada was regarded as a superb diplomatist: The strong likelihood is that it will be so again. Canada's foreign service is overjoyed with the change, expecting to be able to speak truth to power - something that killed careers under the previous reign. Diplomats will have the opportunity to use their skills among the community of nations in an atmosphere of trust and confidence.



In the old days, Canada was regarded as a superb diplomatist: The strong likelihood is that it will be so again.”




On more specific issues - such as taking in refugees or the Israel-Palestine conflict - the change may not be rapid, but a slow recalibration may take place. More Syrian refugees will be accepted, and Canada once again will likely play a useful middle ground on Israel-Palestine, devoting itself to constructive answers to a suffering region rather than ideological fantasies.

In other words, Canadian policy will return to its natural position of catalyst on complex issues that require international cooperation and the light, but innovative touch of Canadian diplomacy. Equally importantly: Canada's culture of pragmatic and pluralistic politics is a natural counter to rising extremism across the globe. Positive exemplars are desperately needed.

In many ways, this is a reversion to a Canadian tradition - one bred in the Cold War. However, the increasingly dangerous geopolitics in Ukraine, the Middle East, or the South China Sea, and the increasing need for multilateral cooperation on global health, economic and environmental issues, mean that Canada's role as a diplomat and facilitator is needed more than ever.

There are countries out there, such as Brazil and India or even those in the limping EU, who may see much utility in such an actor re-engaging again, ready to lead and play an active role, rather than sit on the sidelines while global affairs deteriorate.





Trudeau's combination of idealism and realism and his pragmatic pursuit of solutions represent Canada's natural international vocation. These are necessary ingredients in an increasingly chaotic world.

Over the coming months, newly-minted Prime Minister Justin Trudeau will attend, among others, the G20, Commonwealth, and APEC summits. The world will beckon quickly; there is much work ahead.

Many will celebrate Canada's return to constructive diplomacy, led by a man whose instincts are keen, whose quest for knowledge is great, and whose entire character reeks of a commitment to working together for a better world.

Michael Bell was four-time Canadian ambassador in the Middle East. He is currently a senior fellow at the Norman Paterson School of International Affairs at Carleton University in Ottawa.

John Bell is director of the Middle East programme at the Toledo International Centre for Peace in Madrid. He is a former UN and Canadian diplomat and served as political adviser to the personal representative of the UN secretary-general for southern Lebanon and adviser to the Canadian government.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,310
4,500
113
Just looking at links via Michael Bell's wiki page. He has written in support of bombing ISIL.

And he starting working for Trudeau back in December of 2014 along with others in a group to convince voters he would be a good leader.

Considering the timing of his departure from the foreign service he may well have an axe to grind. No one likes to give up a cushy diplomatic position.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,500
4,906
113
Just looking at links via Michael Bell's wiki page. He has written in support of bombing ISIL.

And he starting working for Trudeau back in December of 2014 along with others in a group to convince voters he would be a good leader.

Considering the timing of his departure from the foreign service he may well have an axe to grind. No one likes to give up a cushy diplomatic position.
You have learned something from Aardie: attack the author, ignore the message.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,310
4,500
113
You have learned something from Aardie: attack the author, ignore the message.
I read the message. And I think it was over the top. Just because one author formerly appointed by previous Liberal gov't thinks it doesn't make it all true.

And the fact he worked on the campaign is relevent. He may personally believe it but by the same taken his own writing disagrees with a policy already implemented by Trudeau.

If he gets another position then what are we to think?
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,489
1,359
113
Just looking at links via Michael Bell's wiki page. He has written in support of bombing ISIL.

And he starting working for Trudeau back in December of 2014 along with others in a group to convince voters he would be a good leader.

Considering the timing of his departure from the foreign service he may well have an axe to grind. No one likes to give up a cushy diplomatic position.
I think after 1 year of bombing ISIS we should see that the mission is a farce. Lets not waste our time and $$ moving rocks around the desert.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
90,587
21,793
113
I think after 1 year of bombing ISIS we should see that the mission is a farce. Lets not waste our time and $$ moving rocks around the desert.
Exactly, the two Bush attacks on Iraq didn't fix the problem and using both of our jets didn't as well.
Bring them home.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,291
6,661
113
Exactly, the two Bush attacks on Iraq didn't fix the problem and using both of our jets didn't as well.
Bring them home.
And do you have a suggestion to help prevent ISIS (or Assad) from slaughtering innocents or are you simply feeling that Canada should just let people in other countries slaughter each other?
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Canada was largely irrelevant on the world stage, I don't see that changing.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,489
1,359
113
And do you have a suggestion to help prevent ISIS (or Assad) from slaughtering innocents or are you simply feeling that Canada should just let people in other countries slaughter each other?
You see to defend Israel slaughtering innocents, why are you so broken up when Assad or Isis does it?
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,291
6,661
113
You see to defend Israel slaughtering innocents, why are you so broken up when Assad or Isis does it?
I would guess your desire to avoid discussing solutions means you don't give a shit about Arabs slaughtering each other.
 
Toronto Escorts