Harper Regime getting desperate

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,091
2,639
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/conservative-advertising-chinese-punjabi-1.3268011


Conservative Party advertising targeted at Chinese and Punjabi-speaking voters in Vancouver and Toronto is raising concerns in the Liberal Party.

The advertisement characterises Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau as supporting the sale of marijuana to children, and the establishment of safe-injection sites and neighbourhood brothels.

"It's absolutely not true," said Harjit Sajjan, the Liberal candidate for Vancouver South.

"I find it very disturbing that the Conservatives would actually turn to a tactic that goes beyond their fear and divisive tactics."

The campaign is running in Chinese and Punjabi-language newspapers and radio stations in Richmond and South Vancouver, as well as the Richmond Hill and Markham areas of Toronto — ridings with a large percentage of Chinese and Punjabi-speaking residents.

They also happen to be former Liberal ridings that are now battlegrounds for Conservative seats.

Sajjan said it's clear the Conservatives are targeting the ridings with specific messaging for voters in the Chinese and Punjabi communities.

"They shouldn't be targeting these ads to anybody," he said.

A spokesperson for Stephen Harper said the Conservative Party doesn't comment on its advertising strategies, but the Conservative Leader defended the campaign.

"Justin [Trudeau] refuses to acknowledge the damage that drugs do to families and communities," said Stephen Harper in a written statement sent from his office.

"He wants to allow the sale of marijuana in corner stores and increase the number of heroin injection sites, dangerously misguided policies that would only make drugs more accessible to our children."

Checking the facts

Sajjan said he supports Vancouver's supervised injection site, Insite, but that doesn't mean those types of services would start popping up in neighbourhoods.

Trudeau has also spoken out in support of supervised injection sites in the past; he backed Montreal Mayor Denis Coderre's call to open four of them in the Quebec city.

The Conservative Party, on the other hand, has repeatedly tried to shut down Insite, despite a Supreme Court ruling that closing it down would be a violation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Similarly, the Party's tough-on-drugs approach has seen Harper speak out against easing marijuana laws on several occasions, even though the majority of Canadians say they would support such measures.

The Liberals have stated that, if elected, they intend to legalize marijuana for people over the age of 18. The NDP similarly said they would ease laws around the drug, although the party said it would favour decriminalization rather than legalization.

As for the advertisement's claim about brothels, in a written statement the Conservative Party pointed out that Trudeau voted against Bill C-36, an anti-prostitution bill which had to be amended in response to the Supreme Court of Canada ruling that it was unconstitutional.
 

twizz

Banned
Mar 8, 2014
1,974
0
0
Canada-man, the views that you hold are very similar to those that The Cons and their base share with regards to Islamaphobia, Marijuana, and Anti-feminism. You are supporting the wrong party.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,091
2,639
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Canada-man, the views that you hold are very similar to those that The Cons and their base share with regards to Islamaphobia, Marijuana, and Anti-feminism. You are supporting the wrong party.

i am on the left on economic issues.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,622
3,191
113
i am on the left on economic issues.
I could almost understand lefties who are passionate about their social causes to the point of placing a higher value on these causes relative to economic issues
That is the wrong priority as one can only address social issues with a strong economy.

However to be on the left on economic issues is pretty much stating you do not fully understand economics and more specifically what drives an economy
 

Moviefan-2

Court Jester
Oct 17, 2011
10,489
172
63
Brothels might be a good idea if we didn't live in an age of iPhones and Google Street View.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Lefties cherish their freedom more than money
How about the freedom to opt out of a union at your workplace, do lefties cherish that?

Or the freedom to charge whatever rent you like on the investment property you put your life savings into?

Or the freedom to engage in trade with people in other countries?

Are all those freedoms cherished by lefties?
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
How about the freedom to opt out of a union at your workplace, do lefties cherish that?

Or the freedom to charge whatever rent you like on the investment property you put your life savings into?

Or the freedom to engage in trade with people in other countries?

Are all those freedoms cherished by lefties?
Once we can agree,...but you forgot,...freedom from having a mob tell a business owner what he will pay the mob,...and who does what, and how, in your business,...and the list goes on.

FAST
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,091
2,639
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
I could almost understand lefties who are passionate about their social causes to the point of placing a higher value on these causes relative to economic issues
That is the wrong priority as one can only address social issues with a strong economy.

However to be on the left on economic issues is pretty much stating you do not fully understand economics and more specifically what drives an economy
supply and demand is what drives the economy. not right wing tax cutting policies
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
supply and demand is what drives the economy. not right wing tax cutting policies
"DEMAND",...is meaningless if there is no money in the hands of consumers because of high taxes,...simple economics.

"SUPPLY",...is meaningless if there is no money in the hands of consumers because of high taxes,...simple economics.

The better the economic environment that a government can create for CAPITALISM to flourish,...is what "DRIVES" the economy.

FAST
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
Lefties cherish their freedom more than money, I'm assuming you would feel happy to live in rich middle age gulf countries, you can even make more money there than here in Canada
Lefties cherish their freedom,...a contradiction in terms,...don't ya think,...???

more than money,...then they should disallow unions,...!!!

FAST
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,880
22,924
113

rhuarc29

Well-known member
Apr 15, 2009
9,650
1,312
113
I'm the opposite, I'm on the left on social issues but on the right on the economic issues....
Same, but I can't vote for the NDP because they're way too far to the left on economy for me to bear. And I'm not sure I'd characterize them as being more socially leftist than the Liberals anyway. Unless I change my mind, I won't be voting for any of the three major parties...but I'll be cheering on the Liberals.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,622
3,191
113
I'm the opposite, I'm on the left on social issues but on the right on the economic issues, but economy isn't a factor when it comes to voting, my personal freedoms are more important than money.
NDP is the most socially progressive party among the three major parties ( Greens also but it's a tiny party), that's why I voted for them
Of coarse the NDP are the most socialists
They want social utopia , however they do not have a clue how to pay for it other than expecting someone else to

Hopefully you will feel the cold hard slap of reality if you try and reconcile the burden of social utopia on an economy.
If you do not try and reconcile that burden, then you are fooling your self
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,622
3,191
113
supply and demand is what drives the economy. not right wing tax cutting policies
Government driven demand as Justin wants to implement is not sustainable
He will borrow billions finding out

Cutting taxes most definatly boosts demand & puts money into the economy in a far more efficient way

Answer me this smart guy

Governments at all levels scrape off close to 50% of Canadians income (Income taxes, GST property taxes etc)
Yet the government generates only 33% of GDP

So where does the other 17% go ?
Note: That does not take into account the Billions collected in corporate taxes

Into that ever expanding sink hole call government inefficiency ???
Then increasing the size of government just increases the absolute size of the waste/ burden

This is a concept the NDP does not understand and the Liberals avoid out of self preservation
 

RandyAndy2

Active member
Jul 12, 2003
1,150
0
36
Cutting taxes most definatly boosts demand & puts money into the economy in a far more efficient way
I'd suggest that a more accurate statement would be, "Cutting taxes generally boosts demand..." I believe that it depends to a significant extent who receives the tax cuts. If the tax cuts go to the poor and middle class, as compared with the wealthy, it makes sense that a greater proportion of that money will be spent, boosting demand. It also makes sense that, of the spent money, a greater proportion would be spent on locally produced and supplied goods and services. Therefore, if your intent is to boost demand which would employ Canadians, it would seem that you should support cutting taxes for the poor and middle class, as opposed to cutting taxes for the wealthy as the Conservatives advocate.
 
Toronto Escorts