9/11 Fourteen Years Later

[TESLAMotors]

That video is an absolute FRAUD. It picks an angle where the only the top of the WTC is visible, obscuring the impact site and below, which would reveal it to be collapsing from that point, rather than from the ground. Go look at any video on YouTube where the bottom half of the building isn't concealed behind another building and you will see it does not collapse at all like that -- it falls from the middle, not the bottom as in a controlled demolition. Which means the "experts" who created that video are just lying frauds.

You already know this from the thread above, which means you aren't just posting this in ignorance anymore.

You are a lying fraud too.

Umm, you DO see the title of this video correct? LOL
BUILDING 7 I'm not talking about towers 1 or 2.

How is this a fraud?
Or are you intentionally trying to make it seem like I'm talking about towers 1 and 2 when the video is clearly titled WTC 7.

It's a comparison of WTC 7 to a controlled demolition.

Fuji, let me ask you as well, since GPIDEAL and Basketcase are obviously quiet on this as well.

Do the buildings in the video below look similar in how they collapse?
Again, this is BUILDING 7
Yes or no?

 

[Titalian]

3:20 here clearly shows collapse from the impact site:

https://youtu.be/ecv0p8JWsqU

Tesla lied.

As for wtc7 his own video is full of quotes of people warning the building is about to collapse before it did. Were they all in on the conspiracy???

Hilarios, he shot his own foot.

Well they must have been this character (Zionist) who was talking to the fire commander. LOL

 

[TESLAMotors]

Well they must have been if this character (Zionist) was talking to the fire commander. LOL

1:48 in this video answers to Larry Silverstein saying "pull it" to a fireman.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQrpLp-X0ws
According to this 32 year veteran firefighter (and a trained fire marshal - a forensic detective, he has the power to issue a subpoena)
.....there is no term of "'pulling buildings', "we've never done that, we don't do that, I don't know where he pulled that out of...it's just not part of our operations"

 

[twizz]

 

[twizz]

 

[twizz]

 

[fuji]

1:48 in this video answers to Larry Silverstein saying "pull it" to a fireman.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQrpLp-X0ws
According to this 32 year veteran firefighter (and a trained fire marshal - a forensic detective, he has the power to issue a subpoena)
.....there is no term of "'pulling buildings', "we've never done that, we don't do that, I don't know where he pulled that out of...it's just not part of our operations"

It means get out. We hear lots of people warning that the building is about to collapse in your own video.

Stop grasping at straws, it's pathetic.

 

[TESLAMotors]

Umm, you DO see the title of this video correct? LOL
BUILDING 7 I'm not talking about towers 1 or 2.

How is this a fraud?
Or are you intentionally trying to make it seem like I'm talking about towers 1 and 2 when the video is clearly titled WTC 7.

It's a comparison of WTC 7 to a controlled demolition.

Fuji, let me ask you as well, since GPIDEAL and Basketcase are obviously quiet on this as well.

Do the buildings in the video below look similar in how they collapse?
Again, this is BUILDING 7
Yes or no?

GPIDEAL, basketcase, third opportunity for you guys here, it's just YES or NO question.
Do the buildings above look similar in how they fall?

Come on Fuji, you always have something to say.
(for the record Fuji, one is WTC 7 the other is a controlled demolition, no trickery here my friend)

 

[fuji]

GPIDEAL, basketcase, third opportunity for you guys here, it's just YES or NO question.
Do the buildings above look similar in how they fall?

Come on Fuji, you always have something to say.
(for the record Fuji, one is WTC 7 the other is a controlled demolition, no trickery here my friend)

Have you abandoned your claim that the twin towers were blown up?

You know, the topic of the thread?

 

[TESLAMotors]

Have you abandoned your claim that the twin towers were blown up?

You know, the topic of the thread?

Have you changed your stance on the pushing theory not bring the cause as per NIST's new theory years later (which seems you haven't been keeping up to date with).


So, what are your thoughts on the two buildings above, do they look familiar in how they fall?

 

[Titalian]

GPIDEAL, basketcase, third opportunity for you guys here, it's just YES or NO question.
Do the buildings above look similar in how they fall?

Come on Fuji, you always have something to say.
(for the record Fuji, one is WTC 7 the other is a controlled demolition, no trickery here my friend)

I think GB has abandoned us LOL

 

[fuji]

Have you changed your stance on the pushing theory not bring the cause as per NIST's new theory years later (which seems you haven't been keeping up to date with).


So, what are your thoughts on the two buildings above, do they look familiar in how they fall?

I have no interest in this topic other than refuting your kook crazy conspiracy theory. That was done pages and weeks ago when it was shown that they collapsed from the impact site.

As for WTC7 its collapse was widely predicted before it went down, and well understood.

So, no conspiracy theory.

 

[Titalian]

I have no interest in this topic other than refuting your kook crazy conspiracy theory. That was done pages and weeks ago when it was shown that they collapsed from the impact site.

As for WTC7 its collapse was widely predicted before it went down, and well understood.

So, no conspiracy theory.

Well this is the statement of this thread, LOL Predictable? Well Understood? Why don't you enlighten us genius and Btw this was not your sentiment at the beginning of this thread.
Why don't you just state that you don't know. Just like the JFK assassination. Instead of always wanting to right with no real constructive input.

 

[GPIDEAL]

Obviously you haven't watched or listened to the narrator. That's fine.

I haven't had time to watch the entire video but the narrator is just a reporter. (I will watch it later on personal time).

Interestingly enough, he SAYS that other buildings are on fire and maybe on verge of collapse.

 

[GPIDEAL]

As you with the JFK conspiracy, I've read many documents and watched many videos. Only difference being the JFK conspiracy is more than 1/2 century old where as this disaster is relatively recent
in comparison. People for the most part, are still trying to come to grips with the tragedy itself. This is a presentation from Dr. Judy Woods, its long but she does delve into details. It is very compelling.

JFK conspiracy is WAY different.

There have been several investigations and enquiries since the Warren Commission, and declassified documents via the JFK Act which have bolstered the research community's claims of conspiracy.

The Zapruder film shows evidence of a shot from the front (and per recent research, another shot from behind).

We can actually see the conspirators on 9/11 videos - OBL with Al Qaeda and its operatives.

Belief in one conspiracy doesn't mean that all other historical events are conspiracies.

 

[GPIDEAL]

It was a simple question, do the buildings in the video above look similar or not in how they fall?

Why the ramble about it? Visually, pretty close or different?

Pardon me TESLA, but it's you who is rambling on.

Your repeated question was asked and answered in my posts of #516 and #523, which you apparently have refused to read or digest or acknowledge.

All controlled-demolition videos show flashes of explosions when the charges are set off sequentially to bring down a structure.

You have conveniently left this out in the video clips on the right side of your video.

There were no flashes or multiple explosions in the collapse of Building 7. Nada. None.

 

[GPIDEAL]

Umm, you DO see the title of this video correct? LOL
BUILDING 7 I'm not talking about towers 1 or 2.

How is this a fraud?
Or are you intentionally trying to make it seem like I'm talking about towers 1 and 2 when the video is clearly titled WTC 7.

It's a comparison of WTC 7 to a controlled demolition.

Fuji, let me ask you as well, since GPIDEAL and Basketcase are obviously quiet on this as well.

Do the buildings in the video below look similar in how they collapse?
Again, this is BUILDING 7
Yes or no?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7Rm6ZFROmc

I've replied to this before, and no, I'm not quiet. Can't always spend my time on Terb as my post count might otherwise suggest lol.

Frankly TESLA, I spent part of Tuesday night watching two DVDs of a JFK Lancer Assassination Conference I missed one year, that included speakers such as James DiEugenio, Bill Simpich and ex-law enforcement officer Brian Edwards (more interesting than regular TV).

Fascinating stuff that included analysis of declassified Executive Sessions of the Warren Commission which proves even more that it was a whitewash.

If you have more convincing evidence for the 9/11 hypothesis of controlled-demolitions, I might bite, but not so far.

BTW, here's a video of a collapse without explosives. Now in this case, they used power equipment to weaken the top part of a building. In WTC 7, it was weakened by heavy pieces that fell from the North Tower (check out the video analysis on the Debunking911 webpage link I provided). Once a building is weakened, it can collapse, and the fires exacerbated the problem. (Interestingly enough, the top part of this building in the video below crashed down on the majority of the building's bottom part).

 

[fuji]

Well this is the statement of this thread, LOL Predictable? Well Understood? Why don't you enlighten us genius and Btw this was not your sentiment at the beginning of this thread.
Why don't you just state that you don't know. Just like the JFK assassination. Instead of always wanting to right with no real constructive input.

Here is the statement of the thread:

The twin towers failed from the point of impact contradicting your conspiracy theory. WTC7 was widely expected to collapse before it did by many on the scene, it was no surprise.

That ended the conspiracy theory, we KNOW your conspiracy theory is false, it has been proved false. Since then you have been rambling about rambling.

 

[GPIDEAL]

Here is the statement of the thread:

The twin towers failed from the point of impact contradicting your conspiracy theory. WTC7 was widely expected to collapse before it did by many on the scene, it was no surprise.

That ended the conspiracy theory, we KNOW your conspiracy theory is false, it has been proved false. Since then you have been rambling about rambling.

Yes, it was enlightening to hear fire fighters who knew the building was going to collapse from the raging fires and damage from flying building pieces that made holes in the building. I didn't know about the visible bulge on the side of the building as quoted by firefighters on the scene. They knew it was unsafe to enter and put out, based on prior experience.

 

[Titalian]

Here is the statement of the thread:

The twin towers failed from the point of impact contradicting your conspiracy theory. WTC7 was widely expected to collapse before it did by many on the scene, it was no surprise.

That ended the conspiracy theory, we KNOW your conspiracy theory is false, it has been proved false. Since then you have been rambling about rambling.

It ain't over till the fat lady sings. My little Fugi.