Should the First Mars Mission Be All Women?

[|2 /-\ | /|/]

Based on scientific evidence, and various studies it appears that it is more efficient to send women to Mars.

It's inevitable, and we all know that women are more important in a society, just a fact. Men are just dispensable, maybe why a lot of religions fear and want to repress women, because they know and do not want to lose power.

In simple terms women are more efficient...smart guys know this and use it to their advantage.

 

[Chloë.]

Not ALL women but majority I agree with from a reproductive standpoint, unless we are talking about IVF techniques. But then again, having some Y chromosomes around to start definitely has its perks. :eyebrows:

 

[basketcase]

A whole bunch of women essentially locked in a capsule? Well it works on reality TV so why not?

 

[fuji]

 

[onthebottom]

That would bring new meaning to the term hell week.....

I'd assume that those going to Mars would be STEM grads, slim pickings there among the fairer gender....

 

[oil&gas]

Only if NASA wants to avoid the complications of male
astronauts having sex in zero-gravity. Lesbian sex because
there is no ejaculation of semen is not as messy and more
manageable on a space mission.

 

[red]

A program to send ex wifes to mars?


Sounds good to me. I will sign her up today!

 

[james t kirk]

Ask any woman and they will usually tell you that they prefer to work with men.

A spaceship full of women? Aside from the lesbian fantasy thing, I can't imagine it going well. Women have a very hard time working with a person (of either gender) that they don't like. They will hold a grudge for 30 years over nothing. Men typically can work with a guy they don't like provided that guy knows what he's doing. Women just can't do it no matter what.

 

[red]

Ask any woman and they will usually tell you that they prefer to work with men.

A spaceship full of women? Aside from the lesbian fantasy thing, I can't imagine it going well. Women have a very hard time working with a person (of either gender) that they don't like. They will hold a grudge for 30 years over nothing. Men typically can work with a guy they don't like provided that guy knows what he's doing. Women just can't do it no matter what.

Thats very true. Its incredible how they can stay mad at some woman for some imagined slight- while men can call each other assholes and maybe even come to blows and then be friends again

 

[TESLAMotors]

Ask any woman and they will usually tell you that they prefer to work with men.

A spaceship full of women? Aside from the lesbian fantasy thing, I can't imagine it going well. Women have a very hard time working with a person (of either gender) that they don't like. They will hold a grudge for 30 years over nothing. Men typically can work with a guy they don't like provided that guy knows what he's doing. Women just can't do it no matter what.

This is absolutely true.

 

[|2 /-\ | /|/]

Thats very true. Its incredible how they can stay mad at some woman for some imagined slight- while men can call each other assholes and maybe even come to blows and then be friends again

Ohh gawd, don't get me even started on this one...lol...don't they know we make mistakes...come on now its been years and you think they would forgive us...geeze...

I had fist fights with my friends in the past and the next day we'd be blazing together. I think my short term memory is to blame here, maybe too much spliff back in the day. Its hard for me to stay mad a people for longer then a few days, its just not worth it, plus I'm too busy thinking about all the ladies mad at me :fear:

But on a serious note I am surprised that they are more efficient at calories burned compared to the men. So what we do with all this wasted energy then maybe it ends up in the same black hole our short term memory goes.

 

[Smallcock]

Why?

 

[|2 /-\ | /|/]

Why?

It is cheaper like .5 of a billion to couple of billion because they burn 50% less calories vs. men for same taks and price is due to fuel costs and to sustain. Also their vision does not get fucked up. Some guys experience permanent vision loss/damage in space, maybe too much jerking off they go blind.

 

[IM469]

It is cheaper like .5 of a billion to couple of billion because they burn 50% less calories vs. men for same taks and price is due to fuel costs and to sustain. Also their vision does not get fucked up. Some guys experience permanent vision loss/damage in space, maybe too much jerking off they go blind.

I'll bet the study was conducted by a feminist lesbian hoping to get a trapped bevy of beautiful women all to herself. Besides the study was probably performed on single women but once you get them into a long term commitment of any type (including a Mars trip) - even if physical assets were part of the criteria of selection - very early after the start of that long term commitment they will start porking up those food rations and growing that fat ass until the food stores are gone and the retro rockets are no longer able to stop them from crashing.

Not to mention the trip could be jeopardized by a stray mouse or spider in the spaceship. Or what happens if the Mars rover gets a flat tire ?? It is a documented fact that women have different brain wiring that makes map reading extremely problematic. There is a significant chance that without a man being involved they may end up on the wrong planet !

In my female crew, I would also get rid of petty arguments over clothing issues by dressing them in the same uniform:

 

[punter]

No, the first Venus mission should be all women because Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus.

 

[GPIDEAL]

It is cheaper like .5 of a billion to couple of billion because they burn 50% less calories vs. men for same taks and price is due to fuel costs and to sustain. Also their vision does not get fucked up. Some guys experience permanent vision loss/damage in space, maybe too much jerking off they go blind.

This is why it should be co-ed.

 

[|2 /-\ | /|/]

Good god, not another one..get a grip on yourself brother, you are loosing it. This is what they want us to think, damsel in distress, can't do this, need our help for that..wake up and smell her kush, this is part of a greater conspiracy making us believe that they are helpless without us..but once we drop our guard and when we least expect it, bam, straight for the throats... and our wallets...

Geezers louisers, always assume they are smarter, whittier and more resourceful.

I'll bet the study was conducted by a feminist lesbian hoping to get a trapped bevy of beautiful women all to herself. Besides the study was probably performed on single women but once you get them into a long term commitment of any type (including a Mars trip) - even if physical assets were part of the criteria of selection - very early after the start of that long term commitment they will start porking up those food rations and growing that fat ass until the food stores are gone and the retro rockets are no longer able to stop them from crashing.

Not to mention the trip could be jeopardized by a stray mouse or spider in the spaceship. Or what happens if the Mars rover gets a flat tire ?? It is a documented fact that women have different brain wiring that makes map reading extremely problematic. There is a significant chance that without a man being involved they may end up on the wrong planet !

In my female crew, I would also get rid of petty arguments over clothing issues by dressing them in the same uniform:

 

[canada-man]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/a...en-says-scientist-Professor-Richard-Lynn.html