Yes, the debris seems to have targeted only WTC 7, the US Postal building and Verizon were unscathed and still standing, UNFUCKING BELIEVABLE, SERIOUSLY.
Is not not factual?
2 planes, 3 buildings.
All 3 buildings fell straight down.
Which part is untrue?
Btw, you never did address this reply with the debris.
Talk about an imagination, stuff like this is inspiring that anything is possible.
"The WTC 5 got a few lumps of debris, the US Postal building looks pretty damn good to me and VERIZON which is right next door to WTC 7 looks unscathed as well. AMAZING!
Looks to me like the debris and fires were pretty selective in how and where they fell."
The core and the rest of the building didn't get pulverized into dust. There were large pieces of debris. You are just babbling nonsense now.
You mean besides the perfect symmetry part you omitted from this post?
You're right. It wasn't a Lego block. That's a great analogy.
Newton's 3rd does not apply to that context because as I've already said, the building was not made of solid blocks but rather a frame of individually connected members. As the failure occurred each member became an independent element, not part of a whole.
If the debris had hit Verizon instead you would now be telling us that it was pretty selective in taking out Verizon. If it had hit the postal building, that would be your conspiracy.Is not not factual?
2 planes, 3 buildings.
All 3 buildings fell straight down.
Which part is untrue?
Btw, you never did address this reply with the debris.
Talk about an imagination, stuff like this is inspiring that anything is possible.
"The WTC 5 got a few lumps of debris, the US Postal building looks pretty damn good to me and VERIZON which is right next door to WTC 7 looks unscathed as well. AMAZING!
Looks to me like the debris and fires were pretty selective in how and where they fell."
Remote control debris. Who knew that the military had that kind of technology. Then again, if they have invisible explosives that they attached to the exterior structure then why couldn't they have remote control debris?Yes, the debris seems to have targeted only WTC 7, the US Postal building and Verizon were unscathed and still standing, UNFUCKING BELIEVABLE, SERIOUSLY.
In fact, parts of WTC 6 look a LOT better off than WTC 7 did in the aftermath, I mean, it's still standing. LOL
Thanks for mentioning the debris.
No it's at freefall +30%. NIST initially said freefall, but changed their story (either because they knew they'd be called on this or they actually were called on it), either way, if NIST made a mistake in their initial findings and these guys are supposed to know physics, imagine what else they could have fucked up? lol
Says you? Mr. Physics?
DUDE 110 STORY building in less than 10 seconds, with what seems to be NO RESISTANCE.
The falling debris created an enormous amount of heat along with the kinetic impact. The potential gravitational energy turned into heat as the falling objects impacted.
As I said, the buildings weren't blocks but a bunch of individual members. I remember in university when we used finite element software, the calculations involved in the software were so intense that all the other computer labs had to be shut down so the servers had the computing capacity available.
Is not not factual?
The cross members were only attached at their ends by simple bolts. They would have provided very little resistance to a couple dozen stories collapsing on them.
So the building fell faster than gravity? I guess that makes sense because your remote control debris must have had some kind of propulsion to make it hit where the government wanted it to.
So not only do you make up theories of remote control debris; not only do you ignore actual facts and inconvenient questions; not only do you change the topic when your claims are destroyed but now you repeat questions that have already been answered.
I did (or at least the way you are trying to warp it) but you conveniently dismissed that response too.
I meant to say 30% slower than freefall.
