IMHO this is correct. I recall having an accident during the day, and the insurance company asked if I was on business. Of course I said no, because I don't have that coverage.What private insurance?? Your auto policy isn't going to cover you in a car that you're not insuring! The Uber driver's policy isn't going to cover you because it's not a commercial policy and he's using it for business! You want to be the guy testing this case in court while it drags on for years? Who's going to pay for your rehab and pain meds in the meantime? Guess how many sessions of physiotherapy OHIP covers? ZERO!
Here's a law firm's take on insurance.What private insurance?? Your auto policy isn't going to cover you in a car that you're not insuring! The Uber driver's policy isn't going to cover you because it's not a commercial policy and he's using it for business! You want to be the guy testing this case in court while it drags on for years? Who's going to pay for your rehab and pain meds in the meantime? Guess how many sessions of physiotherapy OHIP covers? ZERO!
UBER INSURANCE
Actually, from what I see, the current state of things is good for the individual driver.
Not only does he or she have personal insurance, but is also covered by Uber insurance.
Uber also has uninsured motorist coverage for the cars being used for business purposes.
The passenger is protected on all angles by Uber insurance. They are more protected than the drivers, in my opinion.
Uber has a $1 million liability and $1 million underinsured/uninsured motorist policy for the passengers.
So, the passenger is protected up to $1 million dollars, and possibly $2 million depending upon where the fault lies for the accident.
http://www.lhllaw.com/whos-covered-concerns-uber-insurance-seem-unfounded/
I thought you said their insurance policy was a trade secret?Here's a law firm's take on insurance.
I think your information is based on the US. Here is a piece I found on Canada.Here's a law firm's take on insurance.
I see an opportunity here for insurance companies.I think your information is based on the US. Here is a piece I found on Canada.
http://www.kennedyinsurance.ca/uber-drivers-passengers-face-serious-legal-insurance-consequences/
The biggest risk for drivers is that your auto insurance does not cover using your vehicle to carry passengers. This means that if you get in an accident while transporting a passenger, you could face serious liability and vehicle replacement costs. If you want to be an Uber driver, you have to add the Permission to Carry Paying Passengers endorsement to your insurance, and this can be costly.
Additionally, if you are using the vehicle to carry paying passengers, and don’t have the requisite municipal license, the endorsement will not be enough to get you out of hot water with the law as you are operating as a taxi in contravention of local bylaws. Cities such as Ottawa and Toronto are cracking down on Uber drivers, in some cases having bylaw officers book rides on the app and hand out fines to drivers who don’t have taxi licenses.
The worst case scenario for an Uber driver is that the vehicle policy is invalidated by undisclosed use to carry passengers, leaving you without auto insurance, making you liable for any legal or medical costs and making it harder – and more expensive – for you to get auto insurance in the future.
If you do choose to register your vehicle as a taxi, it must be properly licensed and insured commercially as a taxi – the Permission to Carry Paying Passengers endorsement is not enough.
I am sure they do and it makes sense. Some cab companies have apps as well but probably too late to the party- kind of like yellow pagesBTW, I'm told a great many cabbies use Uber now to find fares
The drivers speak English and likely smell better!The taxi industry should concentrate on providing better service at competitive rates. People Uber because it's better, cheaper and the cars are cleaner and in better mechanical condition. It's not rocket science!
Yes you are right Uber has contacted Intact insurance and is working to get a policy that can work for all it's drivers. But what I understand from Uber is that they really don't care about laws and if they are asked to follow the laws or leave the city they are in they will end up leaving like it has happened in a few cities around the world. It's a good thing they have paid off some politicians and they have them on their side.I believe Uber is currently looking into a blanket insurance policy for all its Canadian drivers, similar to what it has in the States. Frankly, I think it's deplorable that they are operating before that's in place, and therefore transferring all the responsibility to the drivers who sign up on their site that says their covered.
The only thing uber does not pay for is a taxi license (not a taxi service) and union dues (not a taxi union)None of what you said addresses anything I mentioned regarding the cost of driving a cab. What you mentioned is service, which I already agreed with. There are many costs associated with driving a cab. Few, if any, of which Uber pays.
The public can, has, and will 'speak with their wallets', but evening the initial playing field would be required. If what you favor is best, then you're arguing that the all governmental bodies end issuing all permits and licenses so that the public-can-speak with their wallets.