That does not matter, all they do is look at the drivers abstract and see the conviction. Anything else is beside the point. You really think the insurance salesman is Sherlock Holmes and is gonna conduct an investigation with precise timelines? In either case allowing your insurance to lapse through non-payment I think is considered insurance fraud so they are gonna ass rape you in facility anyhoo.Ok here is the rationale nottyboi.
1. Failing to provide proof of insurance WILL raise the issue.
2. During the application process, he will disclose the ticket (or they will discover it on his abstract) and then they will refer to his insurance history and see that he was driving without insurance.
But if you think licking the ass of the Crown is going to do anything except save him a few hundred dollars... than he can take your off the cuff advice and ignore mine.
That does not matter, all they do is look at the drivers abstract and see the conviction. Anything else is beside the point. You really think the insurance salesman is Sherlock Holmes and is gonna conduct an investigation with precise timelines?
Fuck me, I forgot about facility insurance.Don't do ^this^.
The fine is the least of his worries. ANY conviction relating to insurance is an excuse for the insurers to kick him into Facility for >$6k per year!
Fight for NO conviction. You CANNOT do this by yourself and the consequences are real and tangible. Far more expensive than a lawyer.
Sometimes it is better to say nothing and let people think you are stupid than say more and remove all doubt!
And yes, insurance underwriters (not salesmen) do check insured timelines and claims history, driving recordetc. Two question they always ask is "How long have you had continuos insurance coverage" and "have you ever had a policy cancelled for any reason".
As they should. I know one case that ended up costing the person $8000. She got in an accident while uninsured so her case is obviously more serious.That's because the fine for a first conviction is $5,000 + 25% surcharge = $6,250
The courts take driving without insurance very seriously.
He'd be someone's butler for the rest of his lifeWhat if he hit someone just walking along the street ???
Way to be non judgmental...lolWhat do you think would have happened if you were involved in an accident causing the death of the sole provider of another family?
Why??? he came right out and admitted he fucked up. Do you get off on kicking a guy while he's down? He knows he fucked up, admitted it and wants to move on with some advice. Your response contributes absolutely nothing positive.While I appreciate your desire not to be judged, it is ludicrous to ask us not to judge you. You will get more help and sympathy if your stop making excuses for your unacceptable and illegal behavior.
At least you should show some remorse and then maybe people will help you figure out the best way to deal with the situation you are in.
You showed a real lack of concern for others and prioritized your own selfish interests over the lives is other people. Expect to be judged for that.
Getting judged for your actions is part of life. We even pay people to judge, and give them special respect. You post in a public forum, you get what you get.Why??? he came right out and admitted he fucked up. Do you get off on kicking a guy while he's down? He knows he fucked up, admitted it and wants to move on with some advice. Your response contributes absolutely nothing positive.
Getting judged for your actions is part of life. You post in a public forum, you get what you get.
'Fucked up' is how you describe spilling your coffee, not how you consciously decided to unlawfully drive a multi-tonne vehicle at speed where the danger to yourself and others is extreme.
What on earth are you getting at? You seem to making some kind of link between not having insurance and killing people, but the problem with killing people is BAD DRIVING, not being uninsured.Would you still feel that way accepting the quick payout for your dead child?
I tried to make the same point in my previous post. This confirms I'm not the only one trying to understand what his point is.What on earth are you getting at? You seem to making some kind of link between not having insurance and killing people, but the problem with killing people is BAD DRIVING, not being uninsured.
If my child was killed by an idiotic driver, I would be mad at his DRIVING, not his INSURED STATUS.