And you have repeatedly blamed Jews for being the victims of Palestinian terrorism. You have repeatedly acted as if Palestinians were incapable of moral actions.Nope I have always said engaging in war is always criminal. ...
Just like with your views on Assad you just prove yourself an idiot again.As for storing weapons in civilian areas, this has been standard Israeli practice for a long time it seems:
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Ne...0#.VM2xAy5lZ-A
You have posted all kinds of things that try to equate Israel's legitimate and moral right to defend itself with the actions of terrorists who are driven by their pathological hatred of Jews. That makes you the head cheerleader for Jew-hating terrorists.I am living with a Jew right now, he is a pretty cool dude. I don't think I would live with a Jew if I hated them.
I don't believe that, at the very best the IDF shows reckless disregard for Arab civilians and that is quite a broadly held opinon. So many times Israel escapes UN condemnation ONLY because of the US (Daddy) Veto.They do not behave in similar fashion. Not even close. Hezbollah and Hamas intentionally target civilians as their primary objective. IDF does not.
For any moral person that ends the debate. There is no moral equivalence at all, IDF is infinitely superior to terrorists like Hamas and Hezbollah on any moral or ethical index.
You have posted all kinds of things that try to equate Israel's legitimate and moral right to defend itself with the actions of terrorists who are driven by their pathological hatred of Jews. That makes you the head cheerleader for Jew-hating terrorists.
If it helps you sleep any better, I don't actually think you hate Jews. I think you just don't know what you're talking about.
The problem is this: Ignorance is no excuse.
http://news.nationalpost.com/2015/01/30/charles-krauthammer-european-jew-hatred-is-back/
Initiating it is rarely so, defensively yes. But I suppose chumps like you would say the Afghan and Iraqi wars were just and proper. If the end of WWi had been handled better, there would have been no WWII. Just as if Israel were to make a proper and just offer to the Palis it could result in a durable peace.Except it isn't. War is frequently legal, and often just.
Those armories are in civilian areas, it would justify wiping out the whole block which is what Israel does.And you have repeatedly blamed Jews for being the victims of Palestinian terrorism. You have repeatedly acted as if Palestinians were incapable of moral actions.
Just like with your views on Assad you just prove yourself an idiot again.
The first line of the article. "Hundreds of guns held in armories". Not in their homes.
Considering Syria ended the Lebanese civil war, yes absolutely it was justified. Once that ended Lebanon was a much better place. Lebanon was a failed state at the time Syria invaded. And frankly, when the Syrians left and returned Lebanon to independence, Israel pummeled it back about 30years in time killing over 1200 people and injuring over 5000 plus the massive damage to important civilian infrastructure like airports and electrical grid. So as horrible as Assad is, the Israelis were even worse to the Lebanese. Would you rather be repressed or bombed?Hezbollah instigating wars with Israel sure doesn't provide stability to Lebanon. And Syria occupying Lebanon for decades in your mind was justified and you think Lebanese demeaning their independence was foolish? Shit your anti-Israel agenda has made you an admirer of Assad.
That is an opinion primarily held by either a) people who criticize every war everywhere all the time, and b) people who hate Israel.I don't believe that, at the very best the IDF shows reckless disregard for Arab civilians and that is quite a broadly held opinon. So many times Israel escapes UN condemnation ONLY because of the US (Daddy) Veto.
Initiating the Afghan and Iraqi wars was just and proper. The US badly botched the implementation of the Iraqi war, but that is a different point than the one you are making.Initiating it is rarely so, defensively yes. But I suppose chumps like you would say the Afghan and Iraqi wars were just and proper. If the end of WWi had been handled better, there would have been no WWII. Just as if Israel were to make a proper and just offer to the Palis it could result in a durable peace.
No, it wouldn't, and Israel has never done anything like that, you are blatantly lying. Israel has used percussion strikes to limit collateral damage ever since the technology was available, and in fact has pioneered that aspect of warfare. You simply lose this point. You are shown to be a rabid antisemite hurling made up accusations to incite hatred.Those armories are in civilian areas, it would justify wiping out the whole block which is what Israel does.
1200 people who were mostly Hezbollah terrorists. Job well done. Airports and electrical grids are valid wartime targets as they are militarily significant.Considering Syria ended the Lebanese civil war, yes absolutely it was justified. Once that ended Lebanon was a much better place. Lebanon was a failed state at the time Syria invaded. And frankly, when the Syrians left and returned Lebanon to independence, Israel pummeled it back about 30years in time killing over 1200 people and injuring over 5000 plus the massive damage to important civilian infrastructure like airports and electrical grid. So as horrible as Assad is, the Israelis were even worse to the Lebanese. Would you rather be repressed or bombed?
Nonsense, the airport was already closed by the Lebanese so it just amounted to vandalism and criminality. You don't think Hezbollah has port generators and batteries? One again horseshit. UN accounting of the dead does not sync with what you claim. Of course no one knows for sure but their number would have a smidgen of objectivity.1200 people who were mostly Hezbollah terrorists. Job well done. Airports and electrical grids are valid wartime targets as they are militarily significant.
The took down 2 40 story towers.. so as usual you are full of horseshit.No, it wouldn't, and Israel has never done anything like that, you are blatantly lying. Israel has used percussion strikes to limit collateral damage ever since the technology was available, and in fact has pioneered that aspect of warfare. You simply lose this point. You are shown to be a rabid antisemite hurling made up accusations to incite hatred.
Most sane people now know the Iraqi war was based on a pack of lies. So I see you still support it. Make it pretty clear what you are all about.Initiating the Afghan and Iraqi wars was just and proper. The US badly botched the implementation of the Iraqi war, but that is a different point than the one you are making.
In the present discussion, Israel has never started a way and has in every case been the victim of racist Arab aggression.
If that were true, Israel would not need the Daddy veto so often....H O R S E S H I T.That is an opinion primarily held by either a) people who criticize every war everywhere all the time, and b) people who hate Israel.
It has no bearing in fact. The spectacularly low rate of civilian casualties in the conflict proves it is nonsense.
Another farcical claim. Hamas fires rockets at civilian areas from inside civilian areas. That is a crime against the Geneva convention.Those armories are in civilian areas, it would justify wiping out the whole block which is what Israel does.
Wow. Pretty interesting view.Considering Syria ended the Lebanese civil war, yes absolutely it was justified. Once that ended Lebanon was a much better place. Lebanon was a failed state at the time Syria invaded. And frankly, when the Syrians left and returned Lebanon to independence, Israel pummeled it back about 30years in time killing over 1200 people and injuring over 5000 plus the massive damage to important civilian infrastructure like airports and electrical grid. So as horrible as Assad is, the Israelis were even worse to the Lebanese. Would you rather be repressed or bombed?
So when faced by atrocities in the Arab world you say it's not our place to comment yet when it comes to Israel, you feel the need to spew endlessly.One more point about Syria, I think it is probably wrong of ANYONE (INcluding me) to say much about that conflict as the fact is, no one has any idea about who is doing what to whom. The situation is so murky even the US Govt is utterly paralyzed. Who started it? Maybe Assads thugs did fire on protestors, maybe all the other agitators like the Turks and Saudis were involved. It is IMPOSSIBLE TO SAY FOR SURE. It turns out the Chemical Attack which had the US poised to pummel Syria into oblivion, was really engineered by the Turks... a NATO member!!!! So whatever. All I can say for sure is Syria is FUCKED and is gonna remain FUCKED for a loooooooooong time.
This on the same page where you justified Syria invading Lebanon.Initiating it is rarely so, defensively yes....
