Sounds like the Pan appeal will be based on the wife of one of the jurors, who seemed to be single handedly trying to derail the case. Sigh.
She was attending the case and texting her juror husband stuff the jury wasn't supposed to know about, then interacting with and trying to influence witnesses, including cheering them on in court--until the judge finally banned her from the court room. But the damage may have been done. Judge decided to carry on but that will clearly be challenged in an appeal.
She was attending the case and texting her juror husband stuff the jury wasn't supposed to know about, then interacting with and trying to influence witnesses, including cheering them on in court--until the judge finally banned her from the court room. But the damage may have been done. Judge decided to carry on but that will clearly be challenged in an appeal.