Just to narrow it down about, which graph of the hundreds published, are you referring to? Then explain how it was adjusted. You've recently shown how badly you read graphs so I just want to see if your understand the methodology behind the one you are referring to. It crystal clear you don't understand the methodology of scientific research.
Now, you're just throwing around baseless insults. Unlike some people on this thread, I knew that the Mann-made graph cited earlier was from 2001, not 2013.
As for Groggy's propaganda chart, you can get him to post it again. I don't spend my time searching the propaganda websites.
If he does post it, you will see the chart shows "adjusted" predictions to account for the new premise that the expected warming went into the deep ocean. The predictions for the surface temperatures were then "adjusted."
But, of course, these "adjustments" were only made after the actual studies of the Earth's temperature were already publicly reported.
Anyone can look good making retroactive "predictions" about past events where the outcomes are already known. For example, you don't have to be a brilliant historian to "predict" whether or not Hitler will win World War II.
--
As for the science, one of the clear standards for a credible scientific theory is that it should allow you to always make reliable predictions.
You can't really say that about the man-made CO2 premise, can you?