Utter nonsense.
Apart from all the reasons that have already been provided, you overlook another key point about your false "consensus" -- the studies you point to don't actually reflect the current evidence. For example, the one done by the cartoonist, John Cook, looked at papers written from 1991 to 2011 -- before the Met Office, the IPCC, etc., had confirmed the pause.
In other words, even if your bogus "consensus" were legit, it would still be based on papers that were written
before the new evidence emerged confirming that the computer model predictions have been spectacularly wrong. In other words, it wouldn't apply to the evidence that exists today.
Given your repeated refusal to stick with the flawed computer-model predictions and reject the empirical evidence, I think we know who the "denier" is.
I'm afraid not.
Take another look at the Mann-made table in the IPCC's 2001 report. It shows temperatures skyrocketing in a straight upward fashion (in all of its predictions), regardless of what post-1990 year you pick as your starting point.
http://www.mfe.govt.nz/publications/climate/effects-impacts-may04/html/figures/figure-2-1.html