Seduction Spa

Fox News boss offered employee raise in exchange for sex, biography claims

yung_dood

Banned
Jul 2, 2011
1,698
1
0
http://rt.com/usa/fox-news-ailes-sex-employee-321/


Fox News boss offered employee raise in exchange for sex, biography claims
Published time: January 08, 2014 17:16 Get short URL

Roger Ailes, chairman and CEO of Fox News (Reuters / Fred Prouser)
Tags
Mass media, Scandal, Sex, USA
The impending release of a new book on Fox News executive Roger Ailes brings allegations that the media executive asked for sex from an employee in exchange for a raise, among other things.

The upcoming book, titled “The Loudest Voice in the Room,” is written by New York magazine writer Gabe Sherman and presents a critical look at Ailes, who is described as a powerful figure with an explosive temper.

In a preview of the book, the New York Times highlighted various situations that reportedly unfolded between Ailes and his staff members, including this one from Ailes’ tenure at NBC during the 1980s:

“Former employees cited in the book talked of Mr. Ailes’s volatile temper and domineering behavior,” the Times preview reads. “In one anecdote, a television producer, Randi Harrison, told Mr. Sherman that while negotiating her salary with Mr. Ailes at NBC in the 1980s, he offered her an additional $100 each week “if you agree to have sex with me whenever I want.”

In a separate instance at NBC, Sherman claims that Ailes used an anti-Semitic slur against another rival executive, David Zaslav. While Sherman notes evidence from an investigation that the derogatory term was uttered, both Ailes and Zaslav have denied the allegation.

In a statement, a Fox News spokesperson marked both of the anecdotes mentioned by the Times as false.

“These charges are false. While we have not read the book, the only reality here is that Gabe was not provided any direct access to Roger Ailes and the book was never fact-checked with Fox News.”

While it’s taken over three years for the book to arrive, Fox News has sought to undermine its credibility essentially since Sherman began his work. The author has managed to gather other scoops on Ailes in the past – including one which mentioned the executive thought former Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin is “stupid” – but Fox has repeatedly noted that Sherman has not fact-checked much of his reporting with the network.

Of course, Fox News has become somewhat infamous for its secrecy in these types of situations. Just last month, RT reported that former Fox News executive Brian Lewis had been paid $8 million to keep quiet about the inner workings of the network. Lewis was fired by Ailes in 2013, allegedly in part because he believed Lewis to be the source for some of Sherman’s reporting.

Still, Sherman said he interviewed more than 600 individuals for the book, and that he stands by his work.

“I consider Roger Ailes to be one of the most fascinating, consequential figures in contemporary American life. I wrote this book to shed light on the full scope of his talents and power, which have found their fullest expression at Fox News.”
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
"In a preview of the book, the New York Times highlighted..."

So why did you quote it from Russia Today?
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,768
3
0
The only problem is that everybody else who should have been in a position to have observed these things say that they never occurred.

So basically we have a bunch of unsubstantiated accusations with absolutely no corroboration for them.

And even in the 1980's a $100 a week?

This is another great example of the Sullivan rule at work Roger Ailes is a public figure so the fact that the information is incorrect isn't enough, knowing malice has to be shown.
 

Carling

Banned
Apr 14, 2011
3,562
1
0
The only problem is that everybody else who should have been in a position to have observed these things say that they never occurred.

So basically we have a bunch of unsubstantiated accusations with absolutely no corroboration for them.

And even in the 1980's a $100 a week?

This is another great example of the Sullivan rule at work Roger Ailes is a public figure so the fact that the information is incorrect isn't enough, knowing malice has to be shown.
im guessing most who work at FOX would not want to cross paths with Ailes. considering his very short temper, and love of retribution against those who oppose him... btw didnt he also publicaly call out a colleague , calling him a "little __ jew" ?
 

IM469

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2012
11,140
2,468
113
im guessing most who work at FOX would not want to cross paths with Ailes. considering his very short temper, and love of retribution against those who oppose him...
Absolutely correct. There is little freedom of expression Fox - you tow the party line and use slogans they give you. I'm guessing it is because the average age of a FOX viewer is 103 so the only way to keep a thought alive is to have it parroted by several commentators on many different shows.
 

yung_dood

Banned
Jul 2, 2011
1,698
1
0
Yes, really. When the original source is the NYT, why wouldn't you just quote that directly, instead of quoting a Russian government propaganda agency?
It's a propaganda agency because they report the truth about Israel right?
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
It's a propaganda agency because they report the truth about Israel right?
"Truth" like opening dams that don't exist?

Why don't you make another list of Jews in the media that we know who not to trust.

But, in answer to your question, propaganda agency because it is literally the propaganda agency of the Russian government.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,768
3
0
Asking some TERBites to discuss FOX News rationally is like asking a member of the Women's Christian Temperance Union to discuss alcoholic spirits rationally.
 

yung_dood

Banned
Jul 2, 2011
1,698
1
0
"Truth" like opening dams that don't exist?

Why don't you make another list of Jews in the media that we know who not to trust.

But, in answer to your question, propaganda agency because it is literally the propaganda agency of the Russian government.
You are just dishonest, and don't like facts.
Every news agency is biased.
Fake liberal.
 

yung_dood

Banned
Jul 2, 2011
1,698
1
0
Fuji,

Zionists and jews shouldn't be equated in the same. You are doing a disservice but you can't see that all you so is lie.
 

yung_dood

Banned
Jul 2, 2011
1,698
1
0
I wonder how many news agencies you actually watch. Are you saying that RT is as balanced a news agency as BBC, CNN, or CBC?
I think RT is better than those, I don't watch much TV but RT has reporters who work for non-profit media organizations which speaks to individual credibility.
 

yung_dood

Banned
Jul 2, 2011
1,698
1
0
He knows more than you apparently. How's your story on the dams coming along.
I don't care what a bunch of ignorant, misinformed, and prejudice old men think.
Shit is changing and people are seeing through the BS that most regs on here subscribe too.
 
Toronto Escorts