Chinese cop found guilty white partner gets a pass in G20 incident....
- Thread starter nottyboi
- Start date
Hate to break it to you, you're full of shit. Our flag is red and white and the Liberals are not left in the Canadian political spectrum. The harder you try the sillier you look.I hate to break it to you, but the Libs are considered Left, even in the Peoples Republic of Canada and our red national flag.
Fun thread. An Asian cop does wrong and gets busted for it but it's racism because the judge might have been white.
Seriously? Hitler was Jewish? Damn you've got some pathetic views.They are self-loathing Jews like many claim Hitler was lol....
somebody gets it. :thumb:Fun thread. An Asian cop does wrong and gets busted for it but it's racism because the judge might have been white.
Nuttyboi at his best.
They are seen as center-left. Which is pretty much the way our country leans.Hate to break it to you, you're full of shit. Our flag is red and white and the Liberals are not left in the Canadian political spectrum. The harder you try the sillier you look.
Centre left is not left, nice try.They are seen as center-left. Which is pretty much the way our country leans.
You have never heard that brought up before? Do you live under a rock?Seriously? Hitler was Jewish? Damn you've got some pathetic views.
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/hitlerjew.html
No you leave out the fact that his WHITE partner, who was standing right there as his partner violated someones rights and arrested them for nothing, was let of COMPLETELY SCOTT FREE by said WHITE JUDGE. I guess white cops aren't required to uphold the law or protect civilians from illegal arrest or even protect the Toronto Police from civil liability or disrepute.Fun thread. An Asian cop does wrong and gets busted for it but it's racism because the judge might have been white.
Left of center is ....left. NDP is further left. Tories are right of center... i.e Right. You are a lefty, live with it. If you are a cop, you live of the govt teat away, so why not embrace it.Centre left is not left, nice try.
And you seem to ignore the fact that his white partner was not found guilty of anything. I guess the convicted cop should get off because he wasn't white. After all, non-whites don't do anything wrong, the whites are always racist. Your attitude is racist against whites. You're just as bad - likely worse - than those you oppose in this thread.No you leave out the fact that his WHITE partner, who was standing right there as his partner violated someones rights and arrested them for nothing, was let of COMPLETELY SCOTT FREE by said WHITE JUDGE. I guess white cops aren't required to uphold the law or protect civilians from illegal arrest or even protect the Toronto Police from civil liability or disrepute.
You really are a hoot. you have no idea what you are talking about, read or listen to some political science analysis. You don't have to be dead centre in the middle to called a centrist party.Left of center is ....left. NDP is further left. Tories are right of center... i.e Right. You are a lefty, live with it. If you are a cop, you live of the govt teat away, so why not embrace it.
I'll start you out slowly with one of your favourite sources;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_Party_of_Canada
The principles of the party are based on liberalism as defined by various liberal theorists and include individual freedom for present and future generations, responsibility, human dignity, a just society, political freedom, religious freedom, national unity, equality of opportunity, cultural diversity, bilingualism, and multilateralism.[9][10] In the present times, the Liberal party has favoured a variety of policies from both right and left of the political spectrum. When it formed the government from 1993 to 2006, it was a strong champion of balanced budgets, and eliminated the budget deficit completely from the federal budget in 1995 by reducing spending on social programs or delegating them to the provinces, and promised to replace the Goods and Services Tax in the party's famous Red Book.[11] It also legalized same-sex marriage and the use of cannabis for medical purposes, and had proposed complete decriminalization of possession of small amounts of it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_spectrum
A political spectrum is a system of classifying different political positions upon one or more geometric axes that symbolize independent political dimensions.
Most long-standing spectra include a right wing and left wing, which originally referred to seating arrangements in the French parliament after the Revolution (1789–99).[1] According to the simplest left-right axis, communism and socialism are usually regarded internationally as being on the left, opposite fascism and conservatism on the right. Liberalism can mean different things in different contexts, sometimes on the left (social liberalism), sometimes on the right (economic liberalism). Politics that rejects the conventional left–right spectrum is known as syncretic politics.[2][3] Those with an intermediate outlook are classified as centrists or moderates.
Political scientists have frequently noted that a single left–right axis is insufficient for describing the existing variation in political beliefs, and often include other axes. Though the descriptive words at polar opposites may vary, often in popular biaxial spectra the axes are split between sociocultural issues and economic issues, each scaling from some form of individualism (or government for the freedom of the individual) to some form of communitarianism (or government for the welfare of the community).[citation needed] In this context, the contemporary American left is often considered individualist (or libertarian) on sociocultural issues and communitarian (or populist) on economic issues, while the contemporary American right is often considered communitarian (or populist) on sociocultural issues and individualist (or libertarian) on economic issues.
You don't understand even the most basics elements of the politics of your own country, shame.
You are claiming the party that legalized gay marriage is centrist? The libs are very socially progressive, have a legacy of social justice and wealth redistribution. They may occasionally do things that are viewed as right wing like reduce spending, but they are by any recognized standard LEFT. Even the NDP has preached fiscal responsibility from time to time. If you look at it historically the vast majority of the time it has been left...with occasional moves towards the center. Perhaps you find being identified as a lefty offensive, but you are. Canada as a whole is a socialist country. And you support large social programs like the Police. So live with it.You really are a hoot. you have no idea what you are talking about, read or listen to some political science analysis. You don't have to be dead centre in the middle to called a centrist party.
I'll start you out slowly with one of your favourite sources;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_Party_of_Canada
The principles of the party are based on liberalism as defined by various liberal theorists and include individual freedom for present and future generations, responsibility, human dignity, a just society, political freedom, religious freedom, national unity, equality of opportunity, cultural diversity, bilingualism, and multilateralism.[9][10] In the present times, the Liberal party has favoured a variety of policies from both right and left of the political spectrum. When it formed the government from 1993 to 2006, it was a strong champion of balanced budgets, and eliminated the budget deficit completely from the federal budget in 1995 by reducing spending on social programs or delegating them to the provinces, and promised to replace the Goods and Services Tax in the party's famous Red Book.[11] It also legalized same-sex marriage and the use of cannabis for medical purposes, and had proposed complete decriminalization of possession of small amounts of it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_spectrum
A political spectrum is a system of classifying different political positions upon one or more geometric axes that symbolize independent political dimensions.
Most long-standing spectra include a right wing and left wing, which originally referred to seating arrangements in the French parliament after the Revolution (1789–99).[1] According to the simplest left-right axis, communism and socialism are usually regarded internationally as being on the left, opposite fascism and conservatism on the right. Liberalism can mean different things in different contexts, sometimes on the left (social liberalism), sometimes on the right (economic liberalism). Politics that rejects the conventional left–right spectrum is known as syncretic politics.[2][3] Those with an intermediate outlook are classified as centrists or moderates.
Political scientists have frequently noted that a single left–right axis is insufficient for describing the existing variation in political beliefs, and often include other axes. Though the descriptive words at polar opposites may vary, often in popular biaxial spectra the axes are split between sociocultural issues and economic issues, each scaling from some form of individualism (or government for the freedom of the individual) to some form of communitarianism (or government for the welfare of the community).[citation needed] In this context, the contemporary American left is often considered individualist (or libertarian) on sociocultural issues and communitarian (or populist) on economic issues, while the contemporary American right is often considered communitarian (or populist) on sociocultural issues and individualist (or libertarian) on economic issues.
You don't understand even the most basics elements of the politics of your own country, shame.
Are you retarded? I am saying the white partner was found not guilty BECAUSE he was white. He was, in my view, equally culpable and at the very least should have been charged with dereliction of duty for not restraining his moronic partner. I can't believe so many people support this nonsense that leads to large civil payments from the taxpayers. Man, we really deserve the shit show we get.And you seem to ignore the fact that his white partner was not found guilty of anything. I guess the convicted cop should get off because he wasn't white. After all, non-whites don't do anything wrong, the whites are always racist. Your attitude is racist against whites. You're just as bad - likely worse - than those you oppose in this thread.
As posted earlier, the liberal party take views and goals from both the left and right go the spectrum, that's why they are considered a centrist party. Clearly yoU didn't read or didn't understand what was just posted on the liberal party.You are claiming the party that legalized gay marriage is centrist? The libs are very socially progressive, have a legacy of social justice and wealth redistribution. They may occasionally do things that are viewed as right wing like reduce spending, but they are by any recognized standard LEFT. Even the NDP has preached fiscal responsibility from time to time. If you look at it historically the vast majority of the time it has been left...with occasional moves towards the center. Perhaps you find being identified as a lefty offensive, but you are. Canada as a whole is a socialist country. And you support large social programs like the Police. So live with it.
Read more slowly this time;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_Party_of_Canada
The principles of the party are based on liberalism as defined by various liberal theorists and include individual freedom for present and future generations, responsibility, human dignity, a just society, political freedom, religious freedom, national unity, equality of opportunity, cultural diversity, bilingualism, and multilateralism.[9][10] In the present times, the Liberal party has favoured a variety of policies from 'both right and left of the political spectrum'. When it formed the government from 1993 to 2006, it was a strong champion of balanced budgets, and eliminated the budget deficit completely from the federal budget in 1995 by reducing spending on social programs or delegating them to the provinces, and promised to replace the Goods and Services Tax in the party's famous Red Book.[11] It also legalized same-sex marriage and the use of cannabis for medical purposes, and had proposed complete decriminalization of possession of small amounts of it.
Considering I was too young to vote when Duplessis's Union National party ran Quebec, I'm not quite sure what makes you think I would have, especially since I lived in Quebec during the last years of his tenure and I'm well aware of his administrations actions and the turmoil his 15 year reign caused. Your assumption about my insight into the WR or Reform Parties just shows how ignorant you are in your rant. I understand there are difference between Conservative and and conservative, but neither applies to me. Any of these fancy questionnaires that are often posted on TERB and in other publications clearly show I am centrist, and my voting history definitely shows that, but then you know better (in your own little head).
Wow. Such utter fail in understanding the point. But keep on looking down on everyone else.
Clearly WFI is just flapping his cakes hole. Asked for details on his claim this retread clams up and runs away to his cave.So Einstein, where am I wrong? It shouldn't be hard for a wannabe pundit like you to explain it.
Usually brought up by members of Stormfront and the like to justify continued anti-semitism.You have never heard that brought up before? Do you live under a rock?
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/hitlerjew.html
p.s. Let me quote directly from the source you linked.
Despite the claims, Adolf Hitler was not Jewish.
You are leaving out the fact that the Asian cop did wrong by his own choice not his partner's.No you leave out the fact that his WHITE partner,....
I'm sure with your vast background in the law you will be on the bench for the next case.... He was, in my view....
This would be ironic if there were to be a protest about non-white cops (racist justice system) being charged during the G20 protests. LOL!!!
