Hi Bob, thanks for your comments and insight. I will have to respectfully disagree. Allow me to illustrate...That is a great Hustler cover Kirk! And Art, I'm afraid that most of the pictures you posted, I'd think of as "no bush". At least approximately.
There's little question that bare is the current fashion. Unfortunately, it's a fashion that almost certainly found its wellspring in pornography - and I understand why some women rail against that. But, I miss bush. Not George, not George W., bush. The feel against your hand the first time you got your hand into her panties, the wild way it looks, the way it holds the scent. I believe, some biologists will tell you this is likely the primary reason we still have hair... to hold the smells of our loins, because those smells are a sexual attractant.
I think the discussion about hygiene is a red herring. This is mostly a fashion issue. (Though, catching a hair in your throat is a nuisance.)
I know eh?Um... is the first picture even a real woman? I look at the uniformity of texture and it seems more likely that it's plastic.
Done that on a few occasions, one has to be VERY careful not to nick such a delicate part of a woman’s anatomy.And my desire is COMPLETELY different!
So that mean I need to dye my patch half pink?I'm surprised no one has mentioned how nice it is when a nicely trimmed patch of colour is the same as the hair on her head. Nothing is nicer than a soft pelt of blonde or red hair! But bald is better than a mismatch
Or get rid of it all together!So that mean I need to dye my patch half pink?
This doesn't make sense. Or if it does, it's in the same way that some men just can't grow a proper Movember moustache. Unless intense, constant grooming, trimming, waxing, depilitating etc destroys the hair follicles.dayum those pics make me envious.
I can't grow pubes ... I've tried to grow a nice landing strip and it just won't grow in. I've had gents say they'd rather a little hair, but I have to disappoint.
You would really think its a good idea to be showing and discussing porn with a 13 year old? Sounds like great hypothetical parenting...And I hate to say it, but from the photos offered I even find landing strips contrived, at least from a GFE POV--then again, from a GFE POV said photos are, like all glossy posed porn, "contrived" in and of themselves. In the sense that I'd tell my hypothetical 13-year-old kid: "Son, real women aren't like that. Nor do I expect you to force them to look like that."
Did I say anything about showing him porn? After all, I might be stumbling across him looking at porn, or talking about it w/his peers...You would really think its a good idea to be showing and discussing porn with a 13 year old? Sounds like great hypothetical parenting...
If they are "work in progress" pictures of you, then absolutely!What about talking of pubic hairs on women over the age of 18 years old and forgetting about kids that may or may not watch porn?
or those this thread need more pics?
I agree. Sincerely, Jon .What about talking of pubic hairs on women over the age of 18 years old and forgetting about kids that may or may not watch porn?
or those this thread need more pics?
Malika, why don't you show us some pics of yours and we can all vote?What about talking of pubic hairs on women over the age of 18 years old and forgetting about kids that may or may not watch porn?
or those this thread need more pics?