Hopefully you are not walking past a grove of notched trees when they decide to fall like dominoes. All of these neat tricks are just that tricks. It better to fall the tree when you're read to do it and control it, hopefully when no one else is walking nearby.OK
legitimate problems
1 a big enough notch and the tree is gonna fall on its own esp after it dies. The bigger the notch the quicker it will fall and with experience you will learn the proper notch to make
2 You have to be aware of falling into other trees but what if you intentionally get it to fall into another notched tree which falls into another notched tree??
They will fall like dominoes ??????????
But i suppose this is one of many methods you will use to fell a tree
A very, very clever way follows
During the summer take a long shanked auger, bore two holes, one above the other, at an angle so they will meet inside;
Wait for winter to come then after some snow falls put some pitch fagots into the upper hole then lite them , the flame will cause air and smoke to rise from the upper hole causing a suction of air from the lower hole, acting like a blow furnace. The portion of the tree inside of the sap being of a pitchy nature will burn rapidly and in a short time it will roar like a huge furnace.
If you do this in the winter you will not have an uncontrolled burn as the embers will land on a snow covered tree
Also, girdling the tree in the summer and killing it may improve the burn and make auguring easier, I am unsure as the resin itself may increase the burn
I do not know for sure as I am guessing but it is interesting idea that should be extremely effective once the details are worked out
The best part is the minimal labor as you never touch an axe and are left with a burned stump that you can let rot or slow burn with charcoal
Also , the residue will quickly become fertilizer
InterestingYou'll find the actual first-hand accounts in Roughing it in the Bush by Susannah Moodie and the books and journals of her sister Catherine Parr Trail. They make good reading, especially by a winter fire, and since they were settling in the empty wilderness between Port Hope and Peterborough, there's a local angle.
First they felled the trees and cultivated between the deadfalls as they slowly cut them up for firewood or building materials, hired someone with a team to drag them to the water's edge—with few roads everyone and everything had to go by water—or onto the ice to await breakup and perhaps profit downriver. Somewhere in the process money/bartered goods or services and ownership changed hands. Brush was piled and burned, along with whole trees that were excess to needs, or too troublesome to cut with handsaws, just as settlers do today in forested parts like the Amazon. That took years, and the stumps took much, much, much longer. The ladies describe it all, and much more in a very readable style.
The really commercial timber trade with Britain pillaged the boreal forests further north and ran down the Ottawa River to be loaded in Montreal. Toronto was upstream of the Lachine rapids (Getting past them is also in Moodie and Trail) and inaccessible from the sea until after canals were built. By then the Lake Ontario country was well settled and under the plough. The attempts to link clear-cutting with farming in northwest country up the Opeongo Road from Bytown/Ottawa were mostly sad failures because the Shield grew nothing well but pine. And some sad folk-songs.
The fire does the work of getting rid of the treas, unless you have a more useful idea, like building a cabin, or making money selling them (but as you say, the transport's the bitch). You leave the stumps until planting and harvesting for your own survival doesn't take all your time. The ones that are really in the way, you probably try to minimize with the cheapest resources—you pile wood on the stump and burn it.My question is how did they minimalism the hard labor
Cutting all the trees down creates two problems
1 WTF do you do with the trees?
2 WTF do you do with the stumps?
Even if you pull out the stumps out you got a hole in the ground but that is too much work anyway
Burning the stumps with charcoal sounds good then letting them rot as this allows the stumps to turn into fertilizer
Selling the trees sounds like a way to make a living as you clear the land
England needed lumber so the good trees could be cut at a mill then sailed over I would a think
But you need to be near a mill on a river as transporting a tree with horses through a forest would take a long time
Logs pile up in rapids and create jams, so very early on folks built chutes and flumes to carry them past. I wouldn't know if there were any at Lachine, but there definitely were at Ottawa to bypass the Chaudiere, and riding the timber rafts was a diversion offered to visiting dignitaries. While there were all sorts of local mills and local demand all over Ontario, I've not come across anything I recall about a serious timber trade with Britain except the northern one.Interesting
I was waiting for Old Jones to offer his insight
I was unaware that the Lachine rapids made Toronto inaccessible by Ocean going boats
All the goods had to be portaged which would have created income for some immigrants
However, this would not stop the transportation of logs as they could float over the rapids to be picked up downstream
I still wonder if the better hardwood trees would have made it to England this way and provided income to the settlers
The trees were certainly used locally but the bigger market would have been Europe as they had cut down most of their trees over the centuries
As you state, getting the trees to market was a huge problem for a farmer unless he lived by a huge stream or nearer to the lake
Dragging the trees any distance would have been very hard. They would have used a team but I wonder how they did it exactly
Maybe wait until winter when the land is hard and no rain to bog you down
As you state, I suspect this was a trade on its own and the farmers never hauled the trees and which gave them much needed financial relief, i suspect
As for how they burned the trees they did not want, as well as the stumps, I speculate on this in post 40
The fire does the work of getting rid of the treas, unless you have a more useful idea, like building a cabin, or making money selling them (but as you say, the transport's the bitch). You leave the stumps until planting and harvesting for your own survival doesn't take all your time. The ones that are really in the way, you probably try to minimize with the cheapest resources—you pile wood on the stump and burn it.
The only way charcoal is cheap is if you make it yourself, or do a deal with an itinerant charcoal burner to give you some in exchange for the wood he needs. He's only going to 'happen by' if he can get his product out to market. As a man with horses can make an easier living faster than charcoal burning, he's either shipping by water right from your property, or there's already a road and decently cheap teamsters doing decent business nearby. Although excess logs often went into road building, that suggests your property's beyond the stump-clogged phase already.
Eventually stump removal does get done, and horse-powered stump-pulling machines are part of any decent antique equipment collection or display. If you have the labour and somewhat pricey tools—chains, pulleys and rope, saws, shovels and axes you can keep sharp in the dirt, a guy can DIY a lot of stumps with sheer-legs and block and tackle, but just as to-day. a specialist contractor with the equipment is often a better plan. If you have the money.
What we XXIC guys forget is that the only way to do stuff fast in pioneer times was to put more men and horses to work on it, and both were scarce in the new land. Unless you were someone with means and money and could buy help, you'd long ago gotten used to the fact that this new land of yours was a lifetime project that your children would be seeing through after you were gone. For people wgo might spend a whole year without needing cash money, stuff happened slow.
Just as today; you do what you can the best you can. What you can't do, you cope with.
The Lachine Canal was built in the early 19th century to by pass the rapids and deepened and powered later to make it open to larger heavier ships. The opening of the St Lawrence Seaway in the late 50's was the next step and the system that made the the canal outdatedInteresting
I was waiting for Old Jones to offer his insight
I was unaware that the Lachine rapids made Toronto inaccessible by Ocean going boats
All the goods had to be portaged which would have created income for some immigrants
However, this would not stop the transportation of logs as they could float over the rapids to be picked up downstream
I still wonder if the better hardwood trees would have made it to England this way and provided income to the settlers
The trees were certainly used locally but the bigger market would have been Europe as they had cut down most of their trees over the centuries
As you state, getting the trees to market was a huge problem for a farmer unless he lived by a huge stream or nearer to the lake
Dragging the trees any distance would have been very hard. They would have used a team but I wonder how they did it exactly
Maybe wait until winter when the land is hard and no rain to bog you down
As you state, I suspect this was a trade on its own and the farmers never hauled the trees and which gave them much needed financial relief, i suspect
As for how they burned the trees they did not want, as well as the stumps, I speculate on this in post 40
Considering a team of large horse can pull over 5000 pounds it wouldn't be much work to pull a prepared stump especially if you involve the use of a simple lever, block and tackle. or windlass.Didn't they use work horses to pull stumps too? This isn't a mystery or as tough like building the pyramids (or they didn't need thousands of slaves either). They plowed with oxen if not work horses.
Waiting 20-30 years is almost a lifetime back then.Removing stumps makes no sense to me
After all that work now you now got to drag them somewhere and the end result is a hole in the ground and a trench where you dragged the stump
Allow them to rot then turn into fertilizer over 20-30 years or whatever .
You can speed this process with a charcoal or pitch induced smolder of the stump
If you are going to burn some wood anyways you might as well pile it onto a stump and kill two birds with one stone
Biological warfare might have been termites or worm bores but I doubt they used this tactic
As far as labor goes, I wonder how important escaped slaves were as they came up here for freedom and would have been a very cheap and hard working labor force
There is also the Irish escaping the great potato famine but not until 1840
We told them a bunch of lies to get them over here then had them die building the canals - a dark past of Canada when we were still British
Waiting 20-30 years is almost a lifetime back then.
Actually the puritans told the Irish and Scots they'd give them free land, but the catch was that the free land was on the frontier between the settlements and the indian nations, THANKS.
The Lachine Canal was built in the early 19th century to by pass the rapids and deepened and powered later to make it open to larger heavier ships. The opening of the St Lawrence Seaway in the late 50's was the next step and the system that made the the canal outdated
Needless to say it depends upon where they were - the boreal forest is one thing clearing land in Southern Ontario or even earlier along the East Coast of the U.S. is another.So how many trees do you girdle? It takes a long time for a single tree to die and decay to the point of falling over. What do you do if the tree doesn't fall over free of other trees (a very dangerous situation) a very common in the largest forest in the world.
If the tree you're pulling is a conifer the hole is very shallow and can be turned into something useful like a midden. Not all stumps were removed. Cutting them close to the ground and pile dirt from other holes or mounds was another way. It must have been the way to go because the cut a tow away was the way they used. They were pretty smart when developing good ways to do manual labour.Yes
But it is the way that makes the most sense
Remove the stump and you got a hole in the ground
Let it rot into fertilizer
As each year goes by the land becomes worth more so you can sell or hold for your children
Horses have greater "acceleration" and can pull more rapidly. Oxen have greater endurance and can pull heavier loads. Hence oxen are more suitable for heavy tasks such as plowing in wet, heavy or clayey soil or breaking sod. So in this case if you want a jerk on the stump - horses, if you want greater long term pulling on the stump - oxen.Didn't they use work horses to pull stumps too? . . . They plowed with oxen if not work horses.
Toronto/York may have been a bad choice for a lumber mill for export business and more suitable for local consumption. If you can't carry the load you don't portage it. You really can't efficiently carry/hump lumber overland. When you transport cut lumber you have less of a choice of what you can do with it at the other and just as much of a chance of damage .It has to be pre-sold before shipping.Transport timber and your choices are numerous and damage can be dealt with by selective cutting.Until then you had to portage everything going to Europe or coming from Europe
Cutting the trees into boards at Toronto then sailing them to the rapids then portaging around the rapids to waiting ocean going vessels seems doable
Hopefully you are not walking past a grove of notched trees when they decide to fall like dominoes. All of these neat tricks are just that tricks. It better to fall the tree when you're read to do it and control it, hopefully when no one else is walking nearby.
The size of the notch to do what you ask it to do is already quite large so why not cut the tree down under controlled conditions and not have to return later to harvest the tree. You require two round trips to do it your way, cut, let fall, and harvest, but one round trip to do it the simpler way of cut and harvest.Cant see the problem here
You would be wary of a notched tree and not eat your lunch under it nor plant crops near it
It is well marked for all those who are trespassing
Saving labor ideas would be the most valuable tool you have although i do not know if this idea was used but i cannot see why other then you would not have the same clean cut as if you felled it but if you plan to burn the tree a clean cut would not matter
Evolution says stumps do not rot fast, nor do they succumb to termites; that's why trees don't suddenly fall down because the roots rotted or were eaten, and a reason for making fences outta them. You can still see two hundred year old stump fences that are sound.Removing stumps makes no sense to me
After all that work now you now got to drag them somewhere and the end result is a hole in the ground and a trench where you dragged the stump
Allow them to rot then turn into fertilizer over 20-30 years or whatever .
You can speed this process with a charcoal or pitch induced smolder of the stump
If you are going to burn some wood anyways you might as well pile it onto a stump and kill two birds with one stone
Biological warfare might have been termites or worm bores but I doubt they used this tactic
…
Toronto/York may have been a bad choice for a lumber mill for export business and more suitable for local consumption. If you can't carry the load you don't portage it. You really can't efficiently carry/hump lumber overland. When you transport cut lumber you have less of a choice of what you can do with it at the other and just as much of a chance of damage .It has to be pre-sold before shipping.Transport timber and your choices are numerous and damage can be dealt with by selective cutting.