Gawker Claims Video Exists of Rob Ford Smoking Crack
- Thread starter Phil C. McNasty
- Start date
Crack Nation lives.Do you actually believe your own bullshit Fuji?Or are you just spewing drivel for our amusement. (It is rather comical, I have to admit! :rofl
What you submit as proof... is laughable at best. And really just a load of hearsay. The "mainstream newspaper" has an obvious hidden agenda, and the Gawker is hardly credible.
An actual video surfacing would be a start. And a drug test would also be acceptable. (Good luck with that one too...)
As for weird internet kooks, I suggest you look in the mirror...
Oh and BTW:
Rob Ford was smoking from a pipe in a video which will soon surface, a substance which will be admitted to be pipe tobacco, downgraded from crack cocaine ( racist ghetto connotations ) to hashish( more socially acceptable, no racism) to perfectly legal pipe tobacco. Or maybe it was medical marijuana?
I was not surprised at all to hear about Rob Ford smoking crack.
I however was very surprised that many people find this news surprising!
I however was very surprised that many people find this news surprising!
I just heard from someone who said he grew up with Rob Ford and are still good friends and he told me that both Doug and Rob will soon be resigning their positions to focus on suing The Star, Globe & Mail, Gawker, all other media and some Terbites on this thread.
Again: Only weird kooks think that a major newspaper like the Star would fabricate an entire story. That is looney tunes.Do you actually believe your own bullshit Fuji?
What you submit as proof... is laughable at best. And really just a load of hearsay. The "mainstream newspaper" has an obvious hidden agenda, and the Gawker is hardly credible.
Certainly the Star has a bias, and it shows up in the way that all respectable newspaper show their bias: They select stories that will appeal to their readers, and they invest their resources on finding out the things their readers want to know about. That selection bias in the case of the Star means they are willing to pay to have their reporters chase around finding out dirt about Ford, rather than chasing around finding out dirt about Adam Vaughan (the Sun does that).
It does not mean they make up the dirt they find. It just means that they are selective in whose dirt they find--but they do report accurately about what they find.
This claim you have that the whole video is just a fraud by the Star puts you so far out in left field you're going to have to ask for directions to the ball park.
There's another angle fuji, maybe Gawker saw some video, reported it back to the Star and the Star then reported it as fact (without seeing the video). Then the story snowballed into a huge story which the Star didnt anticipate, and now its too late for them to back out.
I admit thats a very small probability, but it is remotely possible
Until the video is seen by everyone and made public everything is hearsay. We can all spew opinions but until we actually see the video it's all bullshit. Sooner or later half this thread will have to eat a shit samich and admit they were wrong.
Zero proof means zero truth. <----- master rhymes.
Zero proof means zero truth. <----- master rhymes.
Why is no one from the media asking Ford about the Metrolinx report hahahahahaha.
What I compare being mayor of Toronto to is swimming with the sharks, and sooner or later you’re going to get bitten by the media. And no wonder, politics are made for people who can work with others and be discrete and don’t have rumours of videos of them smoking crack. And my heart bleeds for him when he gets killed in the pres , but it’s his own fault at the end of the day.
What I compare being mayor of Toronto to is swimming with the sharks, and sooner or later you’re going to get bitten by the media. And no wonder, politics are made for people who can work with others and be discrete and don’t have rumours of videos of them smoking crack. And my heart bleeds for him when he gets killed in the pres , but it’s his own fault at the end of the day.
Many don’t care what the truth is, they just want that "fat fuck" Ford gone. Ford cutting a billion dollars in government spending has many people who relied on that gravy very pissed off.
Bit surprised Gawker raised the $200K, now what…
Bet he has the word "GRAVY" on his business cards.
Printed by his company DECO and invoiced to the city
Bit surprised a Crack Nation (oops, Ford Nation) supporter hasn't started a crowd source fund to support Mr. Ford's law suit against Star, Globe, Sun, National Post, Gawker & Terb . . .
i'm not checking but i think 2 reporters and 1 editor saw the video. of course, seeing it on a iphone limits viewability. and any actor could have pretended to be mr ford. but mr ford's lack of denial has me suspicious. he's elusive so he doesn't get caught in an absolute lie. "i do not do crack"
Supposedly there's two copies of this video floating around. IMO its highly unlikely both drug dealers will pass on $200,000. One of the two will somehow try and collect the cash, so I think the video will come out within next few days
Any actor could have pretended to be Ford? Au contraire, mon frere. His unique Baron Harkonnen girth requires a lifetime dedicated to gluttony and sloth that would be difficult to replicate.
BTW Robyn Doolittle going on and one about multiple copies of the video being 'in play' etc is giving me a terrible case of political blueballs.
BTW Robyn Doolittle going on and one about multiple copies of the video being 'in play' etc is giving me a terrible case of political blueballs.
I didn't vote for him. I even believe he has done some good things and made an important contribution to Toronto by demonstrating how badly Torontonians want to see their City run efficiently.
But he is a poster child for Buffoonery and a very sorry example of a leader. Hopefully, this experience will teach people to make a bigger investment of time and attention in city politics. You get the government you deserve.
