❤ « ¥our Favorite » ▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀ UNFORGETTABLE _________ PLAYMATE!!!! ▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀ ❤ - 21

[coyoteblue]

« ¥our Favorite » ▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀ UNFORGETTABLE _________ PLAYMATE!!!! ▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀ - 21

Any info on this one? She posts simultaneously on BP for Belleville, Peterborough and Kingston. I have tried contacting her by text and email, quotes a different price each time, i.e., 1 hr for 220 to 350 or 2 hours from 550 to 650. Then always asks for gas money as she says she has to travel.

http://peterborough.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/our-favorite-unforgettable-_-playmate-21/14796360
http://belleville.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/s-e-x-i-e-s-t-i-n-t-h-e-c-i-t-y-21/14797354
http://kingston.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/unforgettable-21/14847196

 

[Cowboy Kenny]

At 21 she still has a lot to learn about marketing and sales technique, this one sentence speaks volumes, be it intentional or not....

Available 4 Wealthy, Mature, Respectful, Discreet and Polite, Gentlemen ONLY

First of using a 4 instead of typing "for" is just plain lazy, but that's a minor pet peve, when she lists WEALTHY as the first quality she's seeking in a client I'm almost certain the service wont live up to the claims made or fees charged. In fact it's a real turnoff, to me anyways. She's not an escort, she's a gold digger.

 

[racks180]

Well said Kenny , I have seen this add on BP for a few weeks now , and thought the same thing when I read the " wealthy " part.

 

[Sgt Banger]

At 21 she still has a lot to learn about marketing and sales technique, this one sentence speaks volumes, be it intentional or not....

Available 4 Wealthy, Mature, Respectful, Discreet and Polite, Gentlemen ONLY

First of using a 4 instead of typing "for" is just plain lazy, but that's a minor pet peve, when she lists WEALTHY as the first quality she's seeking in a client I'm almost certain the service wont live up to the claims made or fees charged. In fact it's a real turnoff, to me anyways. She's not an escort, she's a gold digger.

I beg to disagree. It's the equivalent to advertising appointments with generous gentlemen all it means is no discounted rates, you pay market or above, not a red flag in my opinion.

 

[Cowboy Kenny]

I understand what you’re saying **for me it raises a bit of a red flag. I’m just cautious about a providers priorities when the size of the clients wallet is more important to her than other factors that make for a good client.**
**
She will soon learn if she hasn’t already** that a rich client does not **necessarily make for a good client. **A client who saves or budgets to spend time with SPs is likely to value the encounter more and make the most of a session.
**
In my private business I can say for certain that I enjoy working with smaller clients who have to watch the bottom line, they are more passionate engaged and communicative about their projects with me, while other clients be they corporate or just have bigger budgets can sometimes tend to be more demanding, non-communicative and have a certain sense of expectation.** This is not always the case, but it does happen frequently. I’ve spoken with many providers who prefer and appreciate the company of the guest who works hard for his hobby money.
**
Different strokes for different folks, for me it’s a turn off but I understand and respect for others that it is not.

 

[Sgt Banger]

I don't see how you can extrapolate that she is more concerned about the size of her client's wallet. In the same one liner she mentions maturity, respect, discreetness and politeness. She seems pretty level headed to me.

 

[Cowboy Kenny]

I just can, it's my opinion that's all. I'm not looking to stir things up. When I'm dealing with an sp prior to meeting or even when meeting and the focus is on $$$ then it's likely not going to be the best encounter, asking for gas money on top of nearly 7 bills for two hours pretty much sums it up. I may be wrong, but I know she's definitely not for me.

 

[Sgt Banger]

I think you we're too judgemental with her. Her ad stresses respect and maturity and politeness. You can't fault her for being clear that because she travels she is going to be at or above market and nothing wrong asking for a supplement for gas if she has to travel out of her way, that too is pretty standard stuff.

 

[LikeRedHeads]

She is not even pretty and loooking for wealthy men. Her problem is "are wealthy men looking for someone like her?" If I were wealthy I would probably stick with very pretty girls only who offer incredible service. Not her case at all (at least on the looks factor).

 

[Cowboy Kenny]

Sgt, I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. I'm entitled to my opinion as you are to yours.

I wasn't even going to venture down the "looks" path, as it's subjective but yes that's a factor as well. This whole hobby is subjective when you get right down to it. As for gas money, it's the cost of doing buisness. It makes sense to charge a transportation fee on a 200 dollar hour long appointment but for nearly 700 bills for two hours from a moderately attractive woman, with grainy cell phone pics that no one has heard of , I wonder if she bills the client for the condoms, lube and wipes used. meh it's all just a turn off, for me any ways.

Perhaps if she's not looking to attract discount hunters and tire kickers she shouldn't advertise on Backpage, as discussed in another thread there are sites better suited for those seeking wealthy gentleman.

What will be interesting to see is if anyone from around here does see her. Sgt, this would make a great inaugural review for you to post! Just kidding, I'm sure if she's worth her fee we'll be hearing much more about her.

 

[Sgt Banger]

Your last post is just more character assassination on a provider you haven't seen and no one has reviewed yet, insinuating that she would charge for condoms and the like, just because she happened to mention she prefers to cater to wealthy clients. Calling her a gold digger and not an escort seems excessive don't you think ? The poor girl is trying to earn a living and you are slamming her for advertising for higher end clients. Maybe she is lacking in experience and will need to adjust her ad commensurate with her attitude, service level and looks, only time will tell, but you're just a little too judgmental in my opinion on the poor girl right out of the gate.

 

[Catherine St.Claire]

Your last post is just more character assassination on a provider you haven't seen and no one has reviewed yet, insinuating that she would charge for condoms and the like, just because she happened to mention she prefers to cater to wealthy clients. Calling her a gold digger and not an escort seems excessive don't you think ? The poor girl is trying to earn a living and you are slamming her for advertising for higher end clients. Maybe she is lacking in experience and will need to adjust her ad comensurate with her attitude, service level and looks, only time will tell, but your just a little too presumptuous in my opinion on the poor girl right out of the gate.

Unfortunately, this is the nature of this business and it has developed on the boards for good reason. Clients have had decades of bad service, dishonest business and unethical providers. The boards have given hobbyists the opportunity to sometimes protect themselves from this but have a tendency to get a little out of hand at times. The one thing that doesn't change are the red flags that go up when an ad doesn't appeal to those that watch these things meticulously. There are many, many new providers that come "out of the gate" with preconceived ideas about escorting and they don't realize that they need to design their ads with great care in order to ensure those flags don't get raised. If she is a solid provider, this will pass and she'll earn her stripes. I read her ad, she obviously doesn't realize how it reads and I think she is probably much prettier in person. Being photogenic isn't a given and many providers sparkle in real life but it doesn't present in their pictures.

When I landed in Ottawa I had a thread like this with comments like "she must have worked at a gas station before to think she can raise her prices like this" and "she has no clue what she's doing, she must be brand new to the business". I didn't respond, I simply did what I do best; I proved them wrong and here I am. Still standing and playing in Ottawa and surrounding areas in the most delicious ways I know how...

cat

 

[igotaboner]

Your last post is just more character assassination on a provider you haven't seen and no one has reviewed yet, insinuating that she would charge for condoms and the like, just because she happened to mention she prefers to cater to wealthy clients. Calling her a gold digger and not an escort seems excessive don't you think ? The poor girl is trying to earn a living and you are slamming her for advertising for higher end clients. Maybe she is lacking in experience and will need to adjust her ad commensurate with her attitude, service level and looks, only time will tell, but you're just a little too judgmental in my opinion on the poor girl right out of the gate.

You're being hard on our Cowboy who has been doing this and outing frauds for a lot of years. CK has a great history of sniffing out the poor business practices and down right fakery that goes on in this trade. If he says there are red flags you're best to take note. CK gave me my first referral when I got into this hobby and ever after I've trusted his wisdom and judgement. When you've been around a little longer than 3 months maybe you'll learn to appreciate that some folks here have seen the angles once or twice and can read between the lines.

 

[Sgt Banger]

Don't get me wrong I appreciate Cowboy's service to the community and he has saved me a few shekels over the many years of hobbying, mostly using tineye and his investigative reporting, but you've got to use your brain boner and your independent judgment. On this one Cowboy jumped the gun in my opinion, and read too much into the ad. Let's see what happens with her. What I was railing against was a little premature ejaculation on his part let's say.
Most girls don't like that

 

[harboursmoke]

In txt she told me today 350 p/hr... Nope not for me... I have a hard time going over the 200 p/hr line.

 

[Eddie401]

Your last post is just more character assassination on a provider you haven't seen and no one has reviewed yet, insinuating that she would charge for condoms and the like, just because she happened to mention she prefers to cater to wealthy clients. Calling her a gold digger and not an escort seems excessive don't you think ? The poor girl is trying to earn a living and you are slamming her for advertising for higher end clients. Maybe she is lacking in experience and will need to adjust her ad commensurate with her attitude, service level and looks, only time will tell, but you're just a little too judgmental in my opinion on the poor girl right out of the gate.

Seems to me you're both making a judgement you've just reached different verdicts. I see a guy saying "not for me" and another saying "for me" - how is one more valid than the other?