Asian Sexy Babe

Stronger gun laws is half the solution... the other half is curbing hollywood/games?

Do we need to tone down (gun) violence in movies and games?

  • Yes. Hollywood and games glorify guns too much

    Votes: 14 26.9%
  • No. It will not make an impact. Other countries like the same stuff but have less gun issues

    Votes: 33 63.5%
  • It is unclear if it would make a difference

    Votes: 5 9.6%

  • Total voters
    52

Don

Active member
Aug 23, 2001
6,288
10
38
Toronto
A lot of talk on gun control. It's about time they start tightning the rules. But Jamie Foxx made another point:

http://www.examiner.com/article/jam...nd-kerry-washington-on-violence-film-industry

"We cannot turn our back and say that violence in films or anything that we do doesn't have a sort of influence. It does," Fox said in an interview.

I think he's right. Maybe I'm getting old but I can't watch these "action" movies any more. They are too violent. And so much gun violence. And it is the "hero" that is using them like mad too.

Of course Tarantino wants to bury his head like many in Hollywood:

Tarantino went on a bit of a tangent, explaining that he was tired of defending his films each time the nation was shocked by gun violence. He stated that “tragedies happen” and that blame should fall on those guilty of the crimes.

Honestly that is the same excuse that the pro-gun people say ("blame the criminal, not the gun").

And violent video games don't help either. I saw my nephew play one of the first person shooter games and it is fucking violent as hell with all these crazy guns. And you get bonus points for making a guys head explode with a shot. nasty.

Now I guess we are toeing a line here that makes me uncomfortable - censorship... but is it time?
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,937
2,885
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Canadians and Europeans have the same access to voilent movies. Japan's movies are more voilent and they don't have the same problems with mass shootings like the U.S.
 

Don

Active member
Aug 23, 2001
6,288
10
38
Toronto
Canadians and Europeans have the same access to voilent movies. Japan's movies are more voilent and they don't have the same problems with mass shootings like the U.S.
What I have noticed is that other countries abroad have their violence in their movies but it does not have anywhere near the amount of gun violence. And one Korean director remarked about not only the use of guns but the glorification of the "anti-hero" in Hollywood.
 

afterhours

New member
Jul 14, 2009
6,322
3
0
I wish there is more female nudity in movies.:happy:
American economy seems to have always been driven by the frustrated sex-starved males. By way of comparison, in Russia or in Latin America you have more women than you can fuck and the economy is not going anywhere. So I guess when these same males go on a shooting spree (and it's never males who had access to pussy) it should simply be written off as price for economic success.
 

Don

Active member
Aug 23, 2001
6,288
10
38
Toronto
I guess that leaves no possibility of better mental health interventions as an option, eh?
Like what? Apparently he was getting good treatment... beyond what most can get (her divorce left her financially very solid where she did not have to work and can be with her child full time)
 

ooh-ya-more

Member
Aug 30, 2004
202
0
16
I remeber hearing that in WW2 alot of soldiers had trouble directly shooting and killing other soldiers. So the army did extensive training to condition its soldiers to kill almost as a second nature.

Today we are teaching kids right from preschool introducing them to violent behaviour. It has to have some effect. By the time their teenagers their numb to violent behaviour. Its all just part of the norm.

There is no going back.
 

Rockslinger

Banned
Apr 24, 2005
32,776
0
0
Apparently he was getting good treatment... beyond what most can get (her divorce left her financially very solid where she did not have to work and can be with her child full time)
Can't blame poverty and discrimination for this one.
 

Rockslinger

Banned
Apr 24, 2005
32,776
0
0
I remeber hearing that in WW2 alot of soldiers had trouble directly shooting and killing other soldiers.
Back in the good old days, when I was growing up in small town Ontario, many people had no problems killing living things (moose, deer, bears, foxes, coyotes, raccoons, coyotes, birds, squirrels, etc.) but never human beings. Now, all the animals are protected so some people are turning to killing other people.

BTW: The hunters in our little town didn't need a bloody semi-automatic or automatic rifle with 6,000 rounds to bring down game. All they needed was a single shot carbine. That is talent.
 

rhuarc29

Well-known member
Apr 15, 2009
9,647
1,281
113
I don't know...I still see a huge different between having easy access to violent viewing material and having easy access to a tool of death. I haven't seen a reliable study that says watching violent movies or playing violent video games makes an individual more violent. In fact, I've seen a few studies that say there's no correlation.
 
May 8, 2010
1,015
1
0
I've seen studies linking violent behaviour to the viewing of violent movies/television. I would imagine the same is true for violent video games.

Nevertheless, I would agree also with the poster above who stated that access to violent media/entertainment seems fundamentally different than access to "tools of death."

I would support stricter gun control legislation. I'm not sure, though, about censoring movies/games in the same way as censorship can create other unintended problems.

Regarding movies/video games, my preferred approach would be public education around the problems with this kind of entertainment. My hope would be that citizens could learn to be more thoughtful about the media they consume and that these movies/games would simply become socially unacceptable to the point that the market for them became minimal.
 

HEYHEY

Well-known member
Nov 25, 2005
2,537
641
113
You can put a loaded handgun in the hands of 99.9% of the population and no one will die.

The other .01% however will break any law, regulation and will find a gun and kill someone with it regardless of whether the gun is legally or illegally obtained.

People need to come with terms and realize that you cannot bubble wrap the world and instead use logic and not emotion every time something like this happens.

What would everyone suggest if this kids mother was a cop and he got a hold of her guns that way? Disarm all cops? Carry batons?
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
The US appears to be some kind of exception, and some people seem to be tempted to blame it on their gun policy. I think it's much more likely caused by the disparity between rich and poor, by the lingering effects of slavery and then discrimination against blacks, and so on.

If you exclude the US and look at other countries, comparing those with strong gun laws, to lax gun laws, it doesn't seem like gun policy makes much or any difference.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
The ghost of Tipper Gore...
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Unless one is an Orangeman, every ethnic group has suffered discrimination, but not every ethnic group has a high gun crime rate.
Which other ethnic groups were enslaved? Yes, it was hundreds of years ago, but I think the stigma has not fully worn off, and certainly the civil rights movement was explosively controversial within living memory. It is fair to say that blacks have suffered a style of discrimination that is somewhat different than what most other groups have faced.
 
Toronto Escorts