Hot Pink List

Lance Armstrong: Enough is enough, won't fight doping charges

rld

New member
Oct 12, 2010
10,664
2
0
You seem to have missed the point: Most people already know he's guilty and don't actually need more information. It's only nitpickers like you who spend their entire life on TERB arguing about everything that might have fun geeking out on the details.
So you speak for most people do you? Talk about pomposity. I guess facts never really do enter into your equation.

I like to chase you around and remind people that you are happy to defend pedophile priests and diddling Boy Scout leaders for your own particular reasons while trying to maintain the patina of the detached analyst of data and reasoned argument. You spend your entire existence on TERB arguing about nothing, but some of us know who you really are. As I mentioned before, consider yourself happy to exist anonymously, because you'd get smoked in a social setting.
This is a lie. I have never defended a pedophile priest or a diddling boyscout leader. Ever. I recommend you either retract and apologize or post a link that proves that I did such a thing. I will wait 24 hours.

Let's see if you have anything to back up your hot air.

If for some reason you feel the need to follow me around and lie about me, perhaps a mental health board would be better for you?

And the funny thing is, I am quite successful in real life. I have my doubts about you.
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
28,689
6,474
113
If for some reason you feel the need to follow me around and lie about me, perhaps a mental health board would be better for you?

And the funny thing is, I am quite successful in real life. I have my doubts about you
I think his location says it all....LOL
 

friedrice

Banned
Oct 14, 2010
490
0
0
Crack and Whore
So you speak for most people do you? Talk about pomposity. I guess facts never really do enter into your equation.



This is a lie. I have never defended a pedophile priest or a diddling boyscout leader. Ever. I recommend you either retract and apologize or post a link that proves that I did such a thing. I will wait 24 hours.

Let's see if you have anything to back up your hot air.

If for some reason you feel the need to follow me around and lie about me, perhaps a mental health board would be better for you?

And the funny thing is, I am quite successful in real life. I have my doubts about you.
Once again, your same old saw: "I'm a successful guy." The other variation: "I'm an experienced litigator." Who would say such things with a straight face?

Also, who follows who? As I rather dryly noted, you spend your entire life here. I'd say that speaks to who you are in your "real life" rather more than what you posture yourself as. An experienced litigator who defends victims of child abuse, while simultaneously spending his other 23 hours on a hooker board defending The Catholic Church/Boy Scouts against claims of sexual abuse? A rather pathetic and inconvenient position, no?

(BTW anyone with a search click can see the posts where you very carefully defend child abusers in institutional settings, because you like The Catholic Church and The Boy Scouts more than you like the truth. It's all there pal.)

And when you say you will "wait 24 hours" what happens after that? LOL. What a pompous moron you are.
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,084
1
0
Once again, your same old saw: "I'm a successful guy." The other variation: "I'm an experienced litigator." Who would say such things with a straight face?

Also, who follows who? As I rather dryly noted, you spend your entire life here. I'd say that speaks to who you are in your "real life" rather more than what you posture yourself as. An experienced litigator who defends victims of child abuse, while simultaneously spending his other 23 hours on a hooker board defending The Catholic Church/Boy Scouts against claims of sexual abuse? A rather pathetic and inconvenient position, no?

(BTW anyone with a search click can see the posts where you very carefully defend child abusers in institutional settings, because you like The Catholic Church and The Boy Scouts more than you like the truth. It's all there pal.)

And when you say you will "wait 24 hours" what happens after that? LOL. What a pompous moron you are.
One could read this as you standing in front of your mirror this morning and thinking out loud. It's been suggested that I shouldn't call an @#&$@$% an
@#&$@%, so I'll leave that t others, but it's clear you ability to retain information from past threads or understand english is sorely in need of improvement.
 

rld

New member
Oct 12, 2010
10,664
2
0
Once again, your same old saw: "I'm a successful guy." The other variation: "I'm an experienced litigator." Who would say such things with a straight face?

Also, who follows who? As I rather dryly noted, you spend your entire life here. I'd say that speaks to who you are in your "real life" rather more than what you posture yourself as. An experienced litigator who defends victims of child abuse, while simultaneously spending his other 23 hours on a hooker board defending The Catholic Church/Boy Scouts against claims of sexual abuse? A rather pathetic and inconvenient position, no?

(BTW anyone with a search click can see the posts where you very carefully defend child abusers in institutional settings, because you like The Catholic Church and The Boy Scouts more than you like the truth. It's all there pal.)

And when you say you will "wait 24 hours" what happens after that? LOL. What a pompous moron you are.
Still no evidence. You claimed I defended pedophiles, that was, and remains a lie. I have never defended a child abuser on this board. You are down to about four hours now.

The successful comment of course was in response to your ill-informed comment about my ability to function in social circles. If you choose to stalk me and lie about me, I will tell people the truth.
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
28,689
6,474
113
Armstrong's personal assistant unloads on him:

http://www.outsideonline.com/outdoor-adventure/biking/road-biking/My-Life-With-Lance-Armstrong.html

This is karma baby, the way you treat people during the early parts of your life has a way of biting you back in the ass later in life

My Life With Lance Armstrong

I was Lance’s personal assistant for two years, during the height of his racing career. Do I think he cheated? Yep. But my real problem is something that diehard fans seem unable to grasp: the vengeful tactics he uses against people who tell the truth about him, on and off the bike.

Last week, just before the news broke that Lance Armstrong had decided to walk away from his battle with the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) and accept the likely loss of seven Tour de France titles, Betsy Andreu gave an interview to Bill Strickland, an editor-at-large for Bicycling magazine who has written frequently about the allegations that Armstrong doped. Betsy, the wife of one-time Armstrong teammate Frankie Andreu, has been a public critic of Armstrong’s for a long time, starting back in 2005. That year she and Frankie both gave depositions saying that in 1996 they heard Armstrong tell doctors in an Indianapolis hospital room that he’d used EPO, human growth hormone, cortisone, steroids, and testosterone.

Armstrong has always denied that. As often happens with him, the denial has been accompanied by harsh attacks on the messenger. So, in his telling, Betsy wasn’t just mistaken about what she said she’d heard, she was a liar and a shrew, motivated by “bitterness, jealousy, and hatred.” In fact, her motivation was straightforward: she was subpoenaed to give a sworn statement in a legal dispute between Armstrong and Dallas-based SCA Promotions, which was trying to withhold a $5 million bonus payment to Armstrong based on allegations that he’d doped to win the 2004 Tour de France.

Strickland asked her what it was like to be blasted for speaking honestly. “What’s the upside been, going up against Lance?” she said. “To be publicly and privately portrayed as an ugly, obese, jealous, obsessed, hateful, crazed bitch?” She pointed out that crossing Armstrong wasn’t exactly good for her husband’s career arc in bike racing—she believes he lost his 2006 job as team director for Toyota-United because of the controversy surrounding their statements.

Andreu isn’t alone in being vilified. Others on the list include David Walsh (co-author of the investigative book L.A. Confidentiel, who Armstrong once called “a fucking little troll”), Greg LeMond, Floyd Landis, Tyler Hamilton, Emma O’Reilly, Richard Pound, Travis Tygart, and me.

I joined Armstrong’s staff in late 2002 as a mechanic, trail builder, and all-around handyman and assistant. At that time, we were friends who had often been on mountain-bike rides together, and he had made a written and verbal commitment to finance my dream of opening an Austin bike shop once my work with him was done. Armstrong soured on me for reasons that had nothing to do with my performance as an employee, and when I was abruptly fired in late 2004, no clear reason was given for my termination. He reneged on the promise about the bike shop and started attacking me, personally and professionally, in a way that ruined my job prospects in Austin. I ended up moving my family to New Zealand to start a new life.

Keep in mind that Armstrong went on the offensive first—filing a civil suit that alleged I was extorting him—simply because I was trying to get him to live up to a business agreement we’d made. Unlike some of his foes, such as Landis and LeMond, I had never said a harsh word about him in public. I countersued to protect my livelihood and reputation, and during a battle that was ultimately settled out of court, Armstrong and his lawyers dismissed me as a disgruntled schemer, a line they continue to push whenever my name comes up. A fact sheet that Armstrong’s camp supplies in response to journalists’ queries about me is headlined “Anderson’s Complete Lack of Credibility.”

Armstrong is having a bad year, and it’s about to get worse. His lawyers’ efforts to derail USADA’s case against him—a scorched-earth campaign aimed at destroying the organization outright—failed, so he chose to quit rather than keep fighting. But more revelations are coming soon, with the release of The Secret Race, a tell-all by Tyler Hamilton and co-author Daniel Coyle that promises to expose U.S. Postal’s organized doping program in excruciating detail. Judging by an Associated Press report based on an advance copy, the book could be the death blow to Armstrong’s reputation as an athlete.

Unlike Hamilton, I can’t offer dramatic proof that Armstrong doped—the evidence I saw and heard was convincing to me, but it was also circumstantial—but I can shed light on how he operates as a friend and an employer. This is relevant because Armstrong’s strongest remaining line of defense is that he’s a good guy who’s being victimized, a theme that permeated his statement last Thursday. He still doesn’t admit that he cheated, instead claiming that he’s walking away because USADA’s “charade” is rigged and the legal battles are taking too much of a toll on him and his family. “From the beginning,” he wrote, “this investigation has not been about learning the truth or cleaning up cycling, but about punishing me at all costs.”

<read more at link>
 

dirkd101

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2005
10,480
405
83
eastern frontier
Lance is keeping a stiff upper lip to the whole affair, recently in Montreal he unequivocally stated that he is a seven time winner of the Tour de France.
 

Baller Time

I can't remembe..Romnesla
Dec 13, 2011
2,108
1
38
Lance is keeping a stiff upper lip to the whole affair, recently in Montreal he unequivocally stated that he is a seven time winner of the Tour de France.
Carl Lewis, Roger Clemens and Lance Armstrong....biggest douchebags in and out of sport. Burn in hell cheaters.
 

gcostanza

Well-known member
Jul 24, 2010
7,817
529
113

Baller Time

I can't remembe..Romnesla
Dec 13, 2011
2,108
1
38
Youtube and Google can help you fake the fact you're an IT professional....Same with being a "lawyer".
 

Adam_hadam

Well-known member
Feb 26, 2008
1,634
1,106
113
10 of his former team mates and some of his doctors were preparing to testify against him. Blood tests in 2009 and 2010 showed evidence of blood doping. So Armstrong obviously did not want this damning evidence presented publicly. He limits the publicity damage by not contesting the charges so he can continue to rake in millions in speaking fees. Smart move on his part.
Preparing to testify AND actually testifying then being cross-examined are 2 different things.

Doesn't mean poop, pull out Lance's positive samples then we'll dq him.
 

rld

New member
Oct 12, 2010
10,664
2
0
Youtube and Google can help you fake the fact you're an IT professional....Same with being a "lawyer".
Being a lawyer actually requires a little more paper and regulation than being an IT professional. At least in Ontario.
 

rld

New member
Oct 12, 2010
10,664
2
0
Preparing to testify AND actually testifying then being cross-examined are 2 different things.

Doesn't mean poop, pull out Lance's positive samples then we'll dq him.
By not fighting, he more or less dq'ed himself. I have not seen where the ASO or UCI have landed on this issue yet. It will be interesting.
 

Baller Time

I can't remembe..Romnesla
Dec 13, 2011
2,108
1
38
Do you think someone is doing that here?

Do you do it? Are those the training aids you rely on?
nah I don't claim to be anything when I post. Just my opinion. However one thing I will claim is that I can deftly sniff out a liar. You reek buddy.
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,084
1
0
nah I don't claim to be anything when I post. Just my opinion. However one thing I will claim is that I can deftly sniff out a liar. You reek buddy.
RLD has never 'claimed' to be anything. His contributions in threads regarding the law have shown more than once he's got inside professional knowledge, unlike some of the TERB wannabes. There are perhaps another half dozen members who are also lawyers and they seldom bring him to task on his various interpretation or facts. At least he sites facts and not just opinions. Those who fall back on that explanation about 'all' of their posts being just opinions are quietly saying they can say anything they want, it's only my opinion. Pekkerhead does that very well and most on here ignore his posts.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts