Infertility clinics but you need to be referred after trying to conceive for awhile I believe, I don't think there's any way to find out just for kicks or peace of mind.
Thanks for the info/opinion.
Why are you worried about getting an SP or casual partner pregnant and getting infected with HIV but not HPV, gonorrhea, syphilis and other STIs?
Unlike HIV, gonorrhea & syphillus are easily cured.
I can understand if its for your own reassurance but I don't know any SP who would be okay with BBFS even with the world's most airtight documentation that she won't get pregnant.
Speaking of SP's globally, or to a lesser extent even Canadian, i believe many (a significant percentage of) SP's are ok with BBFS. Based on my experiences and extensive reading of such threads on several forums.
If a woman WAS willing to provide BBFS, I don't think pregnancy would be her main concern as she'd have already dealt with it (IUD, BCP, Depo, etc).
I think a majority of SP's are willing, under the right circumstances, to provide BBFS to an SO or at least one client.
Getting a SP pregnant is not my "main concern", but still a concern. Some SP's often do not use any
form of birth control, or use only condoms, which are a rather poor means of preventing pregnancies
(similar to Coitus Interruptus/withdrawal).
The advantage it would have is that you would know you were immune to HIV. This means nothing to any of your sex partners; you can still pass it on.
According to the following article:
"Then there's the pesky matter of the few people who have gotten infected with HIV even though they're supposed to be immune. "It's extremely rare"..."
http://www.wired.com/medtech/health/news/2005/01/66198?currentPage=2
BTW the HIV virus has been passed on in numerous instances inspite of consistent condom use.
Which raises the question of what provides more effective safety vs HIV, condoms, or immunity?
And if one is immune, by what percentage does it reduce the risk for HIV, compared to not being immune?
Consistent condom use reduces the risk for HIV by 85-90% relative to BBFS. So far from being "safe". Similarly, circumcision reduces the risk for HIV by 50-60% compared to BBFS, so it's also far from guaranteeing protection.