I think the weirdest thing is about it is that her stance is almost...sexual....hand on the hip.foot lightly off the ground.Take that kid out of the picture and tel me that couldn't be a stance for modeling?Plus.. is this her way(and Time's) of telling us all breast feeding mothers should be a buck - O - 5 in weight and look fantastically made up? That picture is about as Au Naturale as a good pair of bolt ons.Creepy.
yes, its not breastfeeding an old kid that bothers many of us.. Its the way this girl poses for Time magazine, probably got paid well, and the way TIME is asking women if they're "MOM ENOUGH" or not. Does it make a woman less of a mom if she chooses not to breast feed a grown up kid? I thought motherhood was more than just breast feeding kids. Be a mom, raise your kid however you feel comfortable. Don't go parading and trying to preach what should or shouldn't be the norm. Heck, I feel sorry for that 5 year old adopted kid who is being breast fed by her. At that age, I probably understood so much.. and would probably get a hardon if such a young girl let me near her breasts xDD hell.. I didn't know anything about sex, dicks or anything as such, but I know I sure as hell had fantasies about women's breasts because I knew they were taboo. xD
And I agree with Rockslingers comment. It will ruin that kid. I for one know that finding my dad's semi-porn magazines when I was really young didn't do too good for my development.
