Ashley Madison

Zimbabwe critical of S Africa ruling on abuse

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,866
5,453
113
Zimbabwe critical of S Africa ruling on abuse
Unprecedented ruling may see some in President Robert Mugabe's administration prosecuted for torturing opponents.
Last Modified: 10 May 2012 01:10

Zimbabwe's justice minister has denounced a South African court ruling that would allow prosecutions related to alleged torture under President Robert Mugabe.

"The ruling brings the South African justice system into disrepute. No specifics have been identified, because they should have laid a blow by blow account of what crime has been committed," Patrick Chinamasa told state media on Wednesday.

The Tuesday ruling could affect Zimbabwean refugees, many of whom have fled to neighbouring South Africa, and government officials, who also sometimes come on business or personal trips.

In a landmark judgement, high court judge Hans Fabricius ruled that authorities in South Africa can probe and prosecute not only high-level crimes committed in neighbouring Zimbabwe, but anywhere else in the world.

National Prosecuting Authority spokesman Mthunzi Mhaga said prosecutors will study the ruling and decide what legal steps to take.

"There may be an appeal,'' said James Gathii, co-chairman of the Africa interest group of the American Society of International Law. ``But I think that more likely than not the [prosecutors] and police will have to take a closer look at the case.''

Tsvangirai's party pleased

The case centres on Zimbabwean officials accused of state-sanctioned torture against scores of activists following a raid on the headquarters of the Movement for Democratic Change in 2007.

MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai is now the prime minister in a power-sharing government with Mugabe, and his party hailed the decision.

"Torture is a barbaric instrument of dealing with issues of politics," spokesman Nelson Chamisa told the AFP news agency. "For that reason it remains our wish that all people of Zimbabwe with injured hearts and troubled minds are brought to restorative and rehabilitative, as opposed to retributive, justice."

The Southern Africa Litigation Centre and the Zimbabwe Exiles Forum filed the case in Pretoria seeking to force prosecutors to open an investigation, citing South Africa's obligations to the International Criminal Court.

The two groups want South Africa to arrest and prosecute 17 Zimbabweans accused of torture in 2007 if they enter the country for holiday, shopping or seeking medical treatment.

South African police and prosecutors refused to investigate in 2008, citing the difficulty and possible political repercussions and saying the law was unclear. In his ruling Tuesday, Fabricius said that refusal was `"unlawful,
inconsistent with the constitution, and therefore invalid.''

Fabricius's ruling was the first under 2002 statues spelling out South Africa's international obligations and risks complicating the country's role as the main mediator in Zimbabwe's political crisis.

Zimbabwe has been governed by a shaky coalition of Mugabe's ZANU-PF and Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai's Movement for Democratic Change since 2008. Mugabe, who has led Zimbabwe since independence from Britain in 1980, and his ZANU-PF party are accused of using violence and intimidation to hold onto power.

The 88-year-old Mugabe is pushing for elections this year, though few observers think a vote this year could be free or fair. Mugabe has been nominated as his party's sole presidential candidate.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,866
5,453
113
Thanks for the laugh, although a source would be a good thing.
Torture and the ruling that SA must prosecute the perpetrators if they set feet on SA soil, is as far from funny as anything.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,866
5,453
113
For those who are too lazy to look up a story, here is one from BBC in Qatar:

South Africa court orders Zimbabwe torture investigation
Zimbabwean victim of torture Rights groups have long expressed concern about human right abuses and torture in Zimbabwe
Continue reading the main story
Zimbabwe - New Era?

Wikileaks woe for Mugabe
Return to Harare
Torture camp discovered
Glasnost - African style

South Africa must investigate Zimbabwean officials over allegations they tortured opposition figures in 2007, a Pretoria high court has ruled.

Under international law, South Africa has a duty to investigate crimes against humanity, the judge said.

Prosecutors had previously refused to investigate the officials, who had travelled to South Africa.

Zimbabwe's justice minister dismissed the ruling, saying South Africa had no right to investigate cases in Zimbabwe.
'Shiver down the spines'

The case was brought by the Southern Africa Litigation Centre (SALC), along with the Zimbabwean Exiles Forum (ZEF), many of whose members fled to South Africa saying they had been tortured by Zimbabwean security agents.

They argued that because South Africa recognises the International Criminal Court (ICC), it is obliged to act on allegations of torture, which is classified as a crime against humanity.
Continue reading the main story
“Start Quote

The ICC is there for serious crimes against humanity - not ordinary crime, which is what these exiles are trying to suggest”

Patrick Chinamasa Zimbabwe justice minister

Confessions of a Zimbabwe torturer

It centres on an incident in 2007, when supporters of the then-opposition Movement for Democratic Change say they were tortured after a raid on their party headquarters. They have named 17 Zimbabwean officials and want them arrested and prosecuted.

South African Judge Hans Fabricius ruled that police and prosecutors had acted "unconstitutionally and unlawfully" - and ordered them to conduct an investigation.

"In my view it is clear when an investigation under the ICC Act is requested, and a reasonable basis exists for doing an investigation, political considerations or diplomatic initiatives are not relevant," Judge Hans Fabricius said.

SALC and ZEF said South African police and the National Prosecuting Authority refused to investigate, citing "political considerations".

South Africa is the main regional mediator in Zimbabwe's political crisis, and Zimbabwean officials regularly travel to the country on official and personal business.

Human rights groups have welcomed the judgment as ground-breaking.

"This judgment will send a shiver down the spines of Zimbabwean officials who believed that they would never be held to account for their crimes but now face investigation by the South African authorities," said human rights lawyer Nicole Fritz of SALC.

Zimbabwe's Justice Minister Patrick Chinamasa told the BBC's Brian Hungwe that South Africa had no jurisdiction over Zimbabwe.

"We have done nothing wrong in this country that would justify bringing us under the jurisdiction of the ICC, even if we were a state party," he said.

"The ICC is there for serious crimes against humanity - not ordinary crime, which is what these exiles are trying to suggest."

As many as four million Zimbabweans have sought economic and political refuge in neighbouring South Africa.
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,084
1
0
DM, usually when you C&P something it's good form to offer up the source, but apparently you think differently.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts