Further clarification on what Dreamblade said:
210 overturn upheld
210 is keeping a common bawdy house, being found in a common bawdy house, being a landlord or tenant of a common bawdy house. Himel ruled this law is unconstitutional, the Ontario Court of Appeals agrees with her!
213(j) overturn upheld
213(j) is living off the avails of prostitution (taking money or gifts that are a result of prostitution). This would be stuff like an agency owner, a phone girl, a driver, a web designer, a photographer, etc but also friends and family of prostitutes receiving money or gifts (paying for Christmas presents, buying medication for dependents, etc). Himel ruled this law is unconstitutional and the Ontario Court of Appeals agrees with her!
Communicating for the purposes of prostitution in public is still illegal (213(c)). Phone calls, txts, emails and such are usually done in private.
I'm sure once Nikki has breathing space she'll come on and explain in more details. Press release starts now!! (519 Church St)
Actually, all three of these laws are known as the anti-pimp laws and 2/3 overturns were upheld. Pimping as you're referring to it (the forcing of anyone to work in exploitative situations or contexts) is covered in other parts of the Criminal Code and was not being challenged at all. Same with trafficking, street harassment, child porn and pretty much everything else. "Pimping" as some people are using it on this thread (typically people providing and being paid for a service, like owners) is living off the avails and that overturn was upheld.