Ronald Reagan is really Karl Marx with an ICBM?

Cobster

New member
Apr 29, 2002
10,422
0
0
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/03/19/446990/obama-bush-reagan-government-spending/

http://thinkprogress.org/author/apeck/Mar 19, 2012 at 10:55 am Republicans have continually decried the Obama Administration’s “runaway spending” since he took office, blaming him for growing deficits and a mounting national debt. But a quick glance at the facts show that, compared to George W. Bush and Ronald Reagan, Obama is actually embracing fiscal conservatism more than any other president in recent history, with the exception of fellow Democrat Bill Clinton.

The Atlantic crunches the numbers:
For all the talk you hear about Obama’s historic spree, government spending actually hasn’t increased so dramatically under this president. The stimulus was big, but it’s over. It’s been replaced by, if not austerity (which has struck our states and cities) then a hard correction to the center.
Evidence of the cost-cutting measures employed by Obama can be found in the last several jobs reports. While the overall number of jobs created has steadily increased for the last several months, those advances have all come entirely in the private sector. Public sector jobs have actually been on the decline for much of the last year as government spending on some agencies and programs have been cut.
Economics Professor Mark Thoma provides a helpful chart on his blog that puts President Obama’s per capita spending into context, comparing it with the spending of every president in the last 40 years.
That’s likely a hard pill to swallow for Obama’s critics, who have spent years hammering his administration for record spending and fiscal irresponsibility.
The Atlantic’s Derek Thompson put it best: “Going by federal expenditures…it would seem that if Obama’s a socialist, Ronald Reagan is Karl Marx with an ICBM.”
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,749
3
0
1) The Atlantic Monthly is a well to the left of center publication, and that should be taken into consideration.

2) If they are correct why has the national debt of the U.S. balloned during the past three years the way it has?
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,957
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
It is actually true that only Democrats ever seem to balance the budget. Republicans tend to cut social spending and promote themselves as fiscal conservatives, but in reality they bankrupt the country on military adventurism.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,749
3
0
It is actually true that only Democrats ever seem to balance the budget. Republicans tend to cut social spending and promote themselves as fiscal conservatives, but in reality they bankrupt the country on military adventurism.
If so why has the U.S. national debt expanded so during the Obama Administration.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,749
3
0
Fine, you explain why if everything is so wonderful the U.S. National Debt has skyrocketed as it has.

Sarcastic remarks don't do that.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
79,957
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Fine, you explain why if everything is so wonderful the U.S. National Debt has skyrocketed as it has.

Sarcastic remarks don't do that.
Where have I said everything is so wonderful? I simply said that only Democrats ever seem to pay off the deficit. And that's true.

Republicans are good at cutting social program spending, but they more than make up for it through irresponsible military adventurism.

I don't see where I've said everything is wonderful. Quite the opposite!!!
 

rld

New member
Oct 12, 2010
10,664
2
0
If so why has the U.S. national debt expanded so during the Obama Administration.
- an inability to raise taxes
- the stimulus plan
- military costs
- expanding entitlement spending that no one has the balls to talk about seriously let alone deal with
- a drop in revenues due to the economic downturn
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,749
3
0
- an inability to raise taxes
- the stimulus plan
- military costs
- expanding entitlement spending that no one has the balls to talk about seriously let alone deal with
- a drop in revenues due to the economic downturn
All but the first, and to be charitable the last, can be squarely laid at the President's doorstep.
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
46,954
5,789
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
Doonesbury on GOP Fiscal Responsibility...Here are the FACTS our myopic friends on the right ignore!....:rolleyes:
 

blackrock13

Banned
Jun 6, 2009
40,084
1
0
All but the first, and to be charitable the last, can be squarely laid at the President's doorstep.
The war can be blamed on Obama? Aartie! What were you expecting, him to just cut and run, telling his allies, bubye I got to balance my bank books.

The rest were as a result of the economic shit pile he was handed off by most of the previous 30 years.

As far as the AM report, are the figure wrong?
 
Toronto Escorts