I've decided to ignore the close-minded dickheads, I mean christ, I feel like I'm back in high school arguing grade 9 philosophy shit.
But this is worth answering.
op could have just said could you accept if your child was gay. no need to add eugenics to the mix.
There is a huge difference. When your kid is 12 and he comes to you and says, "Dad, I'm gay." At that point you give your son a big hug and say, "Be whoever you want to be, I love you just as much as yesterday and always will." And for those that feel differently, they still have no choice. Its their kid and they have to deal with it.
But I'm talking about this problem with abortion, in today's world where chicks still have a choice to do whatever the hell they want with their bodies.
This whole gay thing is a powder-keg it seems. There have been topics throughout history that have just grown so touchy that people instantly blow up if you put that topic in a negative light. God help you if you voice differently, even just to pose a thoughtful question. If you were at a gathering (party) and someone said, "Hey, what percentage of the population would have abortions if there a test to show their kid would turn out gay?" .. would you (dickheads) suddenly blurt out the same response? Maybe you would. That's kind of scary in a way. THINK LIKE WE DO OR BE STONED TO DEATH. I wonder if a screenwriter who poses this kind of topic in one of his stories would also be considered to have, "symptoms of a decrement mind with no use to humanity whatsoever."
What if I had used a different topic? Take other examples. You (or your wife) is pregnant and there's a test that shows your child will be morbidly obese their entire lives. Well that sucks, abort that sucker. Or maybe your child will have a max IQ of 80. That sucks too. No university for you kiddo, you gotta learn to drive a truck. If I had asked either of these questions, would I still have a 'decrement mind' or be considered psychotic for even thinking such a thing?
By the way, as of this posting there are 60 people who say no, they wouldn't get an abortion, and 9 that say either yes, they would get an abortion or yes if it was a boy. So 15% of respondents would at least consider the abortion. That's a pretty big number when you think about it. Is the question so absurd?